Indiana Plans To Lie To Women Seeking Abortionsposted by: Robin Marty 

When it comes to abortion, legislators seem to believe it is the one  
medical procedure where their personal opinion matters more than the  
decisions that a woman and her doctor think is best for her situation.  
 
 Now, in Indiana, politicians believe they should get to legislate to have 
doctors lie to women, too.
 
 Via Huffington Post:
 

[O]ne of the most controversial portions 
of the [Indian abortion] bill is the part that  would require doctors to
 inform women about the risks of abortion,  including "the possibility 
of increased risk of breast cancer following  an induced abortion and 
the natural protective effect of a completed  pregnancy in avoiding 
breast cancer."
Indiana wouldn't be the first state to promote this theory. According to the 
Guttmacher Institute, five states
 -- Alaska, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Texas and West Virginia -- currently 
 include mentions of a link between abortion and breast cancer in 
written  counseling materials.
In 1999, Nevada Republican Sharron Angle 
-- who was then in the state  Assembly and recently lost the U.S. Senate
 race against Harry Reid -- proposed a similar measure requiring doctors to 
make the abortion-breast cancer link.
The American Cancer Society (ACS) and other major health organizations, 
however, have rejected this theory.
  In February 2003, the U.S. National Cancer Institute brought together 
 "more than 100 of the world's leading experts who study pregnancy and  
breast cancer risk." They found that neither induced nor spontaneous  
abortions lead to an increase in breast cancer risk. In fact, the risk  
is actually increased for a short period after a woman carries a  
pregnancy to full term (i.e., gives birth to a child). According to ACS,
  these findings were considered "well established," which is the 
highest  level for scientific evidence.
In June 2009, the highly respected 
American College of Obstetricians  and Gynecologists Committee on 
Gynecologic Practice wrote, "Early  studies of the relationship between 
prior induced abortion and breast  cancer risk were methodologically 
flawed. More rigorous recent studies demonstrate no causal relationship between 
induced abortion and a subsequent increase in breast cancer risk."
Minnesota also has the erroneous "abortion may cause breast cancer"  
claim in their list of information that a woman is forced to read before
  her abortion, passed in the "Women's Right to Know Act." 
  Although the information has been amended to read that they no longer 
 believe that the studies are true, the section still begins by stating 
 "Findings from earlier studies suggested there was an increased risk of
  breast cancer among women who had an abortion," and that
 "Women 
who have a strong family history of cancer or who have clinical  findings
 of breast disease should seek medical advice from a physician  
regardless of their decision to become pregnant or have an abortion." 
 

 Legislators are passing laws commanding doctors to lie to their  
patients.  If this were for any medical reason besides abortion, people 
 would be pushing to have them removed from office.  But since it's  
simply a woman's right to decide when to have a child at stake, everyone
  lets it pass.

http://www.care2.com/causes/womens-rights/blog/indiana-plans-to-lie-to-women-seeking-abortions/#comment-1783960



      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to