Israel and America Terrorize the World
By Howard Zinn

Alternet, September 9, 2006`

There is something important to be learned from the recent experience of the
United States and Israel in the Middle East: that massive military attacks,
inevitably indiscriminate, are not only morally reprehensible, but useless
in achieving the stated aims of those who carry them out.

The United States, in three years of war, which began with shock-and- awe
bombardment and goes on with day-to-day violence and chaos, has been an
utter failure in its claimed objective of bringing democracy and stability
to Iraq. The Israeli invasion and bombing of Lebanon has not brought
security to Israel; indeed it has increased the number of its enemies,
whether in Hezbollah or Hamas or among Arabs who belong to neither of those
groups.

I remember John Hersey's novel, "The War Lover," in which a macho American
pilot, who loves to drop bombs on people and also to boast about his sexual
conquests, turns out to be impotent. President Bush, strutting in his flight
jacket on an aircraft carrier and announcing victory in Iraq, has turned out
to be much like the Hersey character, his words equally boastful, his
military machine impotent.

The history of wars fought since the end of World War II reveals the
futility of large-scale violence. The United States and the Soviet Union,
despite their enormous firepower, were unable to defeat resistance movements
in small, weak nations -- the United States in Vietnam, the Soviet Union in
Afghanistan -- and were forced to withdraw.

Even the "victories" of great military powers turn out to be elusive.
Presumably, after attacking and invading Afghanistan, the president was able
to declare that the Taliban were defeated. But more than four years later,
Afghanistan is rife with violence, and the Taliban are active in much of the
country.

The two most powerful nations after World War II, the United States and the
Soviet Union, with all their military might, have not been able to control
events in countries that they considered to be in their sphere of
influence -- the Soviet Union in Eastern Europe and the United States in
Latin America.

Beyond the futility of armed force, and ultimately more important, is the
fact that war in our time inevitably results in the indiscriminate killing
of large numbers of people. To put it more bluntly, war is terrorism. That
is why a "war on terrorism" is a contradiction in terms. Wars waged by
nations, whether by the United States or Israel, are a hundred times more
deadly for innocent people than the attacks by terrorists, vicious as they
are.

The repeated excuse, given by both Pentagon spokespersons and Israeli
officials, for dropping bombs where ordinary people live is that terrorists
hide among civilians. Therefore the killing of innocent people (in Iraq, in
Lebanon) is called accidental, whereas the deaths caused by terrorists (on
9/11, by Hezbollah rockets) are deliberate.

This is a false distinction, quickly refuted with a bit of thought. If a
bomb is deliberately dropped on a house or a vehicle on the grounds that a
"suspected terrorist" is inside (note the frequent use of the word suspected
as evidence of the uncertainty surrounding targets), the resulting deaths of
women and children may not be intentional. But neither are they accidental.
The proper description is "inevitable."

So if an action will inevitably kill innocent people, it is as immoral as a
deliberate attack on civilians. And when you consider that the number of
innocent people dying inevitably in "accidental" events has been far, far
greater than all the deaths deliberately caused by terrorists, one must
reject war as a solution for terrorism.

For instance, more than a million civilians in Vietnam were killed by US
bombs, presumably by "accident." Add up all the terrorist attacks throughout
the world in the 20th century and they do not equal that awful toll.

If reacting to terrorist attacks by war is inevitably immoral, then we must
look for ways other than war to end terrorism, including the terrorism of
war. And if military retaliation for terrorism is not only immoral but
futile, then political leaders, however cold-blooded their calculations, may
have to reconsider their policies.

Howard Zinn is a professor emeritus at Boston University and the author of
the forthcoming book, "A Power Governments Cannot Suppress " (City Lights
Books, Winter 2007).

***

Counterpunch - Sep 14, 2006
http://www.counterpunch.org/lamb09142006.html

A Walk Through the Rubble:

Israel's Use of American Cluster Bombs

By FRANKLIN LAMB
Al Sultaneih, Lebanon.

According to Israeli soldiers, reported in the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz
on Sept. 13, the Israeli military launched over 1.2 million cluster bombs
into Lebanon, and used phosphorous shells as well -- "the overwhelming
majority used in the last ten days of the war." The use of phosphorous,
which causes excruciating burns, is prohibited under international law.

