From: "Ana Maria Ravines de Schur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Chavez Code: Cracking US Intervention in Venezuela (Paperback)
by Eva Golinger, Saul Landau (Foreword)

Book Description (from Amazon.com):
Perhaps no world leader is better placed to challenge the global authority 
of the United States than Hugo Chavez, the populist leader of Venezuela. As 
the head of one of the world's largest oil-producing countries, Chavez has 
been instrumental in raising world oil prices, undermining the control and 
profits of the multinational oil companies, and introducing innovative 
plans to use the wealth from this natural resource to help the 
impoverished-rather than the already powerful-in his own country and around 
the world. As the popularly elected president of one of South America's 
largest democracies, his strong resistance to the Bush administration's 
Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) has severely set back, if not 
derailed entirely, the US's long-held hemispheric agenda.

When in 2005 Bush ally and Christian fundamentalist Pat Robertson called 
for Chavez's assassination ("It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a 
war"), public outcry forced some questions: Was that, in fact, a CIA goal? 
Did the US have plans to invade Venezuela (as Chavez alluded to receiving 
intelligence about on Nightline in September 2005)? And exactly what was 
the extent of US knowledge of or involvement in the April 2002 coup against 
Chavez? (He was back in power within two days, after 250,000 took to the 
streets in Venezuela to protest.)

Venezuelan-American attorney Eva Golinger and journalist Jeremy Bigwood 
have used the US Freedom of Information Act to obtain government documents 
about US intervention in Venezuela. The Chavez Code contains this 
irrefutable evidence that, at the very least, the US knew about the plot to 
overthrow Chavez before it happened. The history of US interventions across 
Latin America, the suspicious blacked-out lines and pages, and the ongoing 
investigation suggest an even darker tale.

About the Author
Eva Golinger was educated at Sarah Lawrence College and the City University 
of New York Law School. Her investigation into US involvement in the coup 
against Chavez has been covered by major media throughout the US and in 
Venezuela. She divides her time between New York and Caracas. The Chavez 
Code is her first book.

http://www.voltairenet.org/article144261.html (spanish website)- machine 
translation of interview with Golinger follows:
Venezuela elections: interview with Eva Golinger
Bush continues plotting a blow against Chávez
by Sandro Cruz*
 From Europe, Eva Golinger, binational lawyer Venezuelan-American, advisor 
to president Hugo Chavez, amiably responded to the questions of the Network 
Voltaire about her last investigation that demonstrates that the Bush 
administration continues financing the subversion, plots in the bolivarian 
republic and also positioning military bases and equipments to only 50 
kilometers of Venezuela in the island of Curazao.

2 December of 2006

Photo left to right: the investigator and lawyer Eva Golinger; covers of 
its two books.
______________________________________________________

Sandro Cruz: Eva Golinger you are author of the book “the Chávez Code”, 
what could you say to us on the matter?

Eva Golinger: It is the result of an investigation that I've been doing 
since 2003, I gave the name of the Chávez Code to first [book] approach of 
this investigation, in this one [first book] is analyzed and the documents 
declassified appear that I obtained from the government of the U.S.A. under 
the law of access to the information (law FOIA) and in as we have the 
forceful evidence of the implication of the American government in the coup 
d'etat against the Venezuelan president [] Chávez, implication in the oil, 
economic sabotage that was that same final year [of 2002 - 2003 principles] 
and during revocatory referendum in August of 2004, that is to say, three 
stages different from American intervention [] in Venezuela.

The book the Chávez Code, is not an opinion book, but rather - like lawyer 
that I am, I present/display the evidence of the case so that the public 
opinion can appreciate by they themselves and who they can have in hand 
necessary documents that they demonstrate the different actions that the 
government of George W. Bush during the past few years in his attempts has 
had to overthrow president Chávez. It was also the first time that a book 
touched east subject and presented/displayed it evidences of all this since 
I have said (...) for example as Washington uses bottoms [in dollars] via 
American a state organism [] call NED (National for Endowment Democraty) to 
finance and to construct [to the interior of Venezuela] an opposition movement.

