http://www.marxist.com/venezuela-interview-maria-leon.htm


 Venezuela: Interview with María León, newly elected MP for the PSUV in
Aragua <http://www.marxist.com/venezuela-interview-maria-leon.htm>
Written by Lucha de Clases Wednesday, 17 November 2010
[image: Print]<http://www.marxist.com/venezuela-interview-maria-leon/print.htm#>

*"If there weren’t so many bureaucratic hands in the State apparatus,
stopping resources from reaching the people, we would have overcome extreme
poverty." The newly elected MP of the PSUV in Aragua and ex-Minister for
Women and Gender Equality, Maria León spoke with Lucha de Clases to draw up
a critical balance-sheet of the September 26 elections, the sabotage of the
Venezuelan oligarchy and the need for international solidarity with the
Bolivarian Revolution.*

*LC: What is your analysis of the September 26 election results?*

* <http://www.marxist.com/images/stories/venezuela/Maria_Leon_at_Gotcha.jpg>
*
[image: Maria Leon at Gotcha]
ML: As a Venezuelan who has dedicated all of her political activity in
favour of the social interests of working men and women, and for the
struggle for socialism, I look at every political event from a class point
of view.

In Venezuela we have the phenomenon that Marx and Engels refer to in *The
Communist Manifesto*, which states: “Our epoch, the epoch of the
bourgeoisie, possesses, however, this distinct feature: it has simplified
class antagonisms. Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two
great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other —
Bourgeoisie and Proletariat.”

For me what is happening today in Venezuela and much of our America which is
in struggle, involves not only the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, but also
the oligarchy and the working people. I say "working people" because some
oligarchs, by the fact that they were born in Venezuela believe that they
are part of the people and thus I use the term “working people” to avoid
confusion.

What is happening? This country since the popular uprising against the
oligarchy at the time of Zamora had not risen again. All the wars that have
taken place since then to this day, have been carried out by different
groups of the left, of the right, of people ambitious for power and glory,
and some seeking justice, but none of these had involved the whole people as
we have achieved since the beginning of the Bolivarian Revolution with
comandante Hugo Chavez.

As each day passes the two major camps, that of the oligarchy and that of
the people will become more clearly defined. The elections are a
demonstration of this confrontation and a huge one at that, because so far,
both the working class and the oligarchy were disguised and speaking of
National Unity, the interests of the Nation...

For example, we were always told that in the Orinoco Belt there was bitumen
and everyone had thought that they, for the national good, would deliver
this bitumen which the multinationals found so difficult to process. We
believed in this nonsense during the period of government of the oligarchy
under the Acción Democrática and COPEI [Social Christian Party of
Venezuela].

The oligarchy has now been unmasked. The people know who the oligarchy are
and what interests they represent and it is equally clear who the working
people are and the historical interests that we are defending. The elections
are a demonstration of this.

What is the oligarchy doing? In the first place, we have not been able to
take the state apparatus out of the hands of the oligarchy, because within
the state apparatus, the revolutionaries hardly occupy any positions. Most
of the Venezuelan state apparatus is still in their hands.

They are involved in the same old fraud, stealing as they have done
throughout history, allowing arms trafficking, drugs trafficking to destroy
the young workers, and the youth in the villages and when they fail to turn
them into thugs to put them in prisons built for them, they send them to
kill as we see happening daily. I accuse the oligarchy. Young people who die
here are ordered to kill by the oligarchy.

Sure, the latter takes advantage of the problem of insecurity, as was always
the case with slave owners, feudal lords, capitalists and oligarchs and this
should frankly be called Terror. They are introducing drugs, prostitution,
and all this poison. Polar [a big brewery and food company in Venezuela]
gets our youth and our men drunk every week, only to kill them later on.
When they introduce panic and terror, some of our forces that are not fully
conscious of the class position they occupy in society become frightened and
abstain.

It is clear that between the previous election and the September election
more than a million of our supporters decided to abstain, on top of the
general level of abstention. Where did these people go? The propaganda of
the oligarchy about property and terror, saying that the government is doing
nothing to resolve the question of lack of security, that the government is
going to take your house away, the same house that Chavez himself gave you,
but that he is going to take it away because it will be expropriated... All
this led some of our people to abstain from voting.

