Date: Friday, July 23, 2010, 12:01 PM



Just Foreign Policy News
July 23, 2010

Just Foreign Policy News on the Web: 
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/node/655

[To receive just the Summary and a link to the web version, you can use this 
webform:
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/switchdailynews]

KPFK Uprising: The U.S.-U.K. "Special Relationship" 
Just Foreign Policy talks with Sonali Kolhatkar and argues that the US-UK 
"special relationship," in which Britain is expected to collaborate with U.S. 
wars even when they are unpopular and illegal, is in the interest of the 
majority in neither country.
http://uprisingradio.org/home/?p=14541

Urge Your Rep. to Vote No on the War Supplemental 
The war supplemental for Afghanistan is expected to come back to the House next 
week - without any kind of timetable for military withdrawal from Afghanistan, 
and without money to save teachers' jobs attached. Urge your Representative to 
vote no on the war supplemental. FCNL has established a toll-free number: 
1-888-493-5443. If you use this number, it will add to FCNL's count of how many 
people called Congress against the war supplemental, so your call will make two 
marks.

Don't Let Petraeus Sabotage Afghan Peace Talks 
54% of Americans want the U.S. to establish a timetable for military withdrawal 
from Afghanistan, CBS News reports. But if General Petraeus has his way, the 
U.S. will dig in deeper. Petraeus wants the State Department to designate part 
of the Afghan Taliban as a "foreign terrorist organization," which, as the New 
York Times noted, would undermine Afghan government efforts to end the war 
through political reconciliation with the Taliban - efforts that the U.S. 
claims that it supports [see e.g. Guardian story, below]. Urge your 
representatives in Congress to oppose Petraeus' "backdoor escalation" to 
prolong the war.
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/act/petraeus

South of the Border, scheduled screenings: 
http://southoftheborderdoc.com/in-theatres/

Support the Work of Just Foreign Policy 
Your financial support allows us to educate Americans about U.S. foreign policy 
and to create opportunities for Americans to advocate for U.S. policies that 
are more just.
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/donate.html

Summary:
U.S./Top News 
1) The absence of serious progress in Afghanistan this year has sown new 
doubts, here and abroad, that Obama will be able to reach even the scaled-down 
goals he set in the time he laid out seven months ago, writes David Sanger in 
the New York Times. Obama has begun losing critical political figures and 
strategists who are increasingly vocal in arguing that the benefits of 
continuing on the current course for at least another year, and probably 
longer, are greatly outweighed by the escalating price. Democrats in Congress 
have been holding up billions of dollars in additional financing for the war, 
longer than they ever delayed similar requests from President Bush. The allies, 
voicing similar concerns, have abandoned most talk of a conditions-based 
withdrawal in favor of harder timetables. Senior White House officials who a 
few months ago said that this would be "the year of Kandahar" now acknowledge 
that the chances of progress there are growing more
 remote.

2) Jewish Voice for Peace is petitioning TIAA-CREF to divest from holdings in 
companies that profit from Israel's occupation of Gaza and the West Bank, 
including East Jerusalem, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency reports. Among the 
companies listed are Caterpillar, Motorola, Northrop Grumman, Veolia and Elbit.

3) A report from Senator Lugar warns that the U.S. risks wasting the aid it is 
offering Haiti, the Wall Street Journal reports. The Haitian government has 
failed to make basic reforms such as ensuring transparent elections and 
reducing barriers for private investment, the report says. 

4) The U.S. military said Thursday that it will resume relations with 
Indonesia's special forces, Kopassus, angering human rights groups, the 
Washington Post reports. Under US law, the US is prohibited from having contact 
with foreign military units that have a pattern of human rights violations and 
have resisted efforts to hold abusers accountable. Indonesia has convicted 
about a dozen Kopassus officers for abuses. But advocacy groups noted that many 
have been allowed to return to duty, including some who have taken senior 
positions in the Indonesian military.

5) A group of lawmakers has launched a campaign to further cut the U.S. 
military presence in Europe and Asia, Stars and Stripes reports. Rep. Frank and 
several other lawmakers are calling for the elimination of one Air Force 
fighter wing overseas, one Army brigade combat team in Europe and two 
reinforced Marine Corps infantry battalions in Okinawa as part of a proposal to 
shave $1 trillion from defense spending worldwide over the next 10 years. Frank 
says there is no longer any reason to keep Marines in Okinawa. A spokesman for 
Speaker Pelosi, said "all spending, including the Defense Department, must be 
subject to scrutiny" but would not offer any specific backing to Frank's plan. 

