v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}  o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}  
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}  .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}        
st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }                 
http://www.lewrockwell.com/buchanan/buchanan67.html
   
  Phase III of Bush's War  by Patrick J. Buchanan
by Patrick J. Buchanan 
  Those who hoped that – with the victory of the antiwar party in 2006, the 
departure of Rumsfeld and the neocons from the Pentagon, the rise of Condi and 
the eclipse of Cheney – America was headed out of Iraq got a rude awakening. 
They are about to get another. 
  Today, the United States has 30,000 more troops in Iraq than on the day 
America repudiated the Bush war policy and voted the GOP out of power. And 
President Bush, self-confidence surging, is now employing against Iran a 
bellicosity redolent of the days just prior to Operation Iraqi Freedom. 
  What gives Bush his new cockiness? The total collapse of the antiwar 
coalition on Capitol Hill and the breaking of the Congress. 
  Last spring, Bush vetoed the congressional deadlines for troop withdrawals, 
then rubbed Congress' nose in its defeat by demanding and getting $100 billion 
to support the surge and continue the war. 
  Before the August recess, Democrats broke again and voted to give Bush the 
warrantless wiretap authority many among them had said was an unconstitutional 
and impeachable usurpation of power. They are a broken and frightened lot. 
  Comes now evidence congressional Democrats have not only lost the pro-victory 
vote, but forfeited the peace vote, as well.
  According to a Zogby poll the last week in August, just two weeks before Gen. 
Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker report, Americans, by 45 percent to 20 percent, 
give this Democratic Congress lower grades on handling the war than the 
Republican Congress it replaced. 
  Fifty-four percent of the nation believes, contra Harry Reid, the war is not 
lost. That is twice the support that Bush enjoys for his war leadership, a 
paltry 27 percent. But, by nine to one, Bush's leadership on the war is 
preferred to that of the Congress of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. 
  Incredibly, only 3 percent of the nation gives Congress a positive rating on 
its handling of the war. Congress has lost the hawks, and the owls, and the 
doves. No one trusts its leadership on the war. 
  And George W. smells it. He no longer fears the power of Congress, and his 
rhetoric suggests he is contemptuous of it. He is brimming with self-assurance 
that he can break any Democratic attempt to impose deadlines for troop 
withdrawal and force Congress to cough up all the funds he demands. 
  Confident of victory this fall on the Hill, Bush is now moving into Phase III 
in his War on Terror: First, Afghanistan, then Iraq, then Iran. 
  Do not take this writer's word for it. Hearken to the astonishing rhetoric 
Bush used at the American Legion Convention in Las Vegas against Tehran: 
  "Iran ... is the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism. ... Iran funds 
terrorist groups like Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, which murder the 
innocent and target Israel. ... Iran is sending arms to the Taliban. ... Iran 
has arrested visiting American scholars who have committed no crimes. ... 
Iran's active pursuit of technology that could lead to nuclear weapons 
threatens to put a region already known for instability and violence under the 
shadow of a nuclear holocaust. 
  "Iran's actions threaten the security of nations everywhere. ... We will 
confront this danger before it is too late." 
  Bush has repeatedly warned Iran to cease supplying Iraqi insurgents with arms 
and enhanced IEDs for attacks on our troops in Iraq. 
  How has Tehran responded to Bush's virtual ultimatums? 
  "The attacks on our bases and our troops by Iranian-supplied munitions have 
increased in the last few months – despite pledges by Iran to help stabilize 
the security situation in Iraq. ... 
  "Iran's leaders cannot escape responsibility for aiding attacks against 
coalition forces and the murder of innocent Iraqis." 
  This is a case for war. Indeed, it's an assertion by President Bush that Iran 
is colluding in acts of war against the soldiers and Marines and allies of the 
United States. What does he intend to do? 
  "I have authorized our military commanders in Iraq to confront Tehran's 
murderous activities. ... We've conducted operations against Iranian agents 
supplying lethal munitions to extremist groups." 
  This suggests that U.S. forces may already be engaged in combat operations 
against Iranians.
  Who or what can stop this drive to war? 
  Last spring, Nancy Pelosi herself, after a call from the Israeli lobby, 
pulled an amendment that would have forced Bush to come to Congress for 
specific authorization before attacking Iran. Before the August recess, the 
Senate voted 97 to zero for a resolution sponsored by Joe Lieberman to censure 
Iran for complicity in the killing of U.S. soldiers in Iraq.
  The resolution explicitly rejected authorization for immediate military 
action, but the gist of it declared that Iran is participating in acts of war 
against the United States, laying the foundation for a confrontation. 
  What is to prevent Bush from attacking Iran and widening the war, at a time 
and place of his choosing, and sooner than we think? 
  Nothing and no one.
  September 3, 2007
  Patrick J. Buchanan [send him mail] is co-founder and editor of The American 
Conservative. He is also the author of seven books, including Where the Right 
Went Wrong, and A Republic Not An Empire.
  Copyright © 2007 Creators Syndicate
   
   
  P Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this 
e-mail
   
    Save paper - do you need to print this email if you can.
   



       
---------------------------------
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! 
Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to