*CONDITIONS WORSEN IN JAPAN

*
**

*"Dangerous levels of radiation have leaked into the atmosphere 
following a fire and explosions at a nuclear plant in northeastern 
Japan, officials warned on Tuesday as the country reels in the wake of 
last week's devastating earthquake and tsunami," begins a piece at /al 
Jazeera/ 
<http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/2011/03/201131584630423499.html>
 
this morning. *

*"The evacuation order at the Fukushima nuclear power plant came as a 
tall white cloud was seen billowing high into the sky over the stricken 
complex," reports French news 
<http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110316/wl_asia_afp/japanquake_20110316074500>.*

*Even as conditions worsen in Japan, corporate media try to keep as much 
pro-nuke spin on things as they can get away with. /NBC News/ last night 
did a piece on Californians buying up iodine pills to prepare for 
radiation coming their way, as though these people are crazy.  But most 
Americans now have little trust in our mass media and government, which 
is the fault of media companies like /NBC/ for their long history of 
putting corporate profits before human health in their reporting (NBC is 
owned by GE, a major designer of existing nuclear power plants-- once 
the leading company in making nuclear weapons systems as well).
*

*Although life-threatening levels of radiation are loose in parts of 
Japan and are unlikely to spread to the US (we will get higher than 
normal radiation from it), we don't think it's crazy for people to keep 
iodine pills in their medicine cabinet for emergencies.  We have a lot 
of nuke plants in the Land of the Free, and some of them are the same 
design as the Japanese plants, and irresponsibly built on earthquake 
fault lines 
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/22/us-fault-lines-graphic-ea_n_432948.html>.*

*There are 104 nuclear reactors across the U.S. -- 35 of which are 
boiling-water reactors <http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=54852> of 
a similar design to the troubled models in Japan. *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*FOG RULES ABSOLUTELY


*
**
*American confidence in the US government is at a 35 year low, according 
to a poll just out 
<http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/03/15/poll-support-for-afghan-war-hits-record-low/>.
 


The poll also reveals that a record 64% do not support the war in 
Afghanistan.  The deceptive corporate media still have convinced 31% to 
back the war which so enriches our ruling Forces of Greed (FOG).

The FOG learned long ago that they don't need a majority to rule, just 
have to discourage public interest political parties and candidates from 
running for office by giving them no mass media coverage and not 
allowing them into candidate debates.  They've also been successful in 
discouraging most citizens from even showing up at the polls to vote, by 
giving the "evil" and "lesser evil" options without a "good" choice.
*
**
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK


*
**

*"At least 200 people were shot and wounded on Tuesday in a Shiite 
village south of the Bahraini capital, a medic said, and two people 
killed elsewhere, as the king imposed a state of emergency after 
bringing in foreign troops to help quell anti-regime protests," begins a 
piece in French news 
<http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110315/wl_mideast_afp/bahrainpoliticsunrestgulf_10;_ylt=AqKJbOs7Gtahms0OTzT5oWSFOrgF;_ylu=X3oDMTMwa3Nya2oxBGFzc2V0A2FmcC8yMDExMDMxNS9iYWhyYWlucG9saXRpY3N1bnJlc3RndWxmBHBvcwM0BHNlYwN5bl9wYWdpbmF0ZV9zdW1tYXJ5X2xpc3QEc2xrA2h1bmRyZWRzc2hvdA-->
 
this morning.
*

*Saudi King Abdullah appears to be saying, by sending troops to Bahrain, 
"Enough of this democracy crap."  Do not expect our government to 
interfere in any meaningful way, as long as Abdullah controls the tap to 
all that light, sweet crude.  Here's Hillary's statement (short video 
<http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/03/201131643831976772.html>),
 
note her tone compared to what she says when protests happen in Iran, 
Saudi Arabia's long time foe.
*

*Abdullah was upset at what happened in Egypt and other Arab nations, 
but is probably somewhat satisfied that the generals who now run Egypt 
were trained in the USA and are obedient as they crack down on protests, 
as the Empire regains control, inch by inch.
*

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Kevin Zeese, one of our /LUV/ members, gave a wonderful speech he wrote 
in support of Bradley Manning here: http://www.vimeo.com/21031738  
(video about 20 minutes long).

I remember worrying when Manning was first thrown into the Marine jail, 
that he would be lost, people would forget about him, and what he did 
would all be for nothing, as corporate media erased it all (as an old 
man, combat vet and peace activist, I've seen this happen over and over 
again, it is standard operating procedure for the Empire, inside the 
military, Congress, White House, and mass media).

You can help this heroic kid by going to the Bradley Manning Support 
Network http://www.bradleymanning.org/
Where you may donate, and if you don't have money to give there are 
other actions there.  I'm so glad many are thinking, "we can't let this 
kid vanish in a hole," and he won't if we all stick to exposing what's 
happening to as many as we can reach.

Our National Security State 
<http://members.cox.net/libertyuv/NatSec.htm> would send Bradley to 
Gitmo if they thought they could get away with it.  It is my belief his 
torture will be limited as long as we keep a spotlight on him-- they 
will be afraid to go too far with punishment.

