The Crime Of Making Americans Aware Of Their Own History
By William Blum
October 04, 2011 "Information Clearing House" -- Is history getting too close
for comfort for the fragile little
American heart and mind? Their schools and their favorite media have
done an excellent job of keeping them ignorant of what their favorite
country has done to the rest of the world, but lately some discomforting points
of view have managed to find their way into this well-defended
American consciousness.
First, Congressman Ron Paul during a presidential debate last month expressed
the belief
that those who carried out the September 11 attack were retaliating for
the many abuses perpetrated against Arab countries by the United States
over the years. The audience booed him, loudly.
Then, popular-song icon Tony Bennett, in a radio interview, said the United
States caused
the 9/11 attacks because of its actions in the Persian Gulf, adding that
President George W. Bush had told him in 2005 that the Iraq war was a
mistake. Bennett of course came under some nasty fire. FOX News (September 24),
carefully choosing its comments charmingly as usual,
used words like "insane", "twisted mind", and "absurdities". Bennett
felt obliged to post a statement on Facebook saying that his experience
in World War II had taught him that "war is the lowest form of human
behavior." He said there's no excuse for terrorism, and he added, "I'm
sorry if my statements suggested anything other than an expression of
love for my country." (NBC September 21)
Then came the
Islamic cleric, Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen, who for some time
had been blaming US foreign policy in the Middle East as the cause of
anti-American hatred and terrorist acts. So we killed him. Ron Paul and
Tony Bennett can count themselves lucky.
What, then, is the basis of all this? What has the United States actually been
doing in the Middle East in the recent past?
* the shooting down of two Libyan planes in 1981
* the bombing of Lebanon in 1983 and 1984
* the bombing of Libya in 1986
* the bombing and sinking of an Iranian ship in 1987
* the shooting down of an Iranian passenger plane in 1988
* the shooting down of two more Libyan planes in 1989
* the massive bombing of the Iraqi people in 1991
* the continuing bombings and draconian sanctions against Iraq for the
next 12 years
* the bombing of Afghanistan and Sudan in 1998
* the habitual support of Israel despite the routine devastation and
torture it inflicts upon the Palestinian people
* the habitual condemnation of Palestinian resistance to this
* the abduction of "suspected terrorists" from Muslim countries, such
as Malaysia,
Pakistan, Lebanon and Albania, who were then taken to places like Egypt
and Saudi Arabia, where they were tortured
* the large military and hi-tech presence in Islam's holiest land,
Saudi Arabia, and elsewhere in the Persian Gulf region
* the support of
numerous undemocratic, authoritarian Middle East governments from the
Shah of Iran to Mubarak of Egypt to the Saudi royal family
* the invasion, bombing and occupation of Afghanistan, 2001 to the
present, and Iraq, 2003 to the present
* the bombings and continuous firing of missiles to assassinate
individuals in Somalia,
Yemen, Pakistan, and Libya during the period of 2006-2011
It can't be
repeated or emphasized enough. The biggest lie of the "war on
terrorism", although weakening, is that the targets of America's attacks have
an irrational hatred of the United States and its way of life,
based on religious and cultural misunderstandings and envy. The large
body of evidence to the contrary includes a 2004 report from the Defense
Science Board, "a Federal advisory committee established to provide
independent advice to the Secretary of Defense." The report states:
"Muslims do not
hate our freedom, but rather they hate our policies. The overwhelming
majority voice their objections to what they see as one-sided support in favor
of Israel and against Palestinian rights, and the long-standing,
even increasing, support for what Muslims collectively see as tyrannies, most
notably Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Pakistan and the Gulf states. Thus, when
American public diplomacy talks about bringing democracy to
Islamic societies, this is seen as no more than self-serving hypocrisy."
The report concludes: "No public relations campaign can save America from
flawed policies." (Christian Science Monitor, November 29, 2004)
The Pentagon released the study after the New York Times ran a story about it
on November 24, 2004. The Times reported that although the board's report does
not constitute official
government policy, it captures "the essential themes of a debate that is now
roiling not just the Defense Department but the entire United
States government."
"Homeland
security is a rightwing concept fostered following 9/11 as the answer to the
effects of 50 years of bad foreign policies in the middle east. The amount of
homeland security we actually need is inversely related to
how good our foreign policy is." – Sam Smith, editor of The Progressive Review
The lies that will not die
In his September
22 address at the United Nations, Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
mentioned the Nazi Holocaust just twice:
"Some European countries still use the Holocaust, after six decades, as the
excuse to pay fines or ransom to the Zionists."