6) Rainbow PUSH leader Jesse Jackson and United Auto Workers President Bob King 
announced that a march in Detroit on Aug. 28, the 47th anniversary of King's 
1963 march on Washington, will kick off a campaign to to rebuild the nation's 
cities, provide jobs and education, enact a moratorium on foreclosures, and end 
the wars in the Middle East, the Michigan Citizen reports. 

Afghanistan 
7) British Prime Minister Cameron said Britain could start withdrawing troops 
from Afghanistan as early as next year depending on conditions, the Guardian 
reports. Cameron said the British public should be clear that, by 2015, the UK 
would not have "combat troops or large numbers" in Afghanistan "because I think 
it's important to give people an end date by which we won't be continuing in 
that way." But plans to begin handing control of provinces to Afghan security 
forces by the end of this year have been quietly dropped amid fears among 
European countries that Gen. Petraeus is less committed to a speedy transfer of 
power. "Petraeus is trying to slow everything down, pushing back any 
announcement of transition until 2011," a senior European diplomat said.

Israel/Palestine 
8) An Arab man convicted in Israel of "rape by deception" because he allegedly 
pretended he was a Jew when he had consensual sex with a Jewish woman has 
called the verdict racist, the BBC reports. "If I were Jewish, they wouldn't 
have even questioned me," Sabbar Kashur told Haaretz.

Iraq 
9) Gen. Odierno says the US will need to provide financial assistance to Iraq 
for at least three more years to help build up the country's military, The Hill 
reports. But Sen. Levin has decided to slash $1 billion from the 
Administration's request, arguing it is time for Iraq to put its own money into 
the military. Sen. McCain opposes the $1 billion cut to the administration's 
request and is expected to fight it when the Senate takes up the defense bill.

Japan/Guam 
10) The White House is having trouble getting funding from Congress for a key 
component of the plan to shift thousands of Marines from Okinawa to Guam, the 
Wall Street Journal reports. In making its cuts, the Senate Appropriations 
Committee noted the recent controversy in Japan over the relocation of U.S. 
Marines on Okinawa and concluded the recent election "could further cloud the 
future of the realignment process."

Haiti 
11) The Jubilee USA Network welcomed the IMF decision to cancel Haiti's $268 
million debt to the IMF but expressed serious concern about the IMF's decision 
to provide $60 million in financing support as a new loan. "Now we must raise 
our voices again to make sure the Fund understands that a loan of any kind is 
completely inappropriate for a country in such desperate need," said the 
Executive Director of the Jubilee USA Network.

Contents:
U.S./Top News 
1) Afghan Deadline Is Cutting Two Ways
David E. Sanger, New York Times, July 21, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/22/world/asia/22assess.html

Washington - When President Obama announced a new strategy for Afghanistan in 
December, he argued that by setting a deadline of next summer to begin drawing 
down troops he would create a sense of urgency for the Afghan government to 
take the lead in the fight, while acknowledging the limits of America's 
patience with the longest war in its history.

But over the past two weeks - on Capitol Hill, in Kabul and even in 
conversations with foreign leaders - Mr. Obama has been reminded how the goal 
has become what one senior American military commander called a "double-edged 
sword," one that hangs over the White House as surely as it hangs over 
President Hamid Karzai.

The absence of serious progress this year has sown new doubts, here and abroad, 
that Mr. Obama will be able to reach even the scaled-down goals he set for 
America's mission in the time he laid out in his speech at West Point seven 
months ago. The result is that the fierce debate over whether the war is worth 
the cost - a debate that Mr. Obama did not want to join until the Taliban 
suffered some losses - is unwinding one summer earlier than he had hoped.

Mr. Obama has begun losing critical political figures and strategists who are 
increasingly vocal in arguing that the benefits of continuing on the current 
course for at least another year, and probably longer, are greatly outweighed 
by the escalating price.

For two months [longer, actually - JFP], Democrats in Congress have been 
holding up billions of dollars in additional financing for the war, longer than 
they ever delayed similar requests from President George W. Bush. Most 
Republican leaders have largely backed a continued commitment, but the White 
House was surprised the other day when one of Mr. Obama's mentors on foreign 
policy issues in the Senate, Richard G. Lugar of Indiana, argued that "the lack 
of clarity in Afghanistan does not end with the president's timetable," and 
that both the military and civilian missions were "proceeding without a clear 
definition of success."

