http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2011/04/04/who-are-the-anti-qaddafi-rebels/

 Who are the anti-Qaddafi
rebels?<http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2011/04/04/who-are-the-anti-qaddafi-rebels/>
Filed under: Libya <http://en.wordpress.com/tag/libya/> — louisproyect @
7:58 pm

*Jihan Hafiz On Reporting From Libya-Real News Network*
**
*2 Videos:*

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vC0OXxZdi34

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LO-920wpFgY
  Comments 
(3)<http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2011/04/04/who-are-the-anti-qaddafi-rebels/#comments>
 
Like<http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2011/04/04/who-are-the-anti-qaddafi-rebels/?like=1&_wpnonce=1a8396c1a8>
Be the first to like this post.
3 Comments 
»<http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2011/04/04/who-are-the-anti-qaddafi-rebels/#postcomment>

   1.

   If this report is correct, then the sequence of imperialist involvement
   was just the reverse of what the WWP/PSL/Johnstone/Blum etc. crew pretends.
   It makes sense that U.S. imperialism would attempt a preemptive penetration
   of sectors of the mass movement in Egypt because

   1) Egypt is a heavily invested US strategic asset; Libya is not;
   2) A workers movement has been active for some years in Egypt before the
   Feb revolution, surely to the knowledge of the CIA, etc;
   3) 1) & 2) make it almost certain that the NED etc. were intervening in
   the middle class organizations to coopt and steer them.

   Their (failed) attempt at pre-emptive involvement shows that the U.S.
   knew in advance how deeply unpopular their Mubarak rendition torture buddy
   had become in Egypt.

   Conversely, this report would further confirm the almost total
   spontaneity of the Libyan uprising, exploding in both East and West Libya.
   The one issue the reporter left out was the question of how much of the
   actual Libyan working class consisted of migrant workers from other
   countries.

   So for the perspective of WWP/PSL/Johnstone/Blum to be consistent, they’d
   have to agree with the conspiracy theory positions of their wacky fringe
   partners: that all of these Arab uprisings (or at least the most important
   Egyptian one) were but color-coded concoctions a la Ukraine hatched out of
   Langley and other nests of imperialism. And the Cheney crew really did
   patiently crawl up the WTC undetected, carefully laying plastic explosives
   at key points in its structure….either that or Libya is an extension of the
   Pan-Arab uprisings. But that would require them to support it in Libya, even
   against Gadhaffi.

   That highlights one truly odd syndrome: These guys really are in awe of
   the superhuman powers of imperialism. In Egypt, in fact, the fusion of the
   middle class “democracy” groups with the working class movement in a massive
   uprising concentrated in a short space of time was not something imperialism
   had been prepared for or planning – that was a theoretical possibility that
   they were trying to head off! That is because imperialism was caught off
   guard by the Tunisian revolution, where the US would not be so involved, as
   Tunisia is not a strategic asset (whereas Bahrain, Yemen, Iraq are), and
   Tunisia was the spark that set Egypt ablaze. It is the very definition of
   revolution, and there was nothing the US, NED, the CIA or anyone else could
   do to steer it from the “inside”. Libya then became a house with neighbors
   on both sides fully ablaze. An explosion was inevitable.

   And now we know why, as this report also confirms the sheer criminal
   murderousness of the Gadhaffi family. They didn’t exactly respond with Cuban
   style mass based committees to discuss the future direction of the country,
   did they?

   Comment by Matt Russo — April 4, 2011 @ 10:38
pm<http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2011/04/04/who-are-the-anti-qaddafi-rebels/#comment-53718>
   2.

   Thanks for this, Lou (and thanks for your interpretive
   querying/summarizing, Matt). I check in with Real News from time to time,
   but on this occasion this report probably would have otherwise eluded me…

   Comment by John Gulick — April 5, 2011 @ 11:06
am<http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2011/04/04/who-are-the-anti-qaddafi-rebels/#comment-53730>
   3.

   Great post. Anyone who watches this and continues to think the movement
   is a CIA creation is a fool.

   Comment by Binh — April 5, 2011 @ 6:59
pm<http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2011/04/04/who-are-the-anti-qaddafi-rebels/#comment-53739>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to