But they have already descended to torturing him.  Lisa Hajjar takes it 
further in this following /al Jazeera/ piece.  The international media 
is on it, even if our own cowardly corporate media executives work their 
standard cover up routine, as the most important branch of the National 
Security State <http://members.cox.net/libertyuv/NatSec.htm> --Jack***

**

** *PRIVATE MANNING PROVES 'SLIPPERY SLOPE' * 
<http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/03/2011310153040668605.html>*



by Lisa Hajjar*

*Bradley Manning, the Army intelligence analyst accused of leaking a 
massive trove of classified material to WikiLeaks, has been imprisoned 
since May 2010. The treatment to which he has been subjected, including 
protracted isolation, systematic humiliations and routinised sleep 
deprivation, got more extreme last week when the commander of the brig 
at Quantico, Virginia, imposed on him a regime of forced nakedness at 
night and during an inspection of his cell every morning until his 
clothing is returned.*

*These types of abusive tactics were authorised by the Bush 
administration for use on foreign detainees captured in the war on 
terror, on the theory that causing "debilitation, disorientation and 
dread" would produce "learned helplessness" and make them more 
susceptible and responsive to interrogators' questioning.*

*Reports about Manning's treatment indicate that the Pentagon has 
continued to utilise reverse-engineered SERE (survival, evasion, 
resistance, extraction) techniques that were developed during the Cold 
War to train US soldiers in case they were captured and tortured by 
regimes that do not adhere to the Geneva Conventions.*

*The use of such methods in 2011 signals that the American torture 
playbook hasn't been retired; it's gone into a new printing. In the 
years between 9/11 and mid-2004, the actual policy of torture was still 
largely secret. Before the lid was peeled back by the Abu Ghraib photos 
and the first batch of "torture memos", the touchstone of the public 
debate was the hypothetical ticking bomb scenario.*

*Torture advocates opined that the use of non-maiming techniques (i.e., 
"torture lite") is a lesser evil, and might be legitimately employed by 
American interrogators to break a recalcitrant terrorist suspected of 
possessing valuable intelligence (e.g. the whereabouts of that ticking 
bomb) in order to keep Americans safe. In those years, torture advocates 
never envisioned the use of such tactics on a US soldier, for if they 
had, their claims would not have gotten such traction in the mainstream 
media (or been fetishised in the Jack Bauer character of the popular 
television program /24/).*

**Domestic torture**

*Yet, today here we are, subjecting an American soldier to some of the 
techniques that were cleared for use by the CIA on Abu Zubaydah in 2002. 
The panoply of tactics applied to Abu Zubaydah includes many that 
Manning has been spared, such as waterboarding and the confinement box.

This development was hardly unforeseeable. Opponents of torture had 
staked their positions in the early debate with warnings not only that 
torture is illegal and ineffective, but also with historic evidence that 
states which authorise the torture of enemies embark down a slippery slope.*

*In the Bush administration's inner circle, officials who opposed the 
authorisation and use of interrogational abuse as illegal and 
counterproductive to national security were excluded from 
decision-making. Interrogation policy was guided and gassed by the 
presumptions that violence and degradation would work to elicit true 
information, a claim that in the American case has been proven patently 
false - but still gets trumpeted as true by those who resist being 
encumbered by facts and evidence.*

*Presumptions of efficacy and rightlessness had the predictable effect 
of expanding the universe of those deemed to be torturable in the quest 
for actionable intelligence. Over the last decade, thousands of foreign 
prisoners taken into US custody in Afghanistan, Guantanamo and Iraq were 
subjected to systematic and wanton abuses, the vast majority of whom 
were either entirely innocent (arrested by mistake, rounded up in sweeps 
through villages or sold for bounty) or who had no meaningful intelligence.*

*This universe continues to expand because there has been no serious and 
sustained effort to confront the abject failures and high costs of the 
torture policy. Rather, the false presumptions of efficacy and 
rightlessness continue to be persuasive to those who make or endorse US 
interrogation policy.*

**Defining the slippery slope**

*The subjection of Manning to tactics originally authorised for foreign 
terror suspects proves that torture opponents were correct about the 
slippery slope, as they were about everything else. Putting Manning 
through the "learned helplessness" regimen makes president Barack 
Obama's day-one promise to "end torture" and "restore the rule of law" 
even more of a mockery than the "looking forward, not backward" 
commitment to unaccountability for crimes perpetrated by officials of 
the previous administration. The torturous treatment of soldier/citizen 
Manning is even occurring on the Nobel Peace Prize-winning 
no-to-torture-president's watch.

But in Manning's case, the rationale that undergirded the authorisation 
of interrogational abuse - the legitimate need for actionable 
intelligence to keep Americans safe - is entirely missing.*

*Manning has already been charged and faces court martial for providing 
classified information to a legally undefined enemy - a conundrum that 
will pickle the process of his prosecution.*

*The classified information that Manning gathered and leaked because he 
felt that the public had a right to know includes: over 260,000 
diplomatic cables, including ones revealing the lengths to which the US 
went in trying to thwart torture investigations in allied countries; 
tens of thousands of intelligence reports about the wars in Afghanistan 
and Iraq, some of which contradict the public discourse about what US 
forces are doing in those countries; and two videos that expose military 
targeting of unarmed civilians.*

*The actual act of leaking has already happened and is over. Manning has 
been charged. Why, then, is his abuse continuing and intensifying?*

*There is a slippery slope answer to this, too. States that utilise 
torture inevitably expand the reasons to justify its use. Manning is 
being abusively instrumentalised for the goal of trying to implicate 
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange as an active procurer of the leak in 
order to seek Assange's extradition to the US.*

*No evidence has come to light that WikiLeaks or Assange influenced or 
aided Manning to leak before the fact. But the political beast wants to 
feast on Assange's head, and so Manning's interrogational abuse continues.
*

*http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/03/2011310153040668605.html
*

**/Lisa Hajjar teaches sociology at the University of California - Santa 
Barbara and is a co-editor of Jadaliyya./**

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*If you wish to be removed from this list, please let us know*
**
*To join the Liberty Underground news service email 
[email protected] "join" for a subject*
**
*You may also join our talk group 
athttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertyundergroundtalk/ 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertyundergroundtalk/>if you would like 
to participate*
**
*email: [email protected]*
**
*Tell your friends about /LUV News/ because some people just don't get it*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to