"We could make progress for decades on security, on employment, good 
governance, women's rights," he said, without ever reaching "a satisfying 
conclusion."

The allies, voicing similar concerns, have abandoned most talk of a 
conditions-based withdrawal in favor of harder timetables. Britain's new prime 
minister, David Cameron, did his best to sound as though he and Mr. Obama were 
on the same page during his first visit to the White House on Tuesday, but he 
also told a BBC interviewer while in Washington, "We're not going to be there 
in five years' time." The Dutch leave this fall, and the Canadians say they 
intend to follow suit by the end of 2011.
[...]
All this has made it harder than ever for Mr. Obama to convince the Afghans and 
the Pakistanis that the West's commitment is enduring. "Politically, the 
support is absolutely crumbling," said David Gordon, a former top official on 
the National Intelligence Council and at the State Department who is now at the 
Eurasia Group. "You can't hide that from the players in the region, and when 
they see it, it makes them hedge even more, preparing for the post-American 
era."
[...]
But when granted anonymity, some senior White House officials who a few months 
ago said that this would be "the year of Kandahar" - referring to plans to 
retake control of the city that was the spiritual center of the Taliban - now 
acknowledge that the chances of progress there are growing more remote.

>From the start of Mr. Obama's review of the war's strategy last year, he and 
>his advisers debated the debilitating effects of what one called "the 
>weariness factor." Their calculation was that the withdrawal from Iraq, 
>combined with the 18-month limit on the troop increase established by Mr. 
>Obama, would quiet critics in his own party. That assessment proved 
>optimistic. Earlier this month, 153 Democrats, including the speaker of the 
>House, Nancy Pelosi, voted in favor of an amendment that would have required a 
>clear timetable for withdrawal. Only 98 Democrats joined Republicans in 
>defeating it.

But over the long term, what may be more damaging is the fact that members of 
the foreign policy establishment, even those who vigorously supported ousting 
the Taliban in 2001 after the 9/11 attacks, are gaining traction with arguments 
that the White House has simply failed to make the case that the rising cost is 
worth it.

"After nearly nine years of war," Richard Haass, the president of the Council 
on Foreign Relations and a senior official in Mr. Bush's State Department, 
wrote over the weekend in Newsweek, "continued or increased U.S. involvement in 
Afghanistan isn't likely to yield lasting improvements that would be 
commensurate in any way with the investment of American blood and treasure. It 
is time to scale down our ambitions there and both reduce and redirect what we 
do."
[...]

2) Jewish group petitions TIAA-CREF to divest from Israel
Jewish Telegraphic Agency, July 20, 2010
http://www.jewishjournal.com/nation/article/jewish_group_petitions_tiaa-cref_to_divest_from_israel_20100720/

A Jewish grass-roots organization is petitioning a major financial services 
provider to divest from holdings in companies it says profit from Israel's 
occupation of Gaza and the West Bank.

Jewish Voice for Peace has organized a campaign asking TIAA-CREF, one of the 
world's largest providers of financial services, to stop investing in companies 
it says "profit from the Israeli occupation of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, 
including East Jerusalem." Among the companies listed are Caterpillar, 
Motorola, Northrop Grumman, Veolia and Elbit.

The organization hopes to have 15,000 signatures on a divestment petition in 
time for TIAA-CREF's annual meeting Tuesday. As of Monday there were 12,000 
signers.

Caterpillar benefits from the demolition of Palestinian homes and Veolia 
profits from a landfill it operates in the West Bank, while Motorola, Northrop 
Grumman and Elbit all profit from security systems and military services they 
provide to Israel, according to Jewish Voice for Peace.
[...]

3) U.S. Senator Warns Aid to Haiti Is at Risk
Nicholas Casey, Wall Street Journal, July 22, 2010
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703954804575381493019428212.html

The U.S. risks wasting the aid it is offering earthquake-torn Haiti, a Senate 
report to be released Thursday says. The government has failed to make basic 
reforms such as ensuring transparent elections and reducing barriers for 
private investment, according to the report "Without Reform, No Return on 
Investment in Haiti," by Sen. Richard Lugar (R., Ind.), who criticized Haitian 
President Rene Préval's leadership during the crisis.

