Dear Friends,

April 4th, is the third anniversary of the death of Casey Sheehan, son of
Peace Mom, Cindy Sheehan:  www.gsfp.org

Hope you can tune in at 2:00 PM, Pacific time (90.7 FM KPFK in LA and:
www.kpfk.org for those outside) as

 Profiles in Peace explores the life of this brave woman of destiny.

And I hope you'll take a moment to honor Cindy, Casey, Dr. Martin
Luther King
 (who was also killed on April 4) and Peacemakers everywhere.

Peace and Love,

Doreen Key
===

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17470.htm

The botched US raid that led to the hostage crisis

Exclusive Report: How a bid to kidnap Iranian security officials sparked a
diplomatic crisis

By Patrick Cockburn

04/03/07 "The Independent" -- - A failed American attempt to abduct two
senior Iranian security officers on an official visit to northern Iraq was
the starting pistol for a crisis that 10 weeks later led to Iranians seizing
15 British sailors and Marines.

Early on the morning of 11 January, helicopter-born US forces launched a
surprise raid on a long-established Iranian liaison office in the city of
Arbil in Iraqi Kurdistan. They captured five relatively junior Iranian
officials whom the US accuses of being intelligence agents and still holds.

In reality the US attack had a far more ambitious objective, The Independent
has learned. The aim of the raid, launched without informing the Kurdish
authorities, was to seize two men at the very heart of the Iranian security
establishment.

Better understanding of the seriousness of the US action in Arbil - and the
angry Iranian response to it - should have led Downing Street and the
Ministry of Defence to realise that Iran was likely to retaliate against
American or British forces such as highly vulnerable Navy search parties in
the Gulf. The two senior Iranian officers the US sought to capture were
Mohammed Jafari, the powerful deputy head of the Iranian National Security
Council, and General Minojahar Frouzanda, the chief of intelligence of the
Iranian Revolutionary Guard, according to Kurdish officials.

The two men were in Kurdistan on an official visit during which they met the
Iraqi President, Jalal Talabani, and later saw Massoud Barzani, the
President of the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG), at his mountain
headquarters overlooking Arbil.

"They were after Jafari," Fuad Hussein, the chief of staff of Massoud
Barzani, told The Independent. He confirmed that the Iranian office had been
established in Arbil for a long time and was often visited by Kurds
obtaining documents to visit Iran. "The Americans thought he [Jafari] was
there," said Mr Hussein.

Mr Jafari was accompanied by a second, high-ranking Iranian official. "His
name was General Minojahar Frouzanda, the head of intelligence of the
Pasdaran [Iranian Revolutionary Guard]," said Sadi Ahmed Pire, now head of
the Diwan (office) of President Talabani in Baghdad. Mr Pire previously
lived in Arbil, where he headed the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), Mr
Talabani's political party.

The attempt by the US to seize the two high-ranking Iranian security
officers openly meeting with Iraqi leaders is somewhat as if Iran had tried
to kidnap the heads of the CIA and MI6 while they were on an official visit
to a country neighbouring Iran, such as Pakistan or Afghanistan. There is no
doubt that Iran believes that Mr Jafari and Mr Frouzanda were targeted by
the Americans. Mr Jafari confirmed to the official Iranian news agency,
IRNA, that he was in Arbil at the time of the raid.

In a little-noticed remark, Manouchehr Mottaki, the Iranian Foreign
Minister, told IRNA: "The objective of the Americans was to arrest Iranian
security officials who had gone to Iraq to develop co-operation in the area
of bilateral security."

US officials in Washington subsequently claimed that the five Iranian
officials they did seize, who have not been seen since, were "suspected of
being closely tied to activities targeting Iraq and coalition forces". This
explanation never made much sense. No member of the US-led coalition has
been killed in Arbil and there were no Sunni-Arab insurgents or Shia
militiamen there.

The raid on Arbil took place within hours of President George Bush making an
address to the nation on 10 January in which he claimed: "Iran is providing
material support for attacks on American troops." He identified Iran and
Syria as America's main enemies in Iraq though the four-year-old guerrilla
war against US-led forces is being conducted by the strongly anti-Iranian
Sunni-Arab community. Mr Jafari himself later complained about US
allegations. "So far has there been a single Iranian among suicide bombers
in the war-battered country?" he asked. "Almost all who involved in the
suicide attacks are from Arab countries."

It seemed strange at the time that the US would so openly flout the
authority of the Iraqi President and the head of the KRG simply to raid an
Iranian liaison office that was being upgraded to a consulate, though this
had not yet happened on 11 January. US officials, who must have been privy
to the White House's new anti-Iranian stance, may have thought that bruised
Kurdish pride was a small price to pay if the US could grab such senior
Iranian officials.