It is he himself model, pattern which they have used in [the past] in other 
countries, for example in Nicaragua that was the first time that did it. 
Through book the Chávez Code is explained in detail as it operates this 
strategy, as at the present time they execute it and how [worked and works] 
in Venezuela… (...), also the book presents/displays documents of the 
company in which it is deduced that the government of the U.S.A. knew 
everything of the detailed plans of the coup d'etat against Chávez, that is 
to say, not only were to as much but that was complicity, financing to 
those groups that gave to the blow (...) the book is a document that 
denounces the illegal activities of the Bush administration, I repeat, is 
not an opinion book just like my new intitulada publication: Bush against 
Chávez: the war of Washington against Venezuela.

Photo: American president George W. Bush haranguing to its troops in a 
speech against the “international terrorism” in the military base of 
Charleston, the U.S.A., the 28 of October 2006. (Photo U.S. DoD).
_____________________________________________________

Sandro Cruz: In how many languages was  the first book published?

Eva Golinger: It's been published in English, French, German, Italian and 
by all means in Castilian, in this last language there are four editions 
(two in Cuba and two in Venezuela), altogether more than 150.000 units and 
this year he gained the National Prize of Libro in Venezuela, that is the 
most important prize in the area of the letters in the country.

Sandro Cruz: What new features present/display the new investigation: “Bush 
against Chávez: the war of Washington against Venezuela”?

Eva Golinger: This new book [“Bush against Chávez: the war of Washington 
against Venezuela”] can be said that [comes to be the part two number or 
continuation] of the Chávez Code which finishes in 2004. My new book is 
information, are results of the continuation of my investigation, 
investigation that continuous until nowadays. When I finished writing the 
Chávez Code I continued investigating and receiving much more information. 
Also [presents/displays new American declassified documents] but the novel 
thing is that story this time with documents of the Venezuelan government 
related to the security groups as well as the testimonies of people who 
been have implied, involved in the last aggressions against Venezuela.

For example the Venezuelan case of paramilitary Colombians who I had the 
opportunity to interview, military or soldiers who were used by the 
American military as infiltrated spies… (...) are a book that informs about 
the last fronts of aggression and attack against Venezuela from year 2004, 
as much in the financial area - the increase of money [on the part of 
Washington] in the Venezuelan opposition [] and the narrow relation that 
maintains the government of Bush with the leaders of violent the extremist 
movements [] of this opposition.

Sandro Cruz: Enormous amounts of money arrive from the U.S.A. to finance to 
a Venezuelan opposition, so that the government of president Chávez does 
not prohibit these illegal practices that such the U.S.A. does not accept 
in their territory?

Eva Golinger: This is a very complicated situation, first [and is certain] 
that he is illegal in Venezuela as much that in other many countries to 
finance political campaigns, activities or parties by a foreign government, 
in the United States is illegal, but in the case of Venezuela, the few done 
attempts to prevent this class with intervention has been attacked and 
strongly manipulated by the American government international level [with 
its networks of commercial press and mediáticas] that distorts it and 
manages to convince to the world [with its powerful propaganda] that the 
Venezuela government this persecuting to its opposition when they are only 
trying to make respect the law [and the national sovereignty]. Then this 
situation is very complicated.

At the moment in Venezuela the Nacional Assembly [parliament] is debating a 
new law on and exactly the financing of these groups, ONGs (nongovernmental 
organizations) by a foreign government, but does not stop to prohibit them 
but rather to maintain a control and this is doing attacked very hard, at 
international level, by ONGs international and more than everything by the 
Department of State of the U.S.A. It is a difficult situation because the 
Venezuelan government either does not want to fall in the trap to leave are 
used his laws, his actions, so that they present/display it as if outside a 
dictatorship.

Sandro Cruz: You count in your new book the stranger and surprising 
experience that had in front of the American director of NED in a political 
congress in Sweden, could explain to us that it happened?

Eva Golinger: Indeed, I was invited by a political party of left of the 
Swedish parliament to ironically participate to an international conference 
by the World-wide Movement by the Democracy in Stockholm (Sweden), 
conference organized peculiarly and by filial NED [of the company - the 
U.S.A.]. As the Swedish participated to this international conference and 
as each Swedish political party (they are seven) had right to invite a 
person to present/display a communication, then Swedish [of left] invited 
to me and when the American organizers [] found out, even though that or my 
communication had been approved, that or had confirmation, aerial passage 
and all the others, the organizers (NED), before notified one week to me, 
that had been removed from the panel of lecturers, who could not 
present/display no communication but that if he could participate like a 
public spectator. They did not give any explanation me.


