http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20070102_robert_scheer_a_monster_of_our_creation/

Truthdig: Jan 2, 2007

"Those deeply unsavory connections between Saddam and the United States
would
have been exposed in any honest trial.  Presumably, this is the real reason
why the Bush administration so assiduously undermined any equitable judicial
accounting of Saddam's criminality, right through his shamefully and
illegally-rushed execution." -Scheer


A Monster of Our Creation

By Robert Scheer

Someone has to say it: The hanging of Saddam Hussein was an act
of barbarism that makes a mockery of President Bush's claim it was
"an important milestone on Iraq's course to becoming a democracy."

Instead, the rushed, illegal and unruly execution of a former U.S. ally
after his conviction in a kangaroo court blurred the line between terrorist
and terrorized as effectively as Saddam's own evil propaganda ever did.

In the most generous interpretation, the frantic killing of Saddam abetted
by the United States was the third act in a morality play of misplaced
vengeance for the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks- in which the first act was the
invasion of Iraq, based on trumped-up lies linking it to al-Qaida, and the
second was the killing of the tyrant's sons, whose bloody corpses were
hypocritically displayed to the world like war scalps.

At worst, the handling of Saddam is just another example of an Imperial
America under President Bush that recognizes no boundaries of national
sovereignty or any restraint of international law.  A nation that posed no
threat to U.S. security was conquered for a range of base motives, from oil
plunder to industrial profits to naked political gain.  Of course, these are
the same rationales that despots always use to explain their murderous wars,
such as Saddam's genocidal invasion of Iran and greedy occupation of Kuwait.

The president says the execution was warranted because Saddam received a
fair trial even after Bush decided to bypass an international tribunal
designed to handle such trials of national rulers and instead turn Saddam
over to Iraq's dominant partisan faction in the midst of a nascent civil
war.  While Saddam's guilt of "crimes against humanity" may have been
accurate, it was not, in fact, established by his trial, which was pushed
through even as his lawyers were being assassinated.  This, quite opposite
to the spirit of the Nuremberg war crime trials (established by the United
States but not repeated today by President Bush), where the accused had
competent and unintimidated attorneys, free to make a complete case.

The trial dealt only with alleged crimes that occurred in the Shiite village
of Dujail after an assassination attempt on Saddam.  His bloody reprisals
occurred 15 months before Donald Rumsfeld, then President Ronald Reagan's
emissary, traveled to Baghdad to initiate an alliance with Saddam.  Rumsfeld
conceded in classified memos that he was familiar with Saddam's unsavory
past, yet advocated forming an alliance with the dictator.

In fact, the most heinous crimes allegedly committed by Saddam, including
the use of poison gas against Shiite Iraqis he suspected of being
sympathetic to his Shiite enemies in Iran, were carried out during the years
that he was our ally.  With the United States having now put Iraqi Shiites
with long political, military and ideological ties to those same Iranian
ayatollahs into power in Baghdad, the bizarre circle of this foreign policy
disaster is now complete, with Saddam's broken neck a fitting coda.

The video images now broadcast widely on the Internet show, as The New York
Times reported, that the execution proceedings deteriorated "into a
sectarian free-for-all that had the effect . . . of making [Saddam] appear
dignified and restrained, and his executioners, representing Shiites, who
were his principal victims, seem like bullying street thugs." As the
executioners chanted "Moqtada! Moqtada! Moqtada!," in reference to death
squad leader Moqtada al Sadr, Saddam may have claimed for his Sunni
followers an undeserved martyrdom.

"Is that how real men behave?" Saddam asked, smiling contemptuously.  In the
end, Sadr was presented figuratively with the head of Saddam by reluctant
U.S. officials-the former dictator was in U.S. custody, after all-in order
to placate the Shiite radicals running Iraq, even though Iraqi law bans
executions on this past weekend's religious holiday and Iraqi President
Jalal Talabani refused to sign a decree upholding the death sentence, as is
required by the country's new constitution.

Fittingly, U.S. officials appeared in this spectacle as hapless Keystone
Kops, morally implicated by their tepid support of a lynch mob.  It
perfectly mirrors decades of U.S. meddling in the history of Iraq, beginning
with U.S. support for Saddam's Baath Party when it overthrew Iraqi
nationalist Abdul Karim Qassem because we feared he was tilting ever so
slightly to the Soviets.  In fact, Saddam, like Osama bin Laden and the
other Islamist fanatics our CIA recruited and helped to wage holy war
against the Soviets, was a monster at least partially of our creation.

Those deeply unsavory connections between Saddam and the United States would
have been exposed in any honest trial.  Presumably, this is the real reason
why the Bush administration so assiduously undermined any equitable judicial
accounting of Saddam's criminality, right through his shamefully and
illegally rushed execution.