"President Préval's actions do not suggest a departure from the 
self-destructive political behavior that has kept Haiti the poorest nation in 
the Western Hemisphere," the report said. "If reforms ... do not occur, 
American taxpayer investments in Haiti, beyond essential humanitarian aid, 
should be reassessed."
[...]
The censure, from the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations 
Committee, marks the latest escalation between the Haitian government and its 
principal foreign benefactor.

The U.S. has promised to deliver more than $2.8 billion to Haiti, but in recent 
months concerns have grown among U.S. lawmakers that the money won't spur 
needed changes like direct foreign investment.

A main concern, according to the report, has to do with the difficulty of 
reconstructing Haiti's private sector.

Private enterprises suffered more than 70% of the Jan. 12 earthquake's total 
damage, yet the country remains one of the Caribbean's most difficult in which 
to begin a business due to government red tape, the report says. Haitian 
entrepreneurs are hobbled by lack of credit in the country, and the Haitian 
government has done little to change regulatory barriers, it says.

The report suggests the establishment of a fund administered by Haitian and 
American bankers, underwritten with a U.S. government grant, to provide loans 
for private businesses.

Mr. Préval hasn't been receptive to earlier suggestions from the Senate. After 
Sen. Lugar recommended an international team restructure Haiti's Provisional 
Electoral Council, which has been accused of being loyal to the president, Mr. 
Préval rejected the proposal, saying it would cause "anarchy."

The report warns that current efforts to rebuild Haiti could follow U.S. 
attempts to aid the country which it called unsuccessful.Since 1990, the U.S. 
has given roughly $4 billion in aid to Haiti, yet the effort has "not delivered 
many improvements," the report said.
[...]

4) U.S. to end ban on Indonesia's special forces, angering human rights groups
Craig Whitlock, Washington Post, Friday, July 23, 2010; A10 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/22/AR2010072205528.html

Jakarta - The U.S. military said Thursday that it will resume relations with 
Indonesia's special forces, an elite group blamed for atrocities and repression 
during the country's dark years of authoritarianism.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, in a visit here, said the United States will 
end its 12-year prohibition on contacts and assistance to the special forces 
after the Obama administration concluded that the unit had cleaned up its ranks 
and is committed to human rights.

"These initial steps will take place within the limits of U.S. law and do not 
signal any lessening of the importance we place on human rights and 
accountability," Gates said after meeting with Indonesian President Susilo 
Bambang Yudhoyono. "Our ability to expand upon these initial steps will depend 
on continued implementation of reforms."

Although the Pentagon has been pressing for years to resume contact with the 
Indonesian special forces, human rights groups and some U.S. lawmakers have 
resisted, arguing that the unit has stymied efforts to hold current and former 
military leaders responsible for kidnappings, assassinations and other crimes.

"This decision is a stunning betrayal of the standards the U.S. has," said 
Sophie Richardson, Asia advocacy director for Human Rights Watch. She added 
that it will "have ramifications well beyond Indonesia, in effect telegraphing 
to abusive militaries worldwide that the Obama administration's human rights 
standards are up for negotiation."

U.S. officials described the end of the ban as a key development in their 
attempt to develop closer ties with Indonesia, a country of 238 million people, 
most of them moderate Muslims, that has embraced democracy since emerging in 
1998 from decades of dictatorship.
[...]
The Indonesian special forces, known as Komando Pasukan Khusus, or Kopassus, 
have about 5,000 members but exert outsized influence on the Indonesian 
government. The president's brother-in-law is a former member, as are 
high-ranking members of the Indonesian military.

After months of negotiations with the Indonesians, U.S. defense officials said 
the White House and State Department had approved of the resumption of contacts 
with Kopassus just before Gates's arrival in Jakarta on Wednesday. The United 
States resumed regular ties with the remainder of Indonesia's military in 2005.

U.S. defense officials said Indonesia has cleansed Kopassus's ranks of people 
convicted of human rights violations and has pledged to prosecute any future 
cases in civilian courts. They also said that the special forces have 
professionalized their ranks over the past decade and that a new generation of 
officers with untainted reputations is now in charge.
[...]
Under a 1997 measure sponsored by Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), the United 
States is prohibited from having contact with foreign military units that have 
a pattern of human rights violations and have resisted efforts to hold abusers 
accountable, even for crimes committed long ago. The State Department also has 
a policy of vetting officers from foreign militaries before they are allowed to 
participate in U.S. training programs.

Kopassus served as a brutal arm of the military during long reign of Indonesian 
dictator Suharto, crushing communist sympathizers and repressing opponents in 
East Timor, Aceh and Papua. Suharto was deposed in 1998.