Photo: Carl Gershman, director of NED, a American agency that under the 
cover to foment the democracy in the world is dedicated to foment the 
destabilization of governments who do not respond to the imperial interests 
of Washington.
_____________________________________________________

When I arrived at Stockholm, the members of the Swedish party of left 
inform that the reason of all this came from the president of NED, he 
himself Carl to me Gershman, who when it found out that I was going to be 
in he himself panel who he like exhibitor, did not want that I spoke. 
During the encounter, the other participants found out this situation and 
many were against, since the subject was to promote the democracy [ and 
prevented me to speak], then they insisted so that they put to me again in 
the panel but they refused it again. The surprising thing was that once 
Carl Gershman finished pronouncing his speech I asked like public saying to 
him that I was the person whom had excluded, that NED, instead of 
fulfilling their “noble mission to promote the democracy” is subvirtiendo 
the democracy and he became, could crazy congress in the heat of, having 
declared that:
the simple fact to think that I must share a platform with Eva Golinger 
gives a repulsion me.

Sandro Cruz: Which was the impression of the Swedish and of the public in 
general after to have listened to the aberrations of the director of NED?

Eva Golinger: It was really rather a success for me because everybody 
realized which NED and Carl Gershman who is president of this organization 
are authoritarian, something very in opposition to the democratic values 
and many remained surprised with the high level of aggressiveness, of rage 
that had that gentleman against my person, against the subject of Venezuela.

Sandro Cruz: Eva Golinger, changing of subject, also has found interesting 
information about the island of Curazao, island located in front of 
Venezuela and that is being used as military base by the U.S.A. for its 
operations [of aggression] against Venezuela…

Eva Golinger: Curazao and Venezuela have good relations [always have had 
it], in that sense from government to government and from town to town, 
which happens is that Curazao is a very poor island [of resources], very 
employees of two industries: the tourism that are very little and the 
petroleum related to the refinery that [Curazao] has and that from year 
1985 has rented it company to the Venezuelan state petroleum (PDVSA). In 
1999, the government of Curazao signed an agreement with the government of 
the U.S.A. to allow to an air base [military man] in his island and for 
[pretext] to help in the fight against the drug trafficking. That also must 
because that year the U.S.A. was forced to close the Harwad base in Panama, 
that was a very great base, then also opened a small one in Aruba, in 
Blanket (Ecuador) and El Salvador. Curazao has a particularitity, that as 
island is the greatest port of the world, can berth enormous ships.

Photo: US navy operating in Curazao, above USS Saipan, down, the aircraft 
carrier George Washington.
_____________________________________________________

Sandro Cruz: Speech that American boats military already are operating in 
that port like USS Saipan…

Eva Golinger: Curazao is to less than 50 kilometers of the Venezuelan 
coast, with good weather can even be seen Curazao from the Venezuelan 
coasts, in a small plane is arrived in ten minutes, [and militarily] can 
easily be sent from the island a missile towards Venezuela. They have 
happened many peculiar things as much the last year as at the moment, for 
example the government of the U.S.A. has already made four military 
maneuverses during the months of March, April, May and June of 2006 and one 
dimension that had not been seen from the time of the Cold War.

In one of these exercises called “Operation Society of the Américas” they 
brought four ships military, an aircraft carrier (George Washington) with 
6.500 soldiers attack only of this aircraft carrier, almost 100 airplanes 
battle, Tomahow missile launcher and all those things, supposedly for [to 
intimidate] maneuvers of a hypothetical terrorist threat in the zone. What 
happens? At the same time which that these American military exercises are 
passing [] as opposed to the Venezuelan coasts, the Department of State of 
the U.S.A., at rhetorical level is classifying to Venezuela like a country 
that do not collaborate with the fight against the terrorism, treating to 
tie to Venezuela with countries that the U.S.A. or it has classified like 
terrorist states, for example Iran, Korea of the North, Syria and Cuba with 
as Venezuela mainly has relations as well as with many other states at 
commercial or cultural level like Cuba.