***

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article16063.htm

Iraq Vets Left in Physical and Mental Agony

By Aaron Glantz

01/04/07 -- - SAN FRANCISCO, California, Jan 3 (IPS) - On New Year's Eve,
the number of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq passed 3,000. By Tuesday, the
death toll had reached 3,004 -- 31 more than died in the Sep. 11 attacks on
the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon.

But the number of injured has far outstripped the dead, with the Veterans
Administration reporting that more than 150,000 veterans of the Iraq war are
receiving disability benefits.

Advances in military technology are keeping the death rate much lower than
during the Vietnam War and World War Two, Dr. Col. Vito Imbascini, an
urologist and state surgeon with the California Army National Guard, told
IPS, but soldiers who survive attacks are often severely disabled for life.

"If you lost an arm or a leg in Vietnam, you were also tremendously injured
in your chest and abdomen, which were not protected by the armour plates
back then," he said. "Now, your heart and chest and lungs and heart are
protected by armour, leaving only your extremities exposed."

Dr. Imbascini just returned from a four-month deployment to Germany, where
he treated the worst of the U.S. war wounded. He said that an extremely high
number of wounded soldiers are coming home with their arms or legs
amputated. Imbascini said he amputated the genitals of one or two men every
day.

"I walk into the operating room and the general surgeons are doing their
work and there is the body of this Navy SEAL, which is a physical specimen
to behold," he told IPS. "And his abdomen is open, they're exploring both
intestines. He's missing both legs below the knee, one arm is blown off,
he's got incisions on his thighs to relieve the pressure on the parts of the
legs that are hopefully gonna survive and there's genital injuries, and you
just want to cry."

According to documents obtained by the National Security Archive at George
Washington University, 25 percent of veterans of the "global war on terror"
have filed disability compensation and pension benefit claims with the
Veterans Benefits Administration.

One is a Jul. 20, 2006, document titled "Compensation and Pension Benefit
Activity Among Veterans of the Global War on Terrorism," which shows that
152,669 veterans filed disability claims after fighting in Iraq or
Afghanistan. Of the more than 100,000 claims granted, Veterans
Administration records show at least 1,502 veterans have been compensated as
100 percent disabled.

Pentagon studies show that 12 percent of soldiers who have served in Iraq
suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder. The group Veterans for America,
formerly the Vietnam Veterans of America Foundation, estimates 70,000 Iraq
war veterans have gone to the VA for mental health care.

New guidelines released by the Pentagon released last month allow commanders
to redeploy soldiers suffering from traumatic stress disorders.

According to the military newspaper Stars and Stripes, servicemembers with
"a psychiatric disorder in remission, or whose residual symptoms do not
impair duty performance" may be considered for duty downrange. It lists
post-traumatic stress disorder as a "treatable" problem.

"As a layman and a former soldier I think that's ridiculous," Steve
Robinson, the director of Veterans Affairs for Veterans for America, told
IPS.

"If I've got a soldier who's on Ambien to go to sleep and Seroquel and
Qanapin and all kinds of other psychotropic meds, I don't want them to have
a weapon in their hand and to be part of my team because they're a risk to
themselves and to others," he said. "But apparently, the military has its
own view of how well a soldier can function under those conditions and is
gambling that they can be successful."

Robinson said problems with the policy are already starting to arise.

On Christmas, for example, Army Reservist James Dean barricaded himself in
his father's home with several weapons and threatened to kill himself. After
a 14-hour standoff with authorities, Dean was killed by a police officer
after he aimed a gun at another officer, authorities told the Washington
Post.

Veterans for America's Robinson told IPS that Dean, who had already served
18 months in Afghanistan, had been diagnosed with PTSD. He had just been
informed that his unit would be sent to Iraq on Jan. 14.

"We call that suicide by cop," Robinson said.

After his death, Dean's friends told the Washington Post that the reservist
enjoyed hunting and fishing but had lost much of his enthusiasm for life
when he found out that he was being deployed to Iraq.

"When Congress comes back in session we're looking forward to accountability
hearings," Robinson said. "We want to see veterans helped in the first 100
hours of the new session. We want to see the word 'veteran' somewhere in
that first hundred hours."

Robinson says his organisation has also documented the existence of at least
1,000 homeless veterans of the Iraq war.

"We need to get on top of the problem of homelessness," he said. "It's too
soon to be seeing homelessness. I want to be seeing a commitment from the
Democratic Congress to dealing with the war and the needs of the soldiers in
the first hundred hours of them coming to power."

Copyright © 2007 IPS-Inter Press Service




---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to