>"They threaten anyone who questions the Holocaust and the September 11 event
>with sanctions and military action."
That was it.
By the term
"questions the Holocaust" the Iranian president has made clear
repeatedly over the years what he's referring to. He has commented about the
peculiarity and injustice of a tragedy which took place in Europe
resulting in a state for the Jews in the Middle East instead of in
Europe. Why are the Palestinians paying a price for a German crime? he
asks. And he has questioned the figure of six million Jews killed by
Nazi Germany, as have many historians and others of all political
stripes who think the total was probably less. This has nothing to do
with the Holocaust not taking place.
But, as usual, the Western media pretends that it doesn't understand.
The New York Post (September 22) referred to the Iranian president as "the
world's
foremost Holocaust denier, the would-be genocidist Ahmadinejad".
Agence France Presse (September 22) stated: "The Iranian leader repeated
comments casting doubt on the origins of the Holocaust."
The Washington Post wrote of "Ahmadinejad's speech suggesting larger
conspiracies were
behind the Holocaust and the Sept. 11 attacks caused delegates to walk
out." (September 23)
And Amy Goodman on Democracy Now! (September 23) included this amongst the
radio program's news
headlines: "For the third straight year, Ahmadinejad sent delegates to
the exits after questioning the Nazi Holocaust."
Without further
explanation of that incendiary term — and none was given — what can
"questioning the Nazi Holocaust" mean or imply to most listeners other
than that Ahmadinejad was questioning whether the Holocaust had actually taken
place?
Once again I must
point out that I have yet to read of Ahmadinejad ever saying simply,
clearly, unambiguously, and unequivocally that he thinks that what we
know as the Holocaust never happened. For the record, in a speech at
Columbia University on September 24, 2007, in reply to a question about
the Holocaust, the Iranian president declared: "I'm not saying that it
didn't happen at all. This is not the judgment that I'm passing here."
Indeed, I do not know if any of the so-called "Holocaust-deniers" actually,
ever, umm, y'know ... deny the Holocaust. They question certain aspects of the
Holocaust history that's been
handed down to us, but they don't explicitly say that what we know as
the Holocaust never took place. (Yes, I'm sure you can find at least one
nut-case somewhere.)
Another enduring
lie about Ahmadinejad is that he has called for violence against Israel: His
2005 remark re "wiping Israel off the map", besides being a very
questionable translation, has been seriously misinterpreted, as
evidenced by the fact that the following year he declared: "The Zionist
regime will be wiped out soon, the same way the Soviet Union was, and
humanity will achieve freedom." (Associated Press, December 12, 2006)
Obviously, the man was not calling for any kind of violent attack upon Israel,
for the dissolution of the Soviet Union took place
peacefully.
Carl Oglesby
The president of
Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), 1965-66, died September 13, age 76. I
remember him best for a speech of his I heard during the March on Washington,
November 27, 1965, a speech passionately received by the
tens of thousands crowding the National Mall:
The original
commitment in Vietnam was made by President Truman, a mainstream
liberal. It was seconded by President Eisenhower, a moderate liberal. It was
intensified by the late President Kennedy, a flaming liberal. Think of the men
who now engineer that war — those who study the maps, give
the commands, push the buttons, and tally the dead: Bundy, McNamara,
Rusk, Lodge, Goldberg, the President [Johnson] himself. They are not
moral monsters. They are all honorable men. They are all liberals.
He insisted that
America's founding fathers would have been on his side. "Our dead
revolutionaries would soon wonder why their country was fighting against what
appeared to be a revolution." He challenged those who called him
anti-American: "I say, don't blame me for that! Blame those who mouthed
my liberal values and broke my American heart."
We are dealing
now with a colossus that does not want to be changed. It will not change
itself. It will not cooperate with those who want to change it. Those
allies of ours in the government — are they really our allies? If they
are, then they don't need advice, they need constituencies; they don't
need study groups, they need a movement. And if they are not [our
allies], then all the more reason for building that movement with the
most relentless conviction.
It saddens me to
think that virtually nothing has changed for the better in US foreign
policy since Carl Oglesby spoke on the Mall that day. America's wars are
ongoing, perpetual, eternal. And the current war monger in the White
House is regarded by many as a liberal, for whatever that's worth.
"We took space
back quickly, expensively, with total panic and close to maximum
brutality," war correspondent Michael Herr recalled about the US
military in Vietnam. "Our machine was devastating. And versatile. It
could do everything but stop."
