*No Peace for Cuba*

 *- Havana Times.org - http://www.havanatimes.org -*

Posted By *the editor* On November 17, 2010 @ 3:52 pm In *Opinion,leftcol1*|
*1 Comment <http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=33082&print=1#comments_controls>*

*By Alberto N Jones*

**
 <http://www.havanatimes.org/?attachment_id=33083> [1]

Woman Power. Photo by Ivana Beluzec

HAVANA TIMES, Nov. 17 — On April 6, 1960, Lester D. Mallory, Deputy
Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs, wrote in an
internal memorandum: “The majority of Cubans support Castro…”The only
foreseeable means of alienating internal support is through disenchantment
and disaffection based on economic dissatisfaction and hardship….every
possible means should be undertaken promptly to weaken the economic life of
Cuba.

“Mallory proposed a line of action which…makes the greatest inroads in
denying money and supplies to Cuba, to decrease monetary and real wages, to
bring about hunger, desperation and overthrow of the government”.  A
commercial, economic and financial embargo was imposed on Cuba in October
1960, which became a near total embargo on February 7, 1962, after US
citizens and corporations properties were nationalized in Cuba.

My oldest daughter Isabel Maria was born on February 27, twenty days after
this infamous law was enacted.  Seven months later, on October 22, Isabel
Maria, her mother and I were huddled in our dark home in Guantanamo, waiting
for the nuclear conflagration to begin, in the worst military crisis in our
lives.

Since, every possible reasons, real or imaginary have been invoked and
presented by all subsequent US administrations, as a justification for
keeping the embargo in place:

- Because of the loss of properties and the US refusal to accept reasonable
compensation offered by Cuba.

- Because Cuba declared itself Socialist.

- Because of the presence of nuclear missiles in Cuba

- Because Cuba was accused of “exporting” revolutions to Latin America

- Because of Cuba’s military interventions in Africa.

- Because of a lack of open, free multi-party elections and Human Rights
violations.

- Because of a lack of freedom of speech and for holding political
prisoners.

- Because Cuba is on a list of terrorist nation, etc. etc.

*An ever moving finish line*

In order to support these arguments and to continue to move the finish line,
hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent by the US State Department,
through front Foundations to create an enormous propaganda machine around
the world, geared to distort the image of Cuba and their leaders, weaken all
of its institutions through man-made, financed and directed subversive
groups, massive Radio, TV, literature and film barrage and by providing safe
haven to known terrorists on US soil.
 <http://www.havanatimes.org/?attachment_id=33084> [2]

Corner of Life. Photo Ivana Beluzec

Legally, these measures were enforced through different mechanisms such as
expelling Cuba from the OAS, opposing invitations by western Europe
governments of high ranking Cuban officials to visit their country, creation
of exclusive anti-Cuba laws such as Peter Pan, Cuban Adjustment Act, Wet
Foot/Dry Foot, the Office of Cuba Asset Control, Trading with the Enemy,
Cuban Democracy Act, Helms-Burton Act and many more.

Cuba on the other hand has responded to these attacks, by raising this issue
at every international conference, symposium, political gatherings, UN,
Caricom, SELA, ALBA and other institutions, where they have denounced the
crippling effects  this suffocating measure have had on the lives, wellbeing
and development of an entire nation.  Over time, this message has permeated
the powerful financial barrier the United States have erected around the
world, to shield this despicable act.

All institutions aforementioned  and others, have condemned this genocidal
imposition on Cuba and the United Nations General Assembly have denounced
and called for its repeal for nineteen consecutive years, which the United
States have arrogantly ignored.

Across the United States, more and more counties, cities, states,
committees, congressmen, senators, businesspeople, humanitarian groups,
religious organizations, academic, research institutions, jurists, medical
and other reputable institutions, have all decried and demanded the US
government  rescind these draconian measures and take concrete steps for
normalizing its relations with Cuba.

*The Hope Obama Kindled*

During his presidential campaign and after being elected president, Barack
Obama embodied a glimmer of hope, which led millions around the world to
believe that the fossilized, antagonistic US-Cuba relations would be
addressed differently.  Change had been the motto of his campaign.

Twenty two months after assuming the presidency, the only visible change in
the US-Cuba dispute has been restoring Cuban-Americans travel rights, as it
was during the Bill Clinton era and by allowing unlimited family visits and
cash remittances.