Furthermore, it is clear that a lot of them [the bourgeoisie] are still in
the state apparatus, because we have not kicked them out... And this after
11 years!? We see the same faces, the same people. They were not present in
the previous parliament because they decided to boycott the previous [2005]
elections, you'll find them in the executive, in the electoral commission,
you'll find them in all the corridors of power, in the ministries, in the
mayors’ and governors’ offices. They are positioned there, preventing the
people from achieving what they want and hindering the work of government.

Of course when they block our running of things, the result is that the
people see that even when Chavez orders measures to be taken, these are not
applied because there is a mass of saboteurs within the state machinery.
That's why our running of things has so many failings.

I am of the opinion that if there were not so many individuals belonging to
the AD, COPEI and their offshoots, with their fingers in the State pie,
stopping resources from reaching the people, we would have eliminated
extreme poverty by now. We have reduced it but we could not removed it
altogether because in the course of things we have people stealing and the
state apparatus is full of such people. This is what is exacerbating the
sense of insecurity, this is what is damaging services, the road network;
everything is getting worse because it is not possible to really implement
the Simón Bolívar Plan [the government's general development programme]. The
obstacles to carry out our policies, imposed by the State, which is still in
the hands of AD, COPEI and their offshoots, in my opinion are one of the
major causes of discontent and fear.

The other problem with the elections is that up until now we have educated
both revolutionaries and non-revolutionaries in the idea that the main task
of politicians is the struggle for power. Where does the problem lie? In the
fact that it is presented as a struggle for the sake of power for oneself,
and what is not explained is that when a politician is being formed, it is a
struggle for power for the people.

Thus, anyone who aspires to a position of power does so not for the people,
not as spokespersons of the people, but simply for oneself.

I create my group, you create yours, and then it becomes a struggle to the
death amongst ourselves that loses sight of the main objectives: confronting
the enemy, strengthening class consciousness, awareness of the fatherland...
and thus it becomes a power-struggle between small cliques. This is one of
the most terrible problems that we face. We have become politicised but we
have to understand that politics must represent the interests of social
classes. For the oligarchy that is very clear and they work for their
interests. Among our own working people there is also awareness of this, but
in our midst we also have groups that divide the movement because they
follow this or that individual, or one or other of the factions fighting
each other and in the meanwhile the enemy encourages all these
contradictions. The oligarchy manoeuvres within our own forces to foment
disunity and we end up ignoring the gravity of the situation, not seeing the
wood for the trees.

In the concrete case of Caracas, why did we lose an MP by a small number of
votes (300 or 400) and instead the People's Electoral Movement, that stood
independently, won 6,000 votes? What happened? Why did these votes not go to
Tania Díaz, the PSUV candidate? We are failing in something, but why?
Because the enemy is united by a single interest: their hatred towards
Chavez.

On the other hand the only thing that unites us is love, but we also need to
develop hatred, hatred of the oligarchy, because so long as we pay homage to
Mr. Oligarch, we will not be able to define the two opposing camps that are
the oligarchy on one side and the people on the other. I suggest that we
stop saying love, love, love ... But replace it with “love for the people,
and hatred of the oligarchy!” As Alí Primera said, "When there are no longer
the oppressed, then I will sing about peace." Therefore, I love all human
beings, but we must hate the oligarchy and we must not give them a single
vote, we must sow love, but also class hatred.

Of course we won! That's not up for discussion; we have a majority in the
Assembly, but we could have won 110 MPs, which is what we were aiming for.
Why did we fail to achieve this? Because the national and international
oligarchy has a worked out strategy and we on the other hand did not know
how to, and were not able to, create among our people a class based
rejection, such that no worker would watch Globovisión or any other TV
channel of the oligarchy. They will never get into my house. If they come to
my house, they will have to with weapons in hand to take me prisoner, but I
will never turn on a TV channel to hear an oligarch speak.

The oligarchy hates the people. They kill us, they prostitute us, they
starve us off, and they alienate us. Food disappears and we, on the other
hand, are sending them love messages. It is like the slaves should be
sending messages of love to the slave-owners. The only thing that the slave
could do was to hate his slave-owner, and my appeal is therefore this: We
have had enough of “love” and if they hate the people, we hate the
oligarchy.

