CONTINUED SHREDDING OF CIVIL RIGHTS
*

*
**
*Kevin Gosztola has an investigative piece 
<http://my.firedoglake.com/kgosztola/2011/05/19/fbi-documents-show-us-citizens-targeted-for-interest-in-us-foreign-policy/>
 
going into FBI raids of peace activists, including links to FBI 
documents accidentally left behind in one of the raids.

And Linn Washington has a piece <http://www.thiscantbehappening.net/> on 
the Obama Administration's refusal to look into new evidence that 
military commanders probably ordered the shootings that killed four 
nonviolent peace protesters at Kent State in 1970.  We were told for 
decades that National Guard troops fired on their own.
*
**
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*THE WAR IN LIBYA IS ILLEGAL


*
**

*Glenn Greenwald has a magnificent piece 
<http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/05/19/libya/index.html> 
showing the hypocrisy of President Obama in his latest major war, 
beginning with quotes from presidential candidate Obama:
*

*"**The President does not have power under the Constitution to 
unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not 
involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation," and, "**No 
more ignoring the law when it's inconvenient. That is not who we are. . 
. . We will again set an example for the world that the law is not 
subject to the whims of stubborn rulers."***

*Greenwald's piece concludes, referring to the President's Middle East 
speech yesterday, "**President Obama -- who has presided over lethal 
civilian-killing attacks in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Libya, Pakistan 
and Somalia -- announced: 'we will not tolerate aggression across 
borders.'  That instantly ranks among my favorite political statements 
ever."*

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*HEALTH CARE CRISIS GETTING WORSE


*
**

*Roger Bybee has a piece showing that our health care crisis is getting 
worse 
<http://www.inthesetimes.com/working/entry/7323/insurers_reap_record_profits_hike_premiums_as_families_ponder_their_fa/>,
 
as corporations gouging Americans for health care make record profits.
*

*Corporate media have long been telling us the recession has ended, 
which in modern economic doublespeak means the rich and their 
corporations are doing well, the only thing that counts, as everybody 
else goes under.
*

*Our hopelessly corrupt government bailed out the banksters who 
destroyed the economy with their scams gone awry, leaving their victims, 
the rest of us, in free fall, to hope we don't get sick, because we may 
not have a health care plan, or we may not be able to afford the 
deductibles.
*

------------------------------------------------------------------------

**With our government a sewer of corruption, our elections rigged as 
badly as those of totalitarian regimes, our Supreme Court made up of 
butt-kissing corporate sycophants who would shame Al Capone (who thought 
himself to be a good capitalist), our Congress so bad that it would be 
insulting to streetwalkers to call it a parliament of whores, our mass 
media little more than stenographers to power, and our true rulers, the 
Forces of Greed <http://members.cox.net/libertyuv/FOG.htm>, so ignorant 
and immoral that many of us despair-- there is a brave new international 
group who give us hope.

They would be "Anonymous," the epitome of anarchism.  To date, they have 
toppled totalitarian regimes, and battled with transnational 
corporations more powerful than most nation states.  We can't say at 
/LUV News/ we will support their every future endeavor, but to date we 
find them to be Robin Hoods of the 21st century.

In the past. some Anonymous members have attacked what others have said, 
as though they are the ones to speak for Anonymous.  It does get 
confusing, and because many of their actions are illegal, spokespersons 
are not very public, with law enforcement hot on their tail. 
****Although nobody can truly speak for Anonymous, we believe the 
following piece is representative of the group ****--Jack

**

*ANONYMOUS AND THE ARAB UPRISINGS 
<http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/05/201151917634659824.html>
*

*
*

*by Yasmine Ryan
*

*Anonymous's rapid rise from the depths 
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/may/11/anonymous-behind-the-mask> 
of geekdom to becoming a catalyst and nerve centre for real-life 
revolutionaries is one that has taken even some of its own members by 
surprise.

The loosely-knit hive brings anonymous techies, hackers and, 
increasingly, activists together under a single appellation, united in 
their non-violent but often illegal collective action.

With high-profile campaigns, centred on "distributed denial of service" 
(DDoS) attacks that knock target websites offline, it has been 
transformed from a fringe group of law-breaking pranksters 
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/may/11/anonymous-behind-the-mask> 
that emerged in 2006 into an international movement that draws new 
recruits by their thousands.