Notwithstanding, that the presidency of Barack Obama held the majority in
Congress and in the Senate, many of the measures he proposed, lacked his
vigorous, uncompromising defense, which led the extreme wing of the
Republican party, pundits, radio and TV personalities, to assume his
amicable, non-combative character as a sign of weakness, by openly
questioning his citizenship, accusing him of being a Muslim and declaring
war on each of his initiatives or bills presented by the Democratic Party,
slowly eroding his support base and authority.

On November 2, 2010, after governing a nation that had been turned over to
him by the worst president in recent memory, an economy on the verge of
collapse and a demoralized citizenry, Barack Obama was being blamed for
everything that was wrong by an enraged society that had been bombarded for
months with every possible degrading lies and scare tactics provided by
hundreds of millions of dollars of political campaign funds.
 <http://www.havanatimes.org/?attachment_id=33085> [3]

Cuban hug. Photo Ivana Beluzec

The loss was shattering in the US Congress, Senate, Governorship, Mayoral,
councilmen, everywhere.  At noon on November 3, a near teary eyed Barack
Obama described the electoral results as humbling, apologetic and expressing
his willingness to work closely with the incoming Republican leadership.

By surrendering and expressing regrets for doing the right thing, president
Barack Obama have sent a clear message to those of us, who had placed our
hopes and faith in him,  who trusted his administration would be different,
willing to sit down and extend a hand to those countries with whom the
United States government had a rocky relation.

For those Cubans sharing a birthday with my daughter Isabel Maria and
millions more who were born before or after her, this is a chilling
admission of continuity, that nothing will change and that the only thing
that matters to them, is the president political survival.

*Ultra-Right make big gains in Congress*

Compounding everything that was said before is the sad reality that a
handful of ultra-right-wing Cuban-Americans groups, those in the House of
Representatives and in the Senate, have successfully crafted a powerful
lobbying network that closely mimics the Israeli lobby and its impenetrable
stranglehold on every decision of the US government.

The method applied by the Cuban PAC (Political action committee) is simple
and effective. They receive millions of dollars from the US government for
the purpose of subverting and overthrowing the Cuban government.  A small
portion of that is dedicated to its original goals. The rest of whatever is
not embezzled among its leadership is widely disbursed among members of
Congress and the Senate of both parties.

By contributing, most of the time ridiculous sums of money, they are able to
buy the conscience and allegiance of these politicians, for whenever their
vote may be necessary to support or oppose anything related to Cuba.

Proof of the above, are the Torricelli Bill and the Helms Burton Act, which
was written and rammed through the US Congress and Senate by people who live
in New Jersey, North Carolina and Indiana, neither of which have anything in
common with Cuba.

Most of us remember, the terrible US-Cuba relations during the Reagan and
Clinton administrations, because of a bunch of ultra-right wing, reactionary
individuals such as Otto Reich, Roger Noriega, Negroponte, Diaz-Balart,
Ros-Lethinen, Menendez, Perez Roura and Jorge Mas Canosa, pushed back all
hopes of improved relations between both countries for decades.

Come January 2011, the prospects of US-CUBA relations are worse than ever.
In addition to rabid Marco Rubio heading to the US Senate and ferocious
David Rivera to Congress, Ileana Ros-Lethinen will become the Chair of the
all powerful House Foreign Affairs Committee, from where no bill with hints
of improving US-CUBA relations, will ever see the light of day.

Never before in the past fifty years, had the hard line, right-wing
Cuban-American political lobby been in a better position.  They are in the
driver’s seat and with full control of events.  Once again Cuban-Americans
in south Florida are beginning to pack their bags, gassing-up their yachts
and are assigning themselves positions, they intend to occupy in new the
Cuban government.

*Other influencing reasons*

Are the reasons described above, sufficient for keeping the embargo in place
for fifty years?

Can the Cuban people endure another 48 years of this wasting, eroding war of
attrition imposed upon them by the US Government, which is enforced by their
henchmen in the Cuban-American community or worse,  allow them to take over
the country?

Or could it be that the real reasons for the embargo have not been made
public?

The prevailing thought in the 19th Century was the Manifest Destiny, by
which, the Anglo-Saxon race felt they was destined to expand across the
north American continent from the Atlantic seaboard to the Pacific ocean.

President James K Polk (1795-1849) is noted for his foreign policies
successes.  He threatened war with Britain over the Pacific Northwest, then
backed-down and split the ownership with Britain.
 <http://www.havanatimes.org/?attachment_id=33092> [4]

Drive through the life. Photo: Ivana Beluzec

When Mexico rejected the American annexation of Texas, Polk led the nation
into a sweeping victory in the Mexican-American war, followed by the
purchase of California, New Mexico and Arizona.