For more than a year the US and its allies have been trying to put pressure
on Iran. Security sources in Iraqi Kurdistan have long said that the US is
backing Iranian Kurdish guerrillas in Iran. The US is also reportedly
backing Sunni Arab dissidents in Khuzestan in southern Iran who are opposed
to the government in Tehran. On 4 February soldiers from the Iraqi army 36th
Commando battalion in Baghdad, considered to be under American control,
seized Jalal Sharafi, an Iranian diplomat.

The raid in Arbil was a far more serious and aggressive act. It was not
carried out by proxies but by US forces directly. The abortive Arbil raid
provoked a dangerous escalation in the confrontation between the US and Iran
which ultimately led to the capture of the 15 British sailors and Marines -
apparently considered a more vulnerable coalition target than their American
comrades.

The targeted generals

* MOHAMMED JAFARI

Powerful deputy head of the Iranian National Security Council, responsible
for internal security. He has accused the United States of seeking to "hold
Iran responsible for insecurity in Iraq... and [US] failure in the country."

* GENERAL MINOJAHAR FROUZANDA

Chief of intelligence of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, the military unit
which maintains its own intelligence service separate from the state, as
well as a parallel army, navy and air force

© 2007 Independent News and Media Limited

***

http://politics.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,2047110,00.html>

The Guardian    Saturday March 31, 2007

Call that humiliation?

No hoods. No electric shocks. No beatings. These
Iranians clearly are a very uncivilised bunch

By Terry Jones

I share the outrage expressed in the British press over the treatment of our
naval personnel accused by Iran of illegally entering their waters. It is a
disgrace. We would never dream of treating captives like this - allowing
them to smoke cigarettes, for example, even though it has been proven that
smoking kills. And as for compelling poor servicewoman Faye Turney to wear a
black headscarf, and then allowing the picture to be posted around the world
- have the Iranians no concept of civilised behaviour? For God's sake,
what's wrong with putting a bag over her head? That's what we do with the
Muslims we capture: we put bags over their heads, so it's hard to breathe.
Then it's perfectly acceptable to take photographs of them and circulate
them to the press because the captives can't be recognised and humiliated in
the way these unfortunate British service people are.

It is also unacceptable that these British captives should be made to talk
on television and say things that they may regret later. If the Iranians put
duct tape over their mouths, like we do to our captives, they wouldn't be
able to talk at all. Of course they'd probably find it even harder to
breathe - especially with a bag over their head - but at least they wouldn't
be humiliated.

And what's all this about allowing the captives to write letters home saying
they are all right? It's time the Iranians fell into line with the rest of
the civilised world: they should allow their captives the privacy of
solitary confinement. That's one of the many privileges the US grants to its
captives in Guantánamo Bay.

The true mark of a civilised country is that it doesn't rush into charging
people whom it has arbitrarily arrested in places it's just invaded. The
inmates of Guantánamo, for example, have been enjoying all the privacy they
want for almost five years, and the first inmate has only just been charged.
What a contrast to the disgraceful Iranian rush to parade their captives
before the cameras!

What's more, it is clear that the Iranians are not giving their British
prisoners any decent physical exercise. The US military make sure that their
Iraqi captives enjoy PT. This takes the form of exciting "stress positions",
which the captives are expected to hold for hours on end so as to improve
their stomach and calf muscles. A common exercise is where they are made to
stand on the balls of their feet and then squat so that their thighs are
parallel to the ground. This creates intense pain and, finally, muscle
failure. It's all good healthy fun and has the bonus that the captives will
confess to anything to get out of it.

And this brings me to my final point. It is clear from her TV appearance
that servicewoman Turney has been put under pressure. The newspapers have
persuaded behavioural psychologists to examine the footage and they all
conclude that she is "unhappy and stressed".

What is so appalling is the underhand way in which the Iranians have got her
"unhappy and stressed". She shows no signs of electrocution or burn marks
and there are no signs of beating on her face. This is unacceptable. If
captives are to be put under duress, such as by forcing them into
compromising sexual positions, or having electric shocks to their genitals,
they should be photographed, as they were in Abu Ghraib. The photographs
should then be circulated around the civilised world so that everyone can
see exactly what has been going on.

As Stephen Glover pointed out in the Daily Mail, perhaps it would not be
right to bomb Iran in retaliation for the humiliation of our servicemen, but
clearly the Iranian people must be made to suffer - whether by beefing up
sanctions, as the Mail suggests, or simply by getting President Bush to
hurry up and invade, as he intends to anyway, and bring democracy and
western values to the country, as he has in Iraq.

. Terry Jones is a film director, actor and Python www.terry-jones.net



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to