http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/07/22-9
Unions, MoveOn Warn Obama Not to 'Cave' in Secret Negotiations With House GOP by John Nichols <http://www.commondreams.org/john-nichols> TheNation.com: July 22, 2011 The Obama White House is reportedly in the process of negotiating a secret debt deal with House Republican leaders that could include deep cuts to Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. The deal would not, according to media reports, significantly or immediately address the need for new revenues that can be derived from fair taxation of the wealthiest Americans. That's a bad deal. Bad for American seniors and Americans who anticipate that one day they will be seniors. Bad for the American economy. And bad for Barack Obama politically. So unions and progressive groups have moved to prevent any deal from moving forward. MoveOn.org, AFL-CIO, CREDO Action, Democracy for America, PCCC, AFT, Campaign for America's Future and Change Nation organized an Emergency Call-In Day "to demand Democrats in the House and Senate stand strong and keep their promises to reject any debt deal that slashes programs for seniors and working families while doing little or nothing to make the rich and corporations pay their share." Tens of thousands of call were being made Friday to Democrats in the House and Senate "demanding that they reject the terrible deal being reportedly negotiated by the White House." And union leaders were speaking up in blunt opposition to any compromise by the president and the Democrats on the issue of preserving Medicare. "If press reports about a potential deal on deficit reduction turn out to be true, Medicaid will be eviscerated, access to healthcare for millions of Americans will be gutted and millions of jobs will be lost. This is morally wrong and Congress should not allow it to happen," declared Service Employees International Union president Mary Kay Henry. "Reported revenue measures in the deal are worse than the 'Gang of Six' proposal and let corporations and millionaires off the hook and avoid paying their fair share," continued Henry, whose union has long been closely aligned with Obama. "On behalf of 2.1 million members, SEIU will not support a deal with these outcomes." Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders was already rallying opposition to any deal that cuts Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, saying: "The time is now for the American people to become significantly involved in that debate and not leave it to a small number of people here in Washington." MoveOn.org executive director Justin Ruben warned: "Any deal that slashes programs for seniors and working families while doing nothing to make the rich and corporations pay their share is a total non-starter and Democrats in Congress should rule it out immediately." "The Democratic base did not work night and day to elect Democrats so that they could cave to Tea Party extremists who are intent on gutting the social safety net millions of us fought to establish and protect," explained Ruben, who notes that House minority leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate majority leader Harry Reid have worked long and hard to highlight Democratic opposition to this sort of deal. "Leaders Pelosi and Reid have been clear that a deal that includes no revenues, or that cuts Social Security and Medicare benefits, cannot get the votes of their respective caucuses. Democratic Members of Congress must keep up this strong stance. Anything less would represent a betrayal of everything Democrats stand for." Obama and his aides want to cut a deal. But they cannot cut just any deal. If the White House assaults programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, the president will find-either quickly, via opposition from Congressional Democrats, or over time, via the collapse of energy and enthusiasm among his party's activist base-that he is negotiating away not just his party's legacy but perhaps the prospect of his own reelection. John Nichols is Washington correspondent for The Nation and associate editor of The Capital Times in Madison, Wisconsin. His most recent book is The <http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/184467679X?ie=UTF8&tag=commondreams-20&lin kCode=xm2&camp=1789&creativeASIN=184467679X> "S" Word: A Short History of an American Tradition. A co-founder of the media reform organization Free Press, Nichols is co-author with Robert W. McChesney of The Death and Life of American Journalism: The Media Revolution <http://www.amazon.com/dp/1568586051?tag=commondreams-20/ref=nosim> that Will Begin the World Again and Tragedy <http://www.amazon.com/dp/1595581294?tag=commondreams-20/ref=nosim> & Farce: How the American Media Sell Wars, Spin Elections, and Destroy Democracy. Nichols' other books include: Dick: The Man Who is President <http://www.amazon.com/dp/1565848403?tag=commondreams-20/ref=nosim> and The Genius of Impeachment: The Founders' Cure for Royalism. <http://www.amazon.com/dp/1595581405?tag=commondreams-20/ref=nosim> * * * <http://rain.