Typical of so-called "progressives" and "liberals", the Collier 
brother's book, "VOTESCAM: The Stealing of America" (published in 1992), 
has been systematically ignored as a source on history and methodology 
of vote fraud in the US going back decades (to read the first 19 
chapters of Votescam, go to: 
http://www.constitution.org/vote/votescam__.htm, 
http://www.votescam.com/home1.php)

Why has this book been disregarded for nearly 15 years by the 
"prog/libs"?  Because the Collier's didn't play political favorites in 
terms of which party's election fraud they were exposing. One of the 
(then Republican) Collier's ran for US Congress against Democrat Claude 
Pepper in Florida and experienced vote rigging in that election, yet 
prog/lib Dems don't want to discuss that story. There is no doubt that 
Democrats and Party machinery around the country stand to lose a lot of 
credibility if and when a more complete history of vote rigging in this 
country is given credence. And now the NY Times says election fraud may 
well have happened in the 2004 Ohio election. Well who woulda thunk?

The plain truth of it is, both parties have been deep in election 
rigging for the entire history of this country, while organized crime 
and CIA cutouts are in the wings, covering up the trail before it pops 
up in a newspaper somewhere. Now it doesn't even matter if the rigging 
is exposed in the light of day - look at the Kerry and Democratic Party 
response to Ohio in 2004!. No problem, the CIA doesn't even bother 
anymore to veil it's election rigging operations in foreign countries 
targeted for destabilization and coups d'etat, why should they or their 
Republican and Democratic party sponsors bother with domestic election 
rigging if no one cares enough to stop it. Now the CIA openly brags 
about its kidnapping and torture operations yet like bleeding parrots, 
the prog/libs are content to call it "Extraordinary Rendition" and 
scratch their Democratic Party hat festooned noggins without a clue as 
to what to do about it.

Most so-called progressives and liberals just smile and shrug their 
shoulders when the facts of election rigging in Illinois in the 1960 
Presidential election are brought up. Of course we are all "glad" that 
JFK was installed in the White House over Tricky Dick, but is that the 
only measure of political impetus in the 'land of the free and the home 
of the brave'?  It would seem so.
And again, after two frauded-up Presidential election cycles come and 
gone, the liberals and progressives are still mired in the muck of 
Democratic Party control as the current "Let's all get on the bandwagon 
and defend Bill Clinton on 911" operation is in full swing (while sober 
questions about the facts about the 911 events are still avoided and 
questionable investigative exposes on the events are promoted without 
consideration that some of the information smells of red herring).

Welcome to the land of programmed political failure of the ignorant and 
stupid. "All Hail Hillary for 2008", as the feminist contingent 
gleefully prepares itself to be baited into a sea of house parties 
promoting dead end narrow political platforms and Bush gang operatives 
in centrist clothing, while the police state burgeons and the genocide 
flourishes with DU for all. I still see Gore/Lieberman and Kerry/Edwards 
bumper stickers on cars in LA, their drivers with that typical 
"progressive/liberal", deer-in-the-headlights look on their face, 
yapping on their cell phones as they drive their SUV's and Subaru 
Foresters to Whole Foods. As if ANY of the Democrats have any intention 
of being an obstacle to the Bush/CIA juggernaut to unfettered 
totalitarianism and broad genocide (how else are we going to depopulate 
the planet, right?).

John Kerry still hasn't made an issue of the stolen 2004 election. He 
only has one more year before the statute of limitations runs out on 
those crimes. Don't hold your "progressive" breath. What a fraud. The 
Democrats, our only hope? Make no mistake, the 2006 general election 
will see only those Democrats winning their elections who are actually 
in alignment with the Bush gang's foreign policy goals. The model? Sen 
Barbara Boxer, Rep Nancy Pelosi, etc. The Dems may actually gain control 
of the House but what Democrats will those be?  I say they will be 
Demopubs in collagen and greasepaint, ready to suck the cock of the 
military industrial complex and the national security state like they 
always have.

JM

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:     [change-links] The myth of fair elections in America
Date:     Sat, 9 Sep 2006 06:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
From:     Geraldo Cienmarcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The myth of fair elections in America

http://tinyurl.com/k42q7

The debacle surrounding the Republican victory in 2000 demonstrated to the
world that America's electoral process is wide open to abuse. But as Paul
Harris discovers, the system has actually worsened since then

Thursday September 7, 2006
Observer.co.uk

One person, one vote. Count the totals. The one with the most wins. The 
beauty
of democracy is its simplicity and its inherent fairness. It equalises
everyone, even as it empowers everyone. What could go wrong? In America, it
turns out, quite a lot.

Everyone remembers the debacle in Florida, 2000. The recounts, the law suits
and the eventual deciding of a presidential election - not by the voters 
- but
by the Supreme Court. The memory still causes a collective shudder to 
America's
body politic.

Which makes the fact that America's system of voting is now even more 
suspect,
more complicated, and more open to abuse than ever before so utterly 
shocking.
Across the country a bewildering series of scandals or dubious practises are
proliferating beyond control. The prospect of a 'second Florida' is now more
likely not less. There are many - and not all of them are conspiracy 
theorists
- who believed it may have happened in Ohio in 2004.

This week the venerable New York Times was the latest of many 
organisations and
institutions to declare that America's democratic system is simply 
starting to
fail. Not in terms of its democratic ideals, or some takeover by a Neocon
cabal, but by a simple collapse in its ability to count everyone's votes
accurately and fairly.

more on line:
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/columnists/story/0,,1866780,00.html

tiny url: http://tinyurl.com/k42q7

SEE ALSO. Report on PBS's NOW. "Down for the Count"
http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/236/index.html

goodbye,
Gary the Grouch gary100dm [AT] yahoo.com

Voter Security: http://www.blackboxvoting.org/

"Just because you do not take an interest in politics doesn't mean 
politics won't take an interest in you." -- Pericles






---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to