Items of interest from a journal I've kept for 40 years, part V
* A Bush
administration regulation on Sept. 30, 2004 said Americans cannot buy or smoke
Cuban cigars even in countries where the cigars are legal, such
as Canada, Mexico, Europe, indeed most of the world. The same goes for
Havana Club rum and other Cuban products.
* April 26th, 2007 posting from the courageous but anonymous Iraqi
woman who has, since
August 2003, published the indispensable blog Baghdad Burning. Her
family, she reported, was finally giving up and going into exile. In her final
dispatch, she wrote: "There are moments when the injustice of
having to leave your country simply because an imbecile got it into his
head to invade it, is overwhelming. It is unfair that in order to
survive and live normally, we have to leave our home and what remains of family
and friends. ... And to what?"
* "God appointed
America to save the world in any way that suits America. God appointed
Israel to be the nexus of America's Middle Eastern policy and anyone who wants
to mess with that idea is a) anti-Semitic, b) anti-American, c)
with the enemy, and d) a terrorist."— John LeCarre (London Times, January 15,
2003)
* Army Gen. David
Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq admonished his troops regarding the
results of an Army survey that found that many U.S. military
personnel there are willing to tolerate some torture of suspects and
unwilling to report abuse by comrades. "This fight depends on securing
the population, which must understand that we — not our enemies — occupy the
moral high ground," he wrote in an open letter dated May 10 and
posted on a military Web site. (Washington Post, May 11, 2007)
* "To most of its
citizens, America is exceptional, and it's only natural that it should
take exception to certain international standards." — Michael Ignatieff, former
Canadian politician and Washington Post columnist
* It is easy to
understand an observation by one of Israel's leading military
historians, Martin van Creveld. After the U.S. invaded Iraq, knowing it
to be defenseless, he noted, "Had the Iranians not tried to build
nuclear weapons, they would be crazy." — Noam Chomsky
* "It is easier
for an American member of Congress to criticize an American president
than to criticize an Israeli Prime Minister; it is easier for them to
criticize an unjust and unwarranted US war than one launched by Israel." —
Jeffrey Blankfort
* Ken Livingston,
Mayor of London, re: his visit to Cuba in 2006: "What really stood out
for me was hearing first hand from people working in the medical
services just how appalling the US blockade is. When you meet people who are
treating eye disorders and blindness on a huge scale and they
describe how difficult it is to get the equipment they need except
through indirect routes because of the blockade you get a feel for the
scale of the injustice that is being imposed on Cuba." Livingston might
have added that the "indirect routes", even if available, are much more
expensive.
* In 1965 when UN
Secretary-General U Thant tried to open back-channel ties to the North
Vietnamese, US Secretary of State Dean Rusk called him off by shouting:
"Who do you think you are, a country?" (Washington Post BookWorld, January 7,
2007)
* George W. Bush:
"Years from now when America looks out on a democratic Middle East,
growing in freedom and prosperity, Americans will speak of the battles
like Fallujah with the same awe and reverence that we now give to
Guadalcanal and Iwo Jima" in World War II. (Associated Press, November 11, 2006)
* The National
Endowment for Democracy was US Government initiated, and although
ostensibly "independent," has been continually funded by the US
Congress, and its Board has included top level actors in the US
Government's foreign policy apparatus, including former Secretaries of
State Henry Kissinger and Madeleine Albright, former National Security
Council Chair Zbigniew Brzezinski, and former World Bank President Paul
Wolfowitz.
* CBS News, September 9, 2006: Senator Jay Rockefeller says the world
would be
better off today if the United States had never invaded Iraq. Does
Rockefeller stand by his view, even if it means that Saddam Hussein
could still be in power if the United States didn't invade? "Yes. Yes."
says Rockefeller. "He wasn't going to attack us."
* William Appleman Williams, in his 2007 book "Empire as a way of
life": Analyzing US
history from its revolutionary origins to the dawn of the Reagan era,
Williams shows how America has always been addicted to empire in its
foreign and domestic ideology. Detailing the imperial actions and
beliefs of revered figures such as Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson,
Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, this book is the most
in-depth historical study of the American obsession with empire, and is
essential to understanding the origins of our current foreign and
domestic undertakings.
* Compare
Washington's reaction in recent years to popular uprisings alleging
electoral fraud in the Ukraine and Georgia to its reaction to the same
in Mexico in 2006 when the rightwing