In the summer of 1848 Polk authorized Romulus M. Saunders Ambassador to
Spain the purchase of Cuba for 100 million dollars, which in today’s money
is an equivalent of 2.5 billion dollars, which was of great interest to
southern slave owners.

The Platt Amendment of 1901, stipulated a host of conditions for the
withdrawal of US troops remaining in Cuba after the Spanish-American war of
1898:

-  Cuba would not transfer land to any power other than the US.

-  Cuba could not contract any foreign debt without guarantees that interest
payments could be met.

-  Cuba would allow US intervention in Cuban affairs when the US deemed
necessary.

-  Cuba was prevented from negotiating treaties with any country other than
the US.

-  Cuba could not allow any foreign power or powers to obtain by
colonization or for military or naval purposes, lodgment in or control over
any portion of Cuban territory.

-  Cuba was restricted in the conduct of foreign policy and commercial
relations.

-  Cuba boundaries would not include the Isles of Pines.

-  Cuba also “agreed” to sell or lease to the US, lands necessary for
coaling or naval stations at specified points to be agreed upon, leading to
the Guantanamo Bay lease.
 <http://www.havanatimes.org/?attachment_id=33087> [5]

The game is over. Photo: Ivana Beluzec

After President Teddy Roosevelt withdrew federal troops from the island in
1902, Cuba signed the Cuban-American Treaty in 1903 by President Tomas
Estrada Palma, who once favored outright annexation.

Is additional evidence needed, to establish the real motives behind this 200
years yearning of Cuba becoming another star on the United States flag?

If all Cubans, wherever they are and whatever differences they may harbor,
fail to come together at this crucial moment in history in defense of our
country and the Cuban government does not introduce new policies and
strategies, replacing those that for fifty years have been unable to
dislodge the embargo and do its outmost to fend off this life and death
threat to our sovereignty, it is a real possibility that our country’s name
will be added to those of Guam, Palmyra Atoll, Virgin Islands, Wake Island,
Midway Island, Puerto Rico and others.
------------------------------
1 Comment (Open <http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=33082&print=1#> |
Close<http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=33082&print=1#>
)

1 Comment To "No Peace for Cuba"

*#1 Comment* By *Al* On November 17, 2010 @ 10:51 pm

fantastic article- but….. The US cannot have dealings with a Communist
country such as Cuba !!
They have to spend their time offering olive branches and huge government
contracts to those symbols of democracy like China, Iraq , Saudi Arabia and
North Korea.
It’s amazing this arrogance has gone on for so many years. If the UN cannot
be more representative than this, it should be dissolved. it should never be
held ransom by one nation , no matter which side of politics it is .
------------------------------

Article printed from Havana Times.org: *http://www.havanatimes.org*

URL to article: *http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=33082*

URLs in this post:

[1] Image: *http://www.havanatimes.org/?attachment_id=33083*

[2] Image: *http://www.havanatimes.org/?attachment_id=33084*

[3] Image: *http://www.havanatimes.org/?attachment_id=33085*

[4] Image: *http://www.havanatimes.org/?attachment_id=33092*

[5] Image: *http://www.havanatimes.org/?attachment_id=33087*

-----------------

*Cubans Becoming Less Human*

Posted By *the editor* On November 17, 2010 @ 7:48 pm In *Lead
Articles,Opinion,Yusimi Rodriguez* | *1
Comment<http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=33140&print=1#comments_controls>
*

*Yusimi Rodriguez *
 <http://www.havanatimes.org/?attachment_id=33141> [1]

Relaxing. Photo by Matthew Siffert

HAVANA TIMES, Nov. 17. – We don’t have yellow journalism in Cuba; and we
don’t we need it.  Every day we hear the sensationalized details concerning
some armed robbery or a rape.  These days people are talking about a daring
bus holdup.

Some will say it happened on the P-15 bus, while others will insist that it
occurred on the P-3 or the P-1. The rumor mill fills the hole left by the
official press, which reports absolutely nothing in this respect.

Accuracy cannot be expected.  But what’s certain is that as we approach the
end of the year holidays, there’s always an increase in crime, and the
recent announcement about mass layoffs across the country has contributed to
worsening the situation.

It’s becoming frequent that whenever a group of people get together to
socialize and chat, someone will immediately start telling a story
concerning a violent crime that they witnessed or heard about.  And since no
one likes to be outdone, someone else will then follow that up with their
own story.

