http://www.marxist.com/us-sanctions-on-pdvsa.htm
 US sanctions on PDVSA - latest imperialist
provocation<http://www.marxist.com/us-sanctions-on-pdvsa.htm>
Written by Jorge Martín Wednesday, 25 May 2011
[image: Print] <http://www.marxist.com/us-sanctions-on-pdvsa/print.htm#>

On Tuesday May 25, the US imposed penalties against Venezuelan state-owned
company PDVSA, and another 6 companies from other countries, for conducting
business with Iran.  The sanctions are part of an attempt by Washington to
step up the pressure against Iran in relation to its nuclear program. They
are also an act of blatant bullying directed against Venezuela.

[image: Trabajadores de PDVSA por el control obrero]
<http://www.marxist.com/images/stories/venezuela/PDVSA_control_obrero.jpg>These
penalties are imposed within the framework of the Comprehensive
Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act passed in the US in July
2010, which expands and tightens the 1996 Iran Sanctions Act. They mean that
PDVSA will be barred from any U.S. government contracts, U.S. import-export
financing and export licenses for sensitive technology.

However this will not affect PDVSA oil sales to the US (which amount to 1.2
million barrels a day) nor the operations of PDVSA’s subsidiary in the US,
CITGO. The Americans do not like Hugo Chavez, but they are very partial to
Venezuela’s oil. Therefore, their “hard line” does not extend to an oil
embargo.

These acts have no standing in international law as they attempt to rule
over the activities of companies, individuals or governments* outside* the
USA, and therefore *outside *of the jurisdiction of US law. However,
international legality has never worried imperialism. The sanctions and
boycott laws against the Cuban Revolution implemented by Washington are also
illegal and have been rejected on numerous occasions by the United Nations,
which has not made an atom of difference.

International law, the UN, the ICHR and other international institutions are
just a fig leaf to cover, on occasion, the real intentions of US
imperialism. If they are able to get their aims backed by “international
law” that is useful, of course, from the point of view of fooling public
opinion, but if for whatever reason they cannot, they just go ahead
regardless.

When all is said and done, international relations are based on the power
one country has to impose its will on others. It is based, not on abstract
principles or legality, but on gunships, aircraft carriers and missiles. And
since the USA is by far the largest military power on earth, no-one is going
to impose “internal law” on them.

As well as being directed against Iran, these penalties are also part of the
propaganda campaign against Venezuela, particularly in the run up to the
crucial 2012 presidential elections. As a matter of fact (so far at least)
these penalties will not seriously affect the operations of PDVSA. Their
aim, at the moment, is mainly to strengthen the propaganda campaign against
Chavez and the Venezuelan revolution.

US Senator Richard Lugar, the highest-ranking Republican in the US Senate
Committee on Foreign Relations, spelt this out clearly when he said that
penalties against PDVSA were the result of: "Venezuela's unwillingness to
break relations with *terrorist organizations and with countries which
sponsor them*.”

This is the voice of imperialist arrogance. The rulers of the USA claim to
have the right to dictate to other countries that they do business with, and
if they don’t comply, they will be “leaned upon”. These are the methods, not
of international law, but of a Mafia Godfather.

Similar statements have been coming out of the United States recently:

 “Chavez is making himself the Osama Bin Laden and the Ahmedinejad of the
Western Hemisphere,” Rep. Connie Mack (R-FL) told Republicans during the
Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington in February 2011.

“Chavez himself could develop a nuclear weapon,” said Roger Noriega, Former
Assistant Secretary of State for the Western Hemisphere, during the “Danger
in the Andes” conference in Congress on November 17, 2010.

“We need a systematic policy to change the regime in Venezuela and that is
serious issue,” added John P. Waters, former director, White House Office of
Drug Control Policy, on November 17, 2010.

The idea is to smear the Bolivarian revolution and the government of Hugo
Chávez as “supporters of terrorism”, “developing nuclear weapons” and
generally linking them up with “rogue regimes”, in order to prepare public
opinion in the USA and elsewhere for action against the Venezuelan
revolution.

The latest episode of this propaganda campaign is the bizarre allegation by
the German sensationalist newspaper *Die Welt*, that the Chavez government
had reached a secret deal with Iran, so that Iran could build medium-range
missile launch pads in the Paraguaná peninsula in Venezuela. The only source
given for this clearly false allegation was “Western security insiders”.

Then we had the publication by the London-based International Institute of
Strategic Studies of a selection of emails and documents allegedly coming
from the laptops of FARC commander Raul Reyes which “prove” that the
Venezuelan government has been supporting and harbouring the Colombian “FARC
terrorists”.