*LC: In your speech you talk about **the working people, the working class.
Do you think that the speeches and policies of some officials, aimed at
those business people who call themselves socialists, but who exploit their
workers, humiliate and mistreat them, are being successful or have they
added elements of confusion and malaise among the workers?*

ML: I think so. They are like chameleons, they change. They are
entrepreneurs of the AD and COPEI and of all kinds of parties. They have
white legs, green bellies and wear red berets; in other words a monster. For
me that is how I see them: white legs, green bellies and red beret. They are
types that appear in all movements.

If you read the history of the struggles of our indigenous people you'll
find, as always, there were many that sold out to the oppressor, but to an
oppressor that manipulates them as in our case. Here we have some
businessmen who are manipulators, who pretend to be at the service of the
government... But others think differently, we have to be analytical. In the
category of working people, there is room for honest, private producers that
do exist.

The latter know what their fate is: not that of accumulating money and
becoming a monopoly, but rather that businesses in the end should all be in
the hands of the people and workers. They will go forward, but together with
the workers. But towards those who seek to make a lot of money and create
monopolies, we have to apply the idea of hatred of the oligarchy. This is
not about a law to control them, no; it is a matter of hate towards the
oligarchy...

Why does our President call this the “Campaña Admirable” [admirable
campaign], 200 years after the death of the Liberator? What did Bolívar say
in this campaign? "Spanish and Canarians rest assured of your death even if
you are indifferent. Americans can count on your lives even if you are
guilty."

It was not about whether you are black, or whether you are white, none of
that. If you are with this process of emancipation you will have life with
all the flaws you may possess. If you are with the colonisers, you are going
to die. He made a declaration of war to the death. Of course, taking into
account the conditions of today, I am not saying that the oligarchs should
die. But their power to exploit must be brought to an end; their ability to
exploit and enslave us must die. And to those who live we say welcome,
welcome to life in the workers’ society.

We do not hate them as people; we hate them as a class. As people have the
same sense of humanity towards them as we do with all the others, but as a
class they should disappear and the time for this has come here in Venezuela
with the Bolivarian Revolution, where the beginning of the end has come for
them. They will perish as Venezuelan oligarchs, as Latin American oligarchs,
as global oligarchs.

*LC: The Hands Off Venezuela and the Boliva**rian Congress of Peoples
organised solidarity activities in 61 countries, with the aim of countering
the negative propaganda of the world press in the run-up to the elections of
26 September. What message would you give to all those comrades who read
this interview?*

ML: First of all, I would like to send you my personal thanks as a
revolutionary and a Venezuelan. To me, this class divide that exists in
Venezuela is the same as in the rest of the world and there is no other
solution for the exploited of the world, than the one expressed by Marx:
Workers of all countries unite! Working men and women of the world, unite!
The struggle in Pakistan, Palestine, the struggle of any people, of Peru or
Bolivia ... it is the same fight.

Humanity currently has two options before it: to continue the path to
destruction through capitalism or march united towards socialism to save
humanity. Here there is no middle ground; the scientists say so, and we see
it every day with the natural disasters in the world.

*Today the words of Marx are more relevant than ever before and this
campaign that you, the International Marxist Tendency with Alan Woods, and
all the other fighters like yourselves and other Venezuelan fighters, have
organised, these acts of solidarity are with us and with yourselves, because
what we are doing is defending the world, we are not advocating any selfish
interest.*

The revolution means happiness for all humanity. We all know that no people
can liberate itself on its own. The only way to freedom and justice is with
the unity of those who love, who fight against discrimination and betrayal,
against everything that is harmful to humanity. So, I urge you to extend
this solidarity, this Hands off Venezuela, so that we can hear these words
in all countries.

I remember that once we set up the Hands Off Vietnam campaign. That is to
say, “bloodstained hands of imperialism out of our countries”, because we
want to be free. You can count on my support, my gratitude, my admiration
and awareness that without international support no people can ever be
completely free. Only be being united can we be free. Thank you for these
days of solidarity; continue to organise them and extend them, in the
awareness that when we fight for others we are fighting for ourselves, and
for our sons and daughters.

Source: *Lucha de
Clases*<http://www.marxist.com/weblinks/americas/lucha-de-clases-venezuela.htm>(Venezuela)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to