Indonesia has subsequently convicted about a dozen Kopassus officers for abuses 
during Suharto's rule. But advocacy groups noted that many have been allowed to 
return to duty, including some who have taken senior positions in the 
Indonesian military.

5) Overseas military spending comes under congressional scrutiny
John Vandiver, Stars and Stripes, July 21, 2010
http://www.stripes.com/news/overseas-military-spending-comes-under-congressional-scrutiny-1.111779

Stuttgart, Germany - As the Army's transformation in Europe moves forward, with 
a string of base closures planned in the year ahead, a group of lawmakers has 
launched a campaign to further cut the U.S. military presence in Europe and 
Asia.

Against the backdrop of a burgeoning national deficit and years of massive 
increases in defense spending, the restructuring plan meant to save taxpayers 
$80 billion in overseas military spending has reignited the debate in Congress 
over the future of U.S. military bases abroad.

"I do not think we should be spending money to have troops in Germany 65 years 
after World War II. We have a terrible deficit and we have to cut back," said 
Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass, who is spearheading a House effort to cut defense 
spending. "NATO was a wonderful concept. But 61 years later, I think it's time 
to say our western European allies should be on their own. We'll cooperate with 
them, but we shouldn't be subsidizing their defense."

Frank and several other lawmakers are calling for the elimination of one Air 
Force fighter wing overseas, one Army brigade combat team in Europe and two 
reinforced Marine Corps infantry battalions in Okinawa as part of a proposal to 
shave $1 trillion from defense spending worldwide over the next 10 years. The 
plan also would curtail spending on many expensive weapons systems. Frank hopes 
the recommendations will be included in next year's Deficit Reduction Plan, 
which is being drafted by an 18-member commission assembled by President Barack 
Obama and has a Dec. 1 deadline.
[...]
Drew Hammill, spokesman for House Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi, said "all 
spending, including the Defense Department, must be subject to scrutiny" but 
would not offer any specific backing to Frank's plan.

The U.S. military is shrinking its footprint in Europe by consolidating a 
number of bases into five main hubs. It recently announced the closure of 22 
Army installations between 2010 and 2015. But leaders have been resistant to 
eliminating Army brigades, saying that those forces are needed to work with 
Europe allies and deter threats.

In addition to Frank's proposal, politicians on both sides of the aisle are 
zeroing in on expenditures abroad. For instance, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, 
R-Texas, an advocate for relocating more troops stateside, says too much money 
is being spent on overseas base construction projects.

"If the United States really wants to assure our allies and deter our enemies, 
we should do it with strong military capabilities and sound policy - not by 
keeping troops stationed overseas, not siphoning funds from equipment and arms 
and putting it into duplicative military construction," Bailey said during a 
July 13 speech on the Senate floor.

To be sure, more lawmakers are questioning strategic assumptions that have long 
escaped serious challenge. At the heart of the argument over Europe is whether 
a large-scale American military presence on the continent is an outdated Cold 
War relic or a vital piece in a much larger strategic puzzle.
[...]
The Sustainable Defense Task Force, the group of defense analysts established 
by Frank, released its finding in June. The task force's report - Debts, 
Deficits and Defense: A Way Forward - contends that significant cuts can be 
made without compromising national security. Among the recommendations: cut the 
troop presence in Asia from to 65,000 from the current 76,500.

Frank says there is no longer any reason to keep Marines in Okinawa in an age 
when the central security threat facing the U.S. is terrorism, not a 
conventional war in east Asia. Moving the Marine command elements, including 
8,000 Marines and their families, from Okinawa to Guam has been in the works 
for years. The target date for the transfer is 2014.

In Europe, about 35,000 of the current level of about 75,000 would be retained 
under the task force's plan.

"The question that motivated us was, 'What is most essential for our defense?' 
Our assessment is there is no likely contingency in Europe that will ever 
require a deployment of troops the size we have there," said task force member 
Carl Conetta, co-director of the Project on Defense Alternatives. "There is 
both cost and risk, but you have to weigh it against the economic problems we 
are facing. The financial problem is a national security problem and we need to 
make sure we have capacity for the long haul."
[...]
Russia's intentions are unclear, but Europe would most likely respond in 
different ways to a reduced American presence, according to Paul Ingram, 
executive director of the British American Security Information Council, which 
examines trans-Atlantic security and arms control issues.