Never mind the fact that Interpol itself declared that thousands of those
files had been modified (i.e. doctored) and created *after* the laptops were
seized by the Colombian army, that the chain of custody had not been
properly secured and that proper forensic procedures had not been followed
in handling them.

Never mind the fact that the Colombian Supreme Court has just ruled that any
evidence from the Raul Reyes laptops is* not admissible in court* because it
was obtained during an *illegal incursion into Ecuadorean territory*.
Clearly, the IISG does not think that the facts should be allowed to get in
the way of a good story.

It should be noted that the IISG is the same institute which also produced
the infamous report on weapons of mass destruction which served to sell the
case for the invasion of Iraq to the British public. The point is that by
publishing these so-called emails and files they have captured the headlines
about Venezuela for a couple of days and strengthened the idea that
Venezuela is a country that supports terrorists and therefore “something
must be done about it”.

The publication of these “documents” *after* the Venezuelan government
handed over Colombian political exile Joaquín Pérez Becerra to the
authorities in Bogotá is very significant. It shows that no amount of
appeasement and concessions made to Washington and its puppets in Colombia
will stop the campaign against the Venezuelan Revolution. Let’s not forget
that the “proof” that Bogotá used to accuse Perez Becerra was based on the
same Raul Reyes laptops files which have been now been ruled inadmissible by
the Colombian Supreme Court.

>From the point of view of the Venezuelan Revolution, PDVSA is an extremely
sensitive target. It was the revolution which unraveled plans for the
privatization of the oil company. It was the sacking of the pro-imperialist
and reactionary PDVSA managers by Chavez which sparked the coup in 2002. It
was PDVSA which was the main target of the criminal bosses’ lock out of
December 2002 and January 2003, when thousands of well paid engineers and
managers of the company abandoned their jobs and sabotaged the operations
with the aim of bringing down the democratically elected government.

It was when the Bolivarian government took over PDVSA that it got the
necessary resources to launch the massive social programs (*Misiones*) to
deliver health care, education and subsidized food products to the majority.
It is no surprise then that opposition members of the Venezuelan National
Assembly refused to vote for a resolution condemning the sanctions against
PDVSA and calling on the government to take retaliatory measures. They have
shown who their master is. The Venezuelan oligarchy is anti-national and
pro-imperialist. They would rather have their own country taken over by
imperialism, than accept the democratic will of the majority of Venezuelans.

In each one of these occasions in which PDVSA was threatened by the attacks
of the reactionary ruling class, it was the mobilization of the people and
the workers that saved the revolution. In the case of the oil sabotage it
was particularly the oil workers, who took over the installations and ran
them under workers’ control, which defeated the reactionary offensive. For
this reason it is absolutely correct that the response of the Foreign
Affairs Ministry to this latest provocation from Washington “calls on all
the Venezuelan people, the working class and especially the oil workers, to
stay alert and mobilized in defense of our PDVSA and the sacred sovereignty
of the homeland.”

*It has been proven time and time again that only the revolutionary
mobilization of the workers and the poor can effectively defend the
Venezuelan revolution and inspire the workers of the world to come to its
support. No amount of diplomatic maneuvering can achieve that*.

In a previous occasion when, faced with the provocations from Washington,
Chavez threatened to cut oil supplies to the US, the Venezuelan oil workers
responded with a massive march in Caracas. They declared they were ready to
defend the revolution, but at the same time pointed out the sabotaging role
played by many of the managers in the oil industry, not a small number of
them having participated in the 2002-03 sabotage and having sneaked back
into the industry. The oil workers pointed out that only through workers’
control in PDVSA could the industry be defended against attacks and sabotage
and this is absolutely correct.

The oligarchy, the capitalists, bankers and *latifundia* owners, are the
direct agents of imperialism in Venezuela, as was graphically shown in the
National Assembly vote. *In order effectively to defend the country against
imperialist attacks and provocations their power needs to be broken. Above
all this means their economic power. Their properties should be expropriated
and put under democratic workers’ control. The marvelous national gathering
of socialist workers’ councils to discuss workers’ control, which took place
at the SIDOR steel works on May 21-22 with the presence of 900 worker
representatives from all over the country, shows the way forward.*

*The revolution can be defended against imperialism if it is completed as a
socialist revolution, abolishing capitalism. On that basis it can launch an
internationalist appeal for the workers in other countries to follow its
example. Such a call would have an electrifying impact throughout Latin
America, but also in the Arab world and in Europe and the USA where the
workers are now being made to pay the price of the crisis of capitalism.*

   - *Down with imperialism!*
   - *Defend the Venezuelan revolution!*
   - *Long live international socialism!*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to