Everybody seems to have one, and so do I. Mine is not as spectacular as an
armed bus assault or a Hollywood-style robbery of a currency exchange store
in broad daylight.  My story is a simple unarmed assault of a woman to
snatch her gold chain.

What was interesting is that this incident didn’t occur in the dark pre-dawn
hours along some deserted street, but around 9:00 in the evening.  What’s
more, it was at a fairly crowded bus stop located in front of a 24-hour
bakery in which all the workers are men (or at least 99 percent of them).
 <http://www.havanatimes.org/?attachment_id=33142> [2]

Thinking About Making Lunch. Photo by Nina Hooker

Out of all the people waiting at the stop, no one intervened.  The bakery
workers sprang into action, but it was to lock all the doors and windows of
their place. Everyone watched the woman struggling with the man as she as
she got slapped around and punched, and finally lost her chain.

In fact, this assailant could be described as considerate; he could have
raped and even killed her without anyone coming to her aid.

I know people who have traveled to other countries to study or to live
outside of Cuba for good.  They always make comments like: “People won’t
help you there, even if you’re dying,” or “if you faint in the street, no
one comes up to up to see what’s wrong,” and “people don’t look at each
other in the eyes,” “no one will offer their seat to an elderly person,” “if
you’re getting your butt beat up in the street, people will simply lock
their doors.”

Once abroad, people miss the human solidarity characteristic of Cuba.  But
is seems that soon there won’t be anything to miss.

This is the country where the neighborhood Committees for the Defense of the
Revolution (CDR) were created; a nation where people united to reject
verbally (and with blows) the enemies of the Revolution (meaning those
people who left the country at the beginning of the Revolution and in the
1980s).  This is a land where many were willing to give their lives
completing internationalist missions.

Yet those same citizens doing night-watch duty today as *cederistas* (CDR
members) on their blocks, can stand motionless before any attack on a
defenseless human being.  And they’re within their rights.

No one will put them in jail for not helping a person in difficulties.  When
any background check is carried through a CDR on some citizen, they won’t
ask the president of that chapter if the individual is capable of
intervening when someone is assaulting a woman.

What they have in mind is whether that individual is an active member of the
Committee, if they participate in voluntary work days and if they do CDR
night-watch duty. People don’t want problems.  No one is willing to risk
being killed or hurt for a woman stupid enough to go around with an
attractive necklace.

People always point the finger saying things like “who told her to put that
jewelry on,” or “who told her to be walking around so late at night” and
“who had her to go out with so much money.”
 <http://www.havanatimes.org/?attachment_id=33143> [3]

Havana kids. Photo: Noelia González Casiano

It’s the same old story of the blame ending up being placed on the victim.
Others say that the police are the ones who should take care of such
problems, since that’s what they’re paid to do.  And they are right.  But is
the value of a human life then equal to a police officer’s wage?

As I’ve said before, I’m not brave; however, I don’t know if I could sleep
after having seen a man assault a woman and myself not having at least tried
to throw a rock at him.

Could it be that due to the differences generated by the dual currency and
unequal access to new luxuries (like cellphones, video games and entry into
hotels), combined with the uncertainty of the country’s future,  we are
acquiring the traits of savage individualism?

The streets are dangerous and it scares me.  But those who scare me the most
aren’t the ones who commit the crimes, but those who simply watch.  What’s
next?  Laughing about what’s happening?  Participating?  We’ve climbed into
the driver’s seat of “save yourself if you can.”

Very soon, instead of chanting like the Young Pioneers affirming “We will we
like Che,” we will begin shouting: “We are becoming less human.” ****
------------------------------

1 Comment (Open <http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=33140&print=1#> |
Close<http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=33140&print=1#>
)

1 Comment To "Cubans Becoming Less Human"

*#1 Comment* By *Al* On November 17, 2010 @ 11:23 pm

I hate to hear stories such as this.
I have vacationed in Cuba since 1984 , and have seen many changes , most of
which have been positive.
I hope that the troubles and stresses that are causing some of these
negative social events will ease and life becomes better for all –
brotherhood and socialism- it should be hard to separate the two.
------------------------------

Article printed from Havana Times.org: *http://www.havanatimes.org*

URL to article: *http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=33140*

URLs in this post:

[1] Image: *http://www.havanatimes.org/?attachment_id=33141*

[2] Image: *http://www.havanatimes.org/?attachment_id=33142*

[3] Image: *http://www.havanatimes.org/?attachment_id=33143*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to