http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/12/opinion/the-hijacked-crisis.html?_r=1
<http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/12/opinion/the-hijacked-crisis.html?_r=1&nl=
todaysheadlines&emc=tha212> &nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha212

 


The Hijacked Crisis


By Paul Krugman

NY Times Op-Ed: August 12, 2011

 

Has market turmoil left you feeling afraid? Well, it should. Clearly, the
economic crisis that began in 2008 is by no means over. 

But there's another emotion you should feel: anger. For what we're seeing
now is what happens when influential people exploit a crisis rather than try
to solve it. 

For more than a year and a half - ever since President Obama chose to make
deficits, not jobs, the central focus of the 2010 State of the Union address
- we've had a public conversation that has been dominated by budget
concerns, while almost ignoring unemployment. The supposedly urgent need to
reduce deficits has so dominated the discourse that on Monday, in the midst
of a market panic, Mr. Obama devoted most of his remarks to the deficit
rather than to the clear and present danger of renewed recession. 

What made this so bizarre was the fact that markets were signaling, as
clearly as anyone could ask, that unemployment rather than deficits is our
biggest problem. Bear in mind that deficit hawks have been warning for years
that interest rates on U.S. government debt would soar any day now; the
threat from the bond market was supposed to be the reason that we must slash
the deficit now now now. But that threat keeps not materializing. And, this
week, on the heels of a downgrade that was supposed to scare bond investors,
those interest rates actually plunged to record lows. 

What the market was saying - almost shouting - was, "We're not worried about
the deficit! We're worried about the weak economy!" For a weak economy means
both low interest rates and a lack of business opportunities, which, in
turn, means that government bonds become an attractive investment even at
very low yields. If the downgrade of U.S. debt had any effect at all, it was
to reinforce fears of austerity policies that will make the economy even
weaker. 

So how did Washington discourse come to be dominated by the wrong issue? 

Hard-line Republicans have, of course, played a role. Although they don't
seem to truly care about deficits - try suggesting any rise in taxes on the
rich - they have found harping on deficits a useful way to attack government
programs. 

But our discourse wouldn't have gone so far off-track if other influential
people hadn't been eager to change the subject away from jobs, even in the
face of 9 percent unemployment, and to hijack the crisis on behalf of their
pre-existing agendas. 

Check out the opinion page of any major newspaper, or listen to any
news-discussion program, and you're likely to encounter some self-proclaimed
centrist declaring that there are no short-run fixes for our economic
difficulties, that the responsible thing is to focus on long-run solutions
and, in particular, on "entitlement reform" - that is, cuts in Social
Security and Medicare. And when you do encounter such a person, you should
be aware that people like that are a major reason we're in so much trouble. 

For the fact is that right now the economy desperately needs a short-run
fix. When you're bleeding profusely from an open wound, you want a doctor
who binds that wound up, not a doctor who lectures you on the importance of
maintaining a healthy lifestyle as you get older. When millions of willing
and able workers are unemployed, and economic potential is going to waste to
the tune of almost $1 trillion a year, you want policy makers who work on a
fast recovery, not people who lecture you on the need for long-run fiscal
sustainability. 

Unfortunately, giving lectures on long-run fiscal sustainability is a
fashionable Washington pastime; it's what people who want to sound serious
do to demonstrate their seriousness. So when the crisis struck and led to
big budget deficits - because that's what happens when the economy shrinks
and revenue plunges - many members of our policy elite were all too eager to
seize on those deficits as an excuse to change the subject from jobs to
their favorite hobbyhorse. And the economy continued to bleed. 

What would a real response to our problems involve? First of all, it would
involve more, not less, government spending for the time being - with mass
unemployment and incredibly low borrowing costs, we should be rebuilding our
schools, our roads, our water systems and more. It would involve aggressive
moves to reduce household debt via mortgage forgiveness and refinancing. And
it would involve an all-out effort by the Federal Reserve to get the economy
moving, with the deliberate goal of generating higher inflation to help
alleviate debt problems. 

The usual suspects will, of course, denounce such ideas as irresponsible.
But you know what's really irresponsible? Hijacking the debate over a crisis
to push for the same things you were advocating before the crisis, and
letting the economy continue to bleed. 