"Western Europeans would be quite comfortable with an American drawdown. If you 
look at the military doctrines of any western European government, they don't 
perceive any threats beyond terrorism [and] the proliferation of weapons. No 
one is concerned about invasion," said Ingram. "But it's very different in 
central and eastern Europe where a significant drawdown of conventional forces 
would be seen as problematic by them.

Despite the end of the Cold War there is still a perceived threat from Russia." 
While Europeans are divided on the Russia threat, so are American politicians.
>From Frank's perspective, the concept of reassuring allies from a Russian 
>threat is a case of "cultural lag." At this point, European countries "are big 
>enough and rich enough to reassure themselves," Frank said. "Secondly, no one 
>knows what we are reassuring them against. There is no more threat."

6) UAW, Rainbow PUSH join for 'Jobs, Justice and Peace'
National march in Detroit August 28 to kick off campaign
Diane Bukowski, Michigan Citizen, July 18, 2010
http://bit.ly/cMuZ2o

Detroit - A rising tide of hope for the future hit Detroit July 12. Rainbow 
PUSH leader Jesse Jackson and prominent union, church and community 
representatives kicked off a campaign to rebuild the nation's cities, provide 
jobs and education, enact a moratorium on foreclosures, and end the wars in the 
Middle East.

United Auto Workers President Bob King and Jackson are the key leaders of the 
Jobs, Justice and Peace campaign, which was unveiled at a press conference in 
UAW Solidarity House on E. Jefferson. They announced that a march in Detroit on 
Aug. 28, the 47th anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s 1963 march on 
Washington, D.C., will kick it off. King hosted a Freedom Walk of 125,000 in 
Detroit that June, where he first gave his historic "I Have a Dream" speech.
[...]
Speakers targeted the nation's banks, corporations and war as the culprits 
responsible for the misery of its people.

"The government bailed out the banks with our tax dollars, but the banks never 
reinvested in our country," Jackson said. "Instead, they say to urban American 
'austerity and deficit reduction,' and have foreclosed four million more homes 
this year. 

"The public sector is under attack, public education and public housing are 
being cut, but Congress just voted $6 billion more for the war in Afghanistan. 
[Actually, $33 billion is the standard number for the Afghanistan war in the 
supplemental, which is expected to come back to the House next week, as the 
Senate and House, which have both passed it, have not yet passed the same 
version - JFP]
[...]

Afghanistan 
7) UK troops could start leaving Afghanistan next year, says Cameron
Prime minister says British troops could start being withdrawn next year, but 
decision will be 'based on conditions on the ground'
Patrick Wintour, Jon Boone and Mark Tran, Guardian.co.uk, 21 July 2010
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jul/21/uk-troops-afghanistan-cameron

Britain could start withdrawing troops from Afghanistan as early as next year 
depending on conditions there, David Cameron said today following a meeting 
with Barack Obama in Washington yesterday.

The prime minister raised the prospect that a pullout of Britain's 9,500 troops 
could begin next year when asked whether the UK could emulate the US, which 
hopes to start withdrawing its forces from next July. "Yes we can, but it 
should be based on the conditions on the ground," he told BBC Radio 5 Live.

"I mean, the faster we can transition districts and provinces to Afghan 
control, clearly the faster that some forces can be brought home. I don't want 
to raise expectations about that because that transition should be based on how 
well the security situation is progressing."

Although hedging his bets about the start of a withdrawal next year, Cameron 
said the British public should be clear that, by 2015, the UK would not have 
"combat troops or large numbers" in Afghanistan "because I think it's important 
to give people an end date by which we won't be continuing in that way".
[...]
Speaking on the second day of his visit to Washington today, Cameron played 
down suggestions that he was shifting Afghan policy by stressing his remarks 
were in line with the previous Labour government policy. He said the start of a 
withdrawal next year remained a goal, rather than a firm deadline.
[...]
The desire of Obama and Cameron to start pulling out combat troops next year, 
however, could put them at loggerheads with General David Petraeus, the new US 
commander in Afghanistan.

Plans to begin handing control of provinces to Afghan security forces by the 
end of this year have been quietly dropped amid fears among European countries 
that Petraeus is less committed to a speedy transfer of power.

The change of tack, revealed in the final communique from yesterday's historic 
international conference in Kabul, reflects Petraeus's concerns that security 
conditions in Afghanistan are too weak for a transition of power to begin as 
quickly as originally planned, a Nato official told the Guardian.