In an interview with a group of Anons conducted on their home turf, 
Internet Relay Chat (IRC), they tell Al Jazeera that they are fighting, 
above all, for the free flow of information.
*

*"You can't make a decision on something if you don't know anything 
about it," one Anon says.

"I'm into this because it's a more modern and technical approach than 
traditional activism like protesting against [the] G8 or something like 
that," another adds.

While some traditional activists have criticised the group for its 
methods, few would argue that its unique cocktail of anonymous civil 
society and collective action has proven to be powerful agents of change.

Indeed, Amnesty International, the prominent human rights NGO, chose to 
focus its 2011 annual report 
<http://amnesty.org/en/annual-report/2011/introduction> on what it 
describes as the "critical battle [that is] under way for control of 
access to information, means of communication and networking technology".

Widney Brown, senior director of international law and policy at 
Amnesty's international secretariat, told Al Jazeera that Anonymous' 
outrage over government and corporate pressure against WikiLeaks 
<http://english.aljazeera.net/news/europe/2010/12/2010128133639866230.html/Services/IncludePart/LevelOne/?T=7&Id=200779115947359666&P=&V=2>
 
underlined the hotly contested power dynamics that surround information.

"The desire to be able to speak freely about what is going on in your 
life is something that's always there, but what we have with social 
media is the ability to amplify it," she says.

"Governments are obviously threatened by the fact that activists have 
become so effective at using these new technologies and social media," 
she says.

Amnesty considers the use of non-conventional methods by cyberactivists 
in defense of these principles as justified, so long as they are not 
violating other people's legitimate right to privacy and security, Brown 
says.

Yet for Anonymous, personal privacy is not always sacred, as the very 
public nailing of the HBGary security firm - the firm's CEO's had his 
email hacked and his reputation destroyed in a stinging revenge attack, 
after threatening to reveal the identity of leading Anons - in February 
demonstrated.

*Anti-individualism*

The antithesis of the rampant individualism that the internet has 
fostered, through the likes of Facebook and self-promoting blogs, 
Anonymous represent the untameable wild west of the web, a world where 
geeks teach the corrupt and powerful a lesson.

Using pseudonyms, the Anons gather in the virtual space created by IRC, 
a type of online chatroom where they discuss technology, politics and 
activism, all with a dose of sexual banter and "lulz"(a play on LOL - 
laugh out loud - that describes the thrill of mischievous, and sometimes 
nasty, pranks).

The Anons are very much a product of this type of chat, says Gabriella 
Coleman, an anthropologist at New York University who has been following 
the group for several years.

"If you didn't have IRC, you wouldn't have Anonymous. That's where they 
co-ordinate, that's where they socialise, that's where they have fun, 
that's where they get to know each other," she explains.

In the parallel, more manicured universe of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg 
has insisted that users make their real names known or face deletion, a 
principle that internet activists condemn as potentially 
life-threatening 
<http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2010/12/201012169312449462.html> 
for activists in many parts of the world.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange recently called Facebook an "appalling 
spy machine" 
<http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-20059247-17.html#ixzz1LNaW3qw2>, 
condemning the way in which the social network stores such extensive 
information on its users, information which can potentially be used 
against them by authorities.

For those who frequent IRC, in contrast, anonymous free speech is a 
fundamental value, and one for which they are willing to fight.

Most Anons take precautions to ensure that their identities remain 
hidden from the authorities, and their fellow Anons.

"There's definitely people involved who don't care about the politics, 
but who want to create a kind of space where people can do politics," 
Coleman says.

And it is a space to which many activists have turned to in recent months.

"Many people come here [be]cause they don't know [an]other door where to 
knock to be listened when nobody else hears," one Anon said.

*Anonymous and the Arab Spring*

While mainstream media was slow to tune in to the revolutionary drumbeat 
that has been rising in the Arab world, Anonymous was present from the 
beginning.*

*Tunisian Anons collaborated with their international counterparts on 
Operation Tunisia 
<http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/features/2011/01/20111614145839362.html>, 
which was launched on January 2 - well before most Western media had 
clicked onto the fact that there was a revolution underway.

"We did initially take an interest in Tunisia because of WikiLeaks, but 
as more Tunisians have joined they care more about the general internet 
censorship there, so that's what it has become," one Anon told Al 
Jazeera in the midst of the DDoS attacks 
<http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/features/2011/01/20111614145839362.html> 
on selected Tunisian government sites.

As Anons realised the significance of what was taking place in Tunisia 
-- and the fact that it was being ignored by foreign media -- they 
collaborated with Tunisian dissidents to help them share videos with the 
outside world.