An Israeli rocket unit commander stated that because the Israeli rockets
are so imprecise, his unit was ordered to "flood" the area with them. The
soldiers said that during IDF training exercises live rockets are almost
never fired, to prevent leaving duds behind that would "fill the IDF's
firing grounds with mines." Yet, the soldiers said, Israeli forces in
Lebanon fired the rockets at ranges of less than 15 kilometers, "even
though the manufacturer's guidelines state that firing at this range
considerably increases the number of duds."

The rocket commander, who said he had complained to Israel's Defense
Minister but has received no response, stated: "In Lebanon, we covered
entire villages with cluster bombs. What we did there was crazy and
monstrous."

As the initial assessment and clean up of American cluster bombs, estimated
at more than 130,000 unexploded bomblets across the south of Lebanon, gets
underway, unanticipated findings are emerging:

The breadth and depth of the problem with cluster bombs found in 498
locations in scores of villages as of September 9th was not expected. So
far less than 4% have been disposed of, and 0 % of the villages in the
south have been certified as safe for domestic or agricultural use by the
United Nations ordnance disposal task force.

Even operators of heavy rubble clearing equipment are finding their work is
stymied because Israel dropped cluster bombs both before and after many
buildings were destroyed by bombs, and therefore cluster bombs are
sandwiched between layers of pancaked walls and piles of rubble.

While the M-26 Cluster Bomb Unit may have looked "promising" at military
demo shows when observed in ideal conditions of level, obstruction-free
open areas, using "polished bomblet" conditions, the reality is very
different in villages which are seeing not the military touted "dud rates"
in the 1% to 4% range, but rather "dud rates" in the 40-60% range. No
weapons with this performance statistic would be taken seriously at arms
sale outlets.

The U.S. cluster munitions dropped across Lebanon have been a near total
failure as far as their claimed purpose and justification, degrading
Hezbollah forces. Lebanese Army, UN, and Hezbollah sources agree the
Cluster Bombs had virtually no impact on Palestinian, Amal, and Hezbollah
fighters during the recent conflict.

One Hezbollah commander told this observer: "Maybe 3 or 4 [were killed] --
perhaps a few more I didn't hear about -- due to accidents by our forcesbut
unlike the civilian population, we have a long history of confronting the
Zionist aggressors and we often know what they will do before they do.
True, they have your country's latest weapons, but one-on-one they are not
impressive at all. Much more cowardly and incompetent than their propaganda
claimsplus they are very weak psychologically -- they know they stole
Palestine, and they realize that sooner or later they will have to make
peace, or they will destroy themselves and disappear from the region."

Another commander added, "My brothers can't wait for their [Israeli] troops
to enter Lebanon again on the ground. We are eager to hit them harder next
time. The Zionists' training has been used to using tanks against
stone-throwing children and harassing pregnant women at check points. We
now have the weapons to quickly destroy their tanks. That is why they
couldn't enter and finally accepted a ceasefire. We don't respect them
either as men or soldiers".

Yet another offered: "When we fire a rocket or series of rockets at their
weapon stockpiles or artillery positions in northern Palestine, our
brothers know that they have approximately 6-7 minutes to disappear --
usually underground. The Zionists place their weapons next to Arab
neighborhoods, where they have not provided shelters for the non-Jews. We
are accused of targeting civilians. This is not truewe know where their
weapons are exactly. They hide behind the civilians in northern Palestine
like they do in Gaza. Using the people as shields."

Other recent findings confirm that Israel may have dropped as many as 60 %
of the cluster bombs they used during July-August 2006 in the 72 hours
immediately before the ceasefire. Military analysts on the ground offer two
explanations:

1. Shear frustration, hatred, and rage by Israel's leadership and its
obsession with punishing Lebanon for its more than 85% support (including
Lebanon's middle class and Christian citizens) for Hezbollah's resistance
to Israel's attempted reoccupation up to the Litani River.

2. A desire by Israel to get rid of as much of its U.S. cluster bomb
inventory as possible, which the Pentagon has stipulated must be reduced to
a lower level before Israel can reorder newer models like the M-26. This is
why the 33 year old CBU-58, almost extinct, was used so widely. Israel was
cleaning out its CBU closet for new orders, one Lebanese army source
reported.

Senator Ted Stevens and those in the Senate who opposed banning cluster
bombs on Sept. 9 might want to reflect on what actual utility the US
cluster bombs used by Israel in Lebanon actually achieved.


[Dr. Franklin Lamb, an international lawyer and author of "Israel's War in
Lebanon: Eyewitness Chronicles of the Invasion and Occupation," is a
research associate at If Americans Knew. He can be reached at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]












---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to