Although the conference agreed that the security needs of the country will have 
to be met by the Afghan army and police by 2014, major European troop 
contributors were looking forward to more rapid progress in the relatively 
stable north and west, where Germany, Italy, Norway, Spain and other nations 
have personnel.
[...]
Beneath the diplomatic niceties, it became clear that plans first agreed by 
Nato ministers at a meeting in Estonia in April had been quietly dropped. Nato 
had hoped that, by the end of this year, a cluster of neighbouring provinces in 
the north-west of the country would have begun the handover to the Afghan army 
and police force.

But in the final agreement of the conference, a reference to transition taking 
place on a "province by province" basis, which appeared in an earlier draft, 
had been removed. A Nato official said the change reflected Petraeus's wish to 
slow the pace of the transfer of power. European powers had wanted to announce 
which provinces would be handed over at a summit of foreign ministers in Lisbon 
in November.

The official said: "For Petraeus, Lisbon is not a problem. His main concern is 
the US political timetable, and being able by next summer to show progress that 
won't unravel."

According to the official, the slowing of the timetable sparked a heated 
exchange between Petraeus and Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Nato secretary 
general, during a video conference last week.

Speaking before this week's conference, a senior European diplomat said 
Petraeus's approach was far less welcome than that of his predecessor, Stanley 
McChrystal. "Petraeus is trying to slow everything down, pushing back any 
announcement of transition until 2011," the diplomat said.
[...]

Israel/Palestine 
8) Israeli Arab who 'raped' a woman says verdict 'racist'
BBC, 21 July 2010 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-10717186

An Arab man convicted in Israel of rape because he pretended he was a Jew when 
he had consensual sex with a Jewish woman has called the verdict racist. Sabbar 
Kashur, 30, was found guilty of "rape by deception" by the Israeli court and 
sentenced to 18 months in jail.

According to the complaint filed by the woman, the two met in a Jerusalem 
street in 2008 and had sex that day. When she discovered he was not Jewish, but 
an Arab, she went to the police. Kashur was arrested and charged with rape and 
indecent assault, but the charges were later replaced by a different charge of 
"rape by deception".

But according to Kashur, he did not pretend to be Jewish. He told reporters 
that he is known by friends and family by the nickname Dudu, which is more 
commonly used by Jews called David.

He has been under house arrest for two years, he said. "If I were Jewish, they 
wouldn't have even questioned me," the Haaretz newspaper quoted him as saying. 
"That's not called rape, I didn't rape her in the forest and and throw her away 
naked. She agreed to everything that happened."
[...]
A lawyer with the Public Defenders' Office said the court had gone too far. 
"The test the court used is problematic," said Elkana Laist. "Every time a man 
tells a woman he loves her, based on which she sleeps with him, he could be 
convicted of rape."

Kashur's lawyers say he will appeal against the sentence. Around 20% of 
Israel's population are of Arab descent.

Iraq 
9) U.S. Gen. Odierno Presses Case For $2B In Funding To Rebuild Iraq
Roxana Tiron, The Hill, 07/21/10
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/110101-us-general-in-iraq-presses-case-for-2b-in-funding

The United States will need to provide financial assistance to Iraq for at 
least three more years to help build up the country's military, according to 
Gen. Ray Odierno, the top U.S. general in Iraq. "It's very important that we 
continue at some level […] to provide some support," Odierno said Wednesday at 
a breakfast with defense reporters.

Odierno's case for more U.S. funding in Iraq comes as some leading lawmakers 
are planning to significantly cut the Obama administration's request of $2 
billion for the Iraqi security forces in fiscal year 2011.

Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, 
has already decided to slash $1 billion from the request, arguing it is time 
for Iraq to put its own money into the military. 

"Some of us feel pretty strongly about this issue: That it's time - given the 
amount of money that Iraq is taking in oil revenue and the fact they cut their 
own defense budget in half in the parliament - it's kind of hard to justify 
putting billions of dollars in for the Iraq army, OK?" Levin said during a 
press briefing in June when he announced his panel's work on the 2011 defense 
authorization bill.
[...]
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), the top Republican on the armed services panel said 
the U.S. needs to stay focused and pay attention to the formation of the Iraqi 
government and continue to support the Iraqi government and military to 
"maintain their capabilities." McCain strongly opposes the $1 billion cut to 
the administration's request and is expected to fight it when the Senate takes 
up the defense bill.
[...]

