http://cubamoneyproject.org/?p=1427

 <http://cubamoneyproject.org/?p=1427>
U.S. companies in Cuba tied to top-secret
work<http://cubamoneyproject.org/?p=1427>

Filed under News <http://cubamoneyproject.org/?category_name=news> {no
comments <http://cubamoneyproject.org/?p=1427#commentlist>}

At least 37 U.S. companies that worked in Cuba from 2000 to 2009 are
involved in top-secret taxpayer-financed endeavors somewhere in the world,
Washington Post and FedSpending <http://www.fedspending.org/> records show.


In July 2010, the Washington Post identified 1,931 companies that do
top-secret work on behalf of the U.S. government (See the Post’s Top Secret
America <http://projects.washingtonpost.com/top-secret-america/> database).
FedSpending records show that at least 37 of those firms also have been
contracted for jobs – though not necessarily secret work – in Cuba.


Records do not show precisely where all of the classified work was carried
out, but it appears that most or all took place as part of
multimillion-dollar upgrades to the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, or GITMO,
after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

In June 2010, the Post
reported<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/06/AR2010060604093.html>that
U.S. officials had spent at least $500 million to transform “what was
once a sun-beaten and forgotten Caribbean base into one of the most secure
military and prison installations in the world.”


The Post said spending included:

   - $249,000 for “an abandoned volleyball court”
   - $296,000 for “an unused go-kart track” and
   - $3.5 million for “27 playgrounds that are often vacant.”

The total spent at Guantanamo could be nearly $2 billion, the Post reported.
The Cuba Money Project reported on March 14 that U.S. companies had
gotten nearly
$1 billion <http://cubamoneyproject.org/?p=960> in U.S. contracts for work
in Cuba and detailed some of the costs.

The 37 companies involved in both Cuba and top-secret work somewhere in the
world include some familiar and not-so-familiar names:

   1. CH2M Hill Companies
   2. CACI International Inc.
   3. Torres Advanced Enterprise Solutions Incorporated
   4. Carahsoft Technology Corp.
   5. Endeca Technologies Incorporated
   6. Lockheed Martin Corp.
   7. Dell Computer Corporation
   8. dck Worldwide LLC
   9. Xerox Corp.
   10. Apptis
   11. URS Corp.
   12. IBM Corp.
   13. Motorola, Inc.
   14. Symantec Corporation
   15. Integrated Security Technologies
   16. BAE Systems, Inc.
   17. GTSI
   18. immixGroup
   19. Transperfect
   20. CALNET, Inc.
   21. General Dynamics
   22. Trusted Computer Solutions
   23. L-3 Communications
   24. Global Technology Resources Inc.
   25. Blue Tech
   26. Microsoft Corporation
   27. Siemens
   28. Quantum
   29. Zel Technologies LL
   30. Harris Corporation
   31. Verizon
   32. AINS, Inc.
   33. Dataline Inc.
   34. QinetiQ
   35. Parsons Corporation
   36. Aecom
   37. Thales

Dana Priest and William M. Arkin led the team that carried out the Post’s
two-year investigation. They said U.S. government agencies and private
contractors doing top-secret work amounted to a “fourth-branch of
government” that operated with little oversight. They wrote:

The top-secret world the government created in response to the terrorist
attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, has become so large, so unwieldy and so secretive
that no one knows how much money it costs, how many people it employs, how
many programs exist within it or exactly how many agencies do the same work.

*Source information*:

   - *Download **Washington Post
list*<https://sites.google.com/site/cubamoneyproject/wash-post/wash-post.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1>
   * of 1,931 companies involved in top-secret work*
   - *Download **FedSpending
data*<https://sites.google.com/site/cubamoneyproject/fed-spending/fed-spending.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1>
   * showing list of companies that received contracts to carry out work in
   Cuba from 2000 to the roughly the third quarter of 2009.*

*Note: A quick scan showed that at least 37 companies that are on both
lists. I didn’t include companies with similar names. Further investigation
could show that some of these are the same firms.*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to