Anonymous quickly created a "care packet", translated into Arabic and 
French, offering cyberdissidents advice on how to conceal their 
identities on the web, in order to avoid detection by the former 
regime's cyberpolice.

They used their collective brainpower to develop a greasemonkey script 
<https://userscripts.org/scripts/show/94122> - an extension for the 
Mozilla Firefox web browser - to help Tunisians evade an extensive 
phishing campaign carried out by the government.

After Tunisia, Anonymous' interest in the wave of protest movements did 
not wane.

In Algeria, whereinternet use is more limited 
<http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/21/technology/21iht-censor.html> and web 
users have been slower to embrace trends like Twitter than their 
Tunisian neighbours, Operation Algeria never really kicked off, much 
like the protests on the street.

Operation Egypt, meanwhile, was launched on January 25 at the request of 
Egyptian activists and is viewed by many Anons as a success. Reflecting 
the mood on the streets of Cairo, it was decided from the outset not to 
attack media or to promote violence.

The Anons worked in collaboration with Telecomix 
<http://cryptoanarchy.org/wiki/Telecomix>, a cluster that uses legal 
means to promote free speech, to restore mirrors and proxies 
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bilJ7lZtutQ> to help restore Egyptians' 
access to sites being censored by the government. They even used faxes 
to communicate important information when the internet was no longer an 
option.

In the operations for Egypt and Tunisia, some lulzy methods were used 
that harked back to Anonymous' past, including placing massive orders 
for pizza to be delivered to the countries' embassies.

In contrast, the IRC channel for Operation Libya took on a more militant 
tone, particularly before NATO agreed to impose a no-fly zone when 
rebels were on the defensive.

"Libyan freedom fighters came to Anonops as a safe meeting point," 
another Anon explains, referring to how some members of the Libyan 
opposition used IRC as a virtual shelter early on in the uprising.

"They were really thankful for listening to them and their problems and 
helping them, although we could only do so much," another Anon adds.

Several Anons interviewed for this article agreed that Anonymous' 
interaction with activists in the Arab world had changed the nature and 
demographics of their own movement.

"Previously, I'd say that Anons were pretty evenly distributed among 
North America, Europe, and Australia," an Anon says.

"But since Anonymous' actions in Tunisia especially, a lot more have 
taken up the Anonymous banner, around the Muslim world especially."

Anonymous did, however, have a history of involvement of rallying in 
support of protest movements against authoritarian governments.

Operation Iran was founded during the protests which followed the 
country's 2009 contested presidential election. The cyberactivists 
launched their subgroup to take down the "hitlist" websites 
<http://www.farsnews.com/imgrep.php?nn=8804010545> of protesters' photos 
which were being published by the Iranian government's supporters.

Al Jazeera spoke to the founding member of Anonymous Iran, who says his 
group has around 15 dedicated members, mainly Iranian nationals living 
overseas, who are joined by hundreds of "seasonal" supports whenever it 
launches a campaign.

"We don't accept users from inside Iran because of the risk," he says in 
an email interview.

"We are fighting for freedom of speech and ideas inside of Iran."

Coleman says that, despite such precedents, Tunisia marks a turning point.

"[Anonymous] went to Tunisia because of the censorship. But in some 
ways, they stayed beyond censorship questions, and that enlarged the 
types of operations they'd be willing to engage in," she says.

"It really shifted the realm of possibility."

Anons in the West found they shared a common goal with those fighting 
oppression elsewhere in the world. And crucially, she says, regardless 
of nationality, religion or politics, Anons the world over are avid geeks.

Jacqui True, an associate professor of international relations at the 
University of Auckland, affirms that Anonymous' involvement in the Arab 
Spring has been an exceptional case of kindred spirits meeting in 
cyberspace.

"They've been led into the Arabic-speaking world by Arabic-speaking 
activists, who they've found common ground with," she says.

"The internet knows no borders, so even those who come to questions of 
political freedom and democracy from really different vantage points and 
from really different experiences can have a common cause."*

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/05/201151917634659824.html
**
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*If you wish to be removed from this list, please let us know*
**
*To join the Liberty Underground news service email 
[email protected] "join" for a subject*
**
*You may also join our talk group 
athttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertyundergroundtalk/ 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertyundergroundtalk/>if you would like 
to participate*
**
*email: [email protected]*
**
*Tell your friends about /LUV News/ because some people just don't get it*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to