Then, in Curazao an increase of the presence of different companies has 
been seen the last year and the American military, who have even bought 
businesses strategic to handle to the infrastructure of the country 
[Curazao], electricity, water, telephone, telecommunications, hotels, 
banks, insurances and at the same time are trying through a tie company to 
the Bush family and the oil tankers of Texas, trying to clear the business 
to him from the refinery to PDVSA, being bought it so that they assume the 
total control and of expelling to Venezuela from the island [Curazao]. This 
is a danger for the inhabitants of Curazao who are used as point of the 
spear against Venezuela, already is being used [the island], with 
propaganda in mass media in the island that says that Chávez wants to 
invade the country. It is a worrisome situation by the proximity to 
Venezuela, but also because Curazao as independent country and with a so 
rich culture is falling in a trap of being used of this form to commit 
aggressions [and to serve as platform] against a neighboring country.

Sandro Cruz: You whereas citizen Venezuelan and American, like connoisseur 
of these two cultures, of these two countries and in where has lived, that 
can say to us of the American public opinion (we know that the information 
very is controlled and manipulated by means in the U.S.A.), but I know gets 
to give to account the North American public opinion of this perfidia? 
Where is that spirit of civic fight, those movement social of protest 
against the abuses of Washington, how for example the pacifist movement 
that as much characterized to the North American society during the war of 
Vietnam in the university fields?

Eva Golinger: Those [broad] movements no longer exist nowadays in the 
United States, which are very small movements, valiant, that conserve that 
spirit revolutionary and humanist but they are very small. In addition by 
the experience which they have the American bodies of security already 
[secret services] know to control them and to suppress. That was what 
happened with the social movements in the years 60 and 70 that were 
infiltrated by a program of counterintelligence of destroyed FBI and, its 
assassinated leaders.

 From that time [has not been able to grow none new] strong movement in the 
U.S.A. On the other hand also, a majority of the population is drugged by 
the consumption, and with the media manipulation, the total control of the 
information in the United States, if they do not know what it is happening 
within its country like can know what [is passing abroad (...) a lack total 
of objective information], an ignorance, an ignorance that could be said is 
chosen, that is to say, that the own town to a great extent prefers to stay 
in that ignorance instead of demanding, to question [one better 
information], to wake up conscience [of which is passing], because that 
means that] would really have to change to their style of life [their 
system, because the world [cannot to reproduce that model of consumption], 
the planet ecologically does not hold [] another system like this… (...) 
that level of consumption ends the world (...) to demand forceful changes 
and structural they would have to change that form to live and that would 
affect the comfort of many people and everything seems that they are not 
arranged to make that type of sacrifices (...) but the moment will arrive 
at which they will be confronted to the planetary reality.

Sandro Cruz: And how expert also of the Venezuelan world critical what 
would do to him to the movement Revolutionary Bolivariano? It is not 
needing organization?

Eva Golinger: Good, first I clarify that there are many different cultures 
in the world, Venezuela is not just like Europe, then perhaps when 
organization speech, you are spoken of an European concept of which she is 
the organization, or the same in the U.S.A. (...) it is certain that the 
Venezuelans do not organize themselves in the same way that the European, 
but they have their own models of organization.

We could say [on the other hand to criticize] that one better coordination 
inside needs the Bolivariana Revolution and that is working of an optical 
way [] Venezuelan, not with European perspective, neither American nor no 
other part (...) because the Latin Americans work of another way (...) 
perhaps this is something difficult d to accept for many European that all 
do not work according to [patterns or anglian-European models] (...) the 
Venezuelans look for the way to obtain their objectives, we are in a 
process of changes, is fighting bureaucracy, deficiency, corruption, things 
thus. I insist, about no Venezuela moment thinks to have a culture [models] 
destined for European or American, they are rather looking for to rescue 
[the Venezuelan values] (...)

We are very self-critical, because the only form to improve and to surpass 
the difficulties, the errors and the problems is being self-critical. 
President Chávez is first in criticizing the bureaucracy, the inefficiency 
and the lack of unit, for example the internal divisions that exist.
        Sandro Cruz
Journalist, coordinator of the Network Voltaire. He founded the news agency 
Latin America the IPI.



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to