 

* * *

 

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/08/10-11


"Super Congress" Designed for One Purpose


Thoughts About the Catfood II "Super Congress" Appointments


by Jane Hamsher <http://www.commondreams.org/jane-hamsher> 

FireDogLake.com
<http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2011/08/10/thoughts-about-the-catfood-ii-s
uper-congress-appointments/> : August 10, 2011  

1.      There are no good choices for this commission. It is designed to
protect members of Congress from the electoral repercussions of cutting
Social Security and Medicare benefits, something that 82% of the country
vehemently opposes. A full 60% of the country thinks the wars are
responsible for the deficit, but the money for war will not be touched. The
committee exists solely to impose the will of a small minority of oligarchic
elites on the nation, and rob millions of Americans of the retirement
insurance they have been faithfully and honorably been paying into their
entire adult lives. The fact that the committee exists at all represents the
breakdown of the social contract.

2. The US government is the
<http://washingtontechnology.com/toplists/top-100-lists/2010.aspx>  largest
contractor in the world. Lockheed Martin: $16.7 billion in 2010. Boeing:
$10.5 billion. Hewlett-Packard: $2.3 billion. IBM: $1.8 billion. These
companies spend millions each year bribing elected officials for pennies on
the dollar in exchange for these contracts. They do not want to be the one
on the chopping block. Appointing the Chair of the DSCC to the committee -
whose job is collecting campaign contributions on behalf of Senate Democrats
- is like putting up a "for sale" sign. Democrats would be screaming bloody
<http://www.nrsc.org/about-the-nrsc/nrsc-chairman/>  murder if John Cornyn
were appointed. Greenberg-Quinlan-Rossner polling finds that the only
message polling well for Democrats right now is "reducing the influence of
lobbyists and money in Congress." Way to go with the optics, Harry Reid.

3. Jon Kyl is the Senate Minority Whip. Kyl walked
<http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/eric-cantor-jon-kyl-drop-out-of-biden-defi
cit-talks/>  out of the Biden talks with Eric Cantor in order to force Obama
to take ownership of the deal. Toomey is a member of the Tea Party who
authored
<http://1stamendmentdomainrevenuerecoveryservices.us/first-amendment-watch/g
op-senators-all-back-toomey-balanced-budget-bill>  a balanced budget
amendment and will vote for increased revenues when hell freezes over. Rob
Portman is a former budget director under George Bush. Dave Camp and Jeb
Hensarling are Catfood
<http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2010/05/10/obama-packs-debt-committee-with
-supportes-of-social-security-benefit-cuts-and-privatization/>  Commission I
retreads. Fred Upton's niece is a Sports
<http://www.mymodernmet.com/profiles/blogs/kate-upton-in-sports>
Illustrated swimsuit model.

4. The Democratic House appointees will be meaningless. With three
Democratic "grand bargain" Senate appointees, there is already a strong
majority in favor of cutting Social Security and Medicare benefits.

3. None of these 6 Senators is up for reelection soon, and the House members
are in safe districts (notice no Paul Ryan). That exacerbates the
anti-democratic nature of (1) above.

The only thing these committee members are going to respond to is their
fellow members of Congress who are up for reelection. They need to start
telling them that they will be the ones will who bear the burden of whatever
decision the committee makes, but they're all in the throes of an austerity
fit. They need to hear from you.

At FireDogLake, we're running a new round of online ads on Facebook and
Google targeted to voters in 2012 swing states. Some of these ads are about
opposing the coming benefit cuts from the Super Congress, and joining our
pledge to oppose anyone who votes for them.

Others are focused on individual members of Congress to pressure them not to
vote for the Super Congress' final recommendations, and let them know
members know what the consequence will be in 2012 if they do. Click
<https://secure.firedoglake.com/page/contribute/supercongress-ads?source=JHP
ost>  here to see some of the ads and consider chipping in $15 or more to
help us get them online, in front of as many voters as possible.

C 2011 FireDogLake

 <http://www.commondreams.org/jane-hamsher> Jane Hamsher

Jane Hamsher is the founder of firedoglake.com
<http://firedoglake.blogspot.com/> . Her work has also appeared on The Daily
Beat, Common Dreams, AlterNet, The Nation and The American Prospect.

 

 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Reply via email to