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=8c08f97b142bb05db019d489b&id= 1eaed90e41&e=b0842707b4> http://www.counterpunch.org/tariq07202011.html Tariq Ali: The Problem That Won't Go Away -- Murdoch: Will Anything Really Change? Tariq Ali is the author of The Duel: Pakistan on the Flightpath of American Power. CounterPunch: July 20, 2011 The rottenness of British political culture, in a country where the lives of so many have been subjugated by lies for so long, has now been on public view for the last few weeks. The country's most powerful media baron is forced by events to close down his profitable Sunday paper-News of the World--- specializing in celebrity sex stories and using its close links with the police to get tip-offs about murder investigations, disappearances, etc. They went too far by hacking the mobile phone of a murder victim and stealing the messages, thus creating an impression that she might still be alive. It was this that triggered a nationwide revulsion shining the torch on politicians and the senior most policemen in the country. Why had David Cameron hired a senior Murdoch journalist as his press chief? Why had Scotland Yard hired another senior journalist from the same stable? Of course we know why, but the fact that it has now become an outrage makes it unacceptable. It's a very British scandal, of the sort that erupts suddenly and immediately becomes a national preoccupation. One almost feels that the psycho-politics underlying this for most people, those who live outside the bubble world of power, money and celebritydom, is partially escapist and a substitute for the anger that people genuinely feel against a corrupt and corrupting political establishment of the country: bankers, media barons, politicians, judges and the police. The economy is in a mess, austerity measures are in place, Scotland is seriously disaffected, but at least Members of Parliament can question Rupert Murdoch and his son and watch them apologizing and cringing in public. Murdoch came to life twice. First when he applauded the Daily Telegraph for exposing MP's fiddling their expenses and urged them to follow the transparent model offered by Singapore and secondly when a protester threw some shaving foam at him and got punched by Wendi Murdoch. For the rest the Murdochs put on a good double act. Young James sounding like an Enron executive after the collapse and a moist-eyed Rupert explaining how he had learnt his journalism from his brilliant father who had exposed the disaster at Gallipoli. And after the rehearsed drama? Even if Murdoch doesn't aquire all of BskyB, will anything really change? The Murdoch Empire has dominated British politics since the days of Margaret Thatcher. She gave him satellite television. He destroyed the print unions and his newspapers helped to destroy the miners. He was instrumental in creating a culture that glorified privatizations, free-market dogmas, wars, (all of Murdoch's nearly 300 papers in different parts of the world supported the Iraq war), etc. The right-wing populism unleashed by the Thatcher-Murdoch combination neutered the public ethos created after the Second World War. So strong was this influence that others newspapers and television networks (like Channel Four and the BBC) lost confidence in themselves and became pale imitations in search of circulations and ratings. Classical music, loved by many regardless of class or creed or race, was considered elitist and disallowed on BBC 2. Thatcher's Blue Labour heirs, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown continued the worship of money and Murdoch. Blair continuously abased himself before the media baron. Brown did the same. Murdoch press editors became regular guests at official residences; their own private parties regularly attended by Prime Ministers and their entourage. Just yesterday Murdoch said that he and Gordon Brown met regularly. Their families became friends. David Cameron followed suit, making it clear that despite his class background he could be just like Blair and embrace anyone and everything that linked big money and politics. It was Peter Oborne, a journalist writing for the always-conservative Daily Telegraph who provided a coruscating pen-portrait of Cameron, suggesting that he had consciously descended to the sewer by becoming part of the louche Chipping Norton set: "He should never have employed Andy Coulson, the News of the World editor, as his director of communications. He should never have cultivated Rupert Murdoch. And - the worst mistake of all - he should never have allowed himself to become a close friend of Rebekah Brooks, the chief executive of the media giant News International, whose departure from that company in shame and disgrace can only be a matter of time. We are talking about a pattern of behaviour here. Indeed, it might be better described as a course of action. Mr Cameron allowed himself to be drawn into a social coterie in which no respectable person, let alone a British prime minister, should be seen dead." Cameron has shown himself quite as authoritarian and opportunist as Blair in his handling of the party. But if the political lava from this volcanic scandal continues to flow, the British Prime Minister, currently wounded by the revelations might have little option but to fall on his sword. We have not reached that stage. Meanwhile the trilateral consensus in the British Parliament will not break with neo-liberalism and its dogmas that are creating havoc throughout Europe. That is the problem which, unlike Murdoch's battered media empire, won't go away. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digest: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post: <mailto:[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