Japan/Guam 
10) Obama's Okinawa Plan Hits New Snags - in D.C.
Julian E. Barnes, Wall Street Journal, July 22, 2010
http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2010/07/22/obamas-okinawa-plan-hits-new-snags-in-dc/

The Obama administration's plans to realign forces on Okinawa is running into 
new roadblocks - in Washington. In addition to political delays in Japan, the 
White House and Pentagon are now having trouble getting funding on a Capitol 
Hill for a key component of the plan, which involves shifting thousands of 
Marines from Japan's southern island to Guam.

At the beginning of the year, the Obama administration requested $452 million 
in the current budget to pay for the relocation by building new facilities in 
Guam. But the Senate Armed Services Committee and the Senate Appropriation 
committee voted to cut $320 million from that request. This week, the House 
Appropriations committee voted to cut a smaller amount, $273 million, from the 
funding for the Guam move.

In making its cuts, the Senate Appropriations Committee noted the recent 
controversy in Japan over the relocation of U.S. Marines on Okinawa and 
concluded the recent election "could further cloud the future of the 
realignment process." The Senate noted that the Okinawa government has yet to 
approve a landfill permit crucial to building a new runway at Camp Schwab. (The 
Japanese government is now waiting for the November governor's election to seek 
that crucial local approval.)

The budget cuts aren't the only signs of Washington opposition to the Marine's 
complex Okinawa plan. Veteran Democratic Rep. Barney Frank has made waves by 
calling on the Marines to pull out of Okinawa altogether.

But Congressional budgeteers say they weren't intending to signal to Tokyo that 
the U.S. was backing away from the plan to move Marines to Guam - and insisted 
the Japanese wouldn't take it that way.

"We think the government of Japan is very sophisticated and understands our 
system of government," said a Congressional staff member. "They understand that 
if we are going to do this move our goal is to make it work as smoothly as 
possible."

Congressional staff members said the problems in building new facilities for 
the Marines in Guam loomed even larger than the politics in Japan in their 
decision to cut funding.

The Senate appropriations committee said they remained concerned about Guam's 
inadequate water, electrical, road and sewer infrastructure - and said 
inadequate planning had gone in to preparing for the nonmilitary aspects of the 
move.

The House Appropriation Committee report echoed the Senate findings about Guam, 
and said it had made the cuts because of the Defense Department's "inability to 
address numerous concerns about the sustainability of the buildup as currently 
planned."

Most critically to the Guam buildup, the Environmental Protection Agency has 
called the military construction plan for Guam "environmentally 
unsatisfactory." Those concerns have caused the military to delay an 
environmental impact study that must be completed before construction is to 
begin. "If you can't get the permits you can't build," said another 
congressional staff member. "If you can't build it, you don't need the money."
[...]

Haiti 
11) IMF Takes Two Steps Forward and One Step Back on Haiti
Jubilee USA Encouraged by IMF's Debt Cancellation for Haiti, Concerned by New 
Loan
Jubilee USA Network, July 22, 2010
http://www.jubileeusa.org/press/press-item/article/imf-takes-two-steps-forward-and-one-step-back-on-haiti.html

Jubilee USA Network welcomes the International Monetary Fund Executive Board's 
decision to cancel Haiti's $268 million debt to the institution in response to 
the January 12 earthquake. Yet the IMF's decision to provide $60 million in 
financing support as a new loan raises serious concerns. 

When the IMF provided emergency assistance to Haiti as a $102 million loan 
after the earthquake, Jubilee USA and allies world-wide mobilized, calling for 
all of Haiti's debt to international financial institutions, including the 
post-quake IMF loan, to be cancelled. 

The Fund's launch of the Post-Catastrophe Debt Relief Trust Fund, through which 
Haiti's debt cancellation will be financed, represents an important step 
forward for the IMF as it initiates a concrete framework that provides debt 
cancellation and grant support to countries which face devastation beyond their 
control. 

"It is indeed a victory that the International Monetary Fund responded to calls 
from civil society and governments around the world to cancel Haiti's debts. 
Now we must raise our voices again to make sure the Fund understands that a 
loan of any kind is completely inappropriate for a country in such desperate 
need," says Eric LeCompte, Executive Director of Jubilee USA Network.
[...]

-
Robert Naiman 
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org 

Just Foreign Policy is a membership organization devoted to reforming US 
foreign policy so it reflects the values and interests of the majority of 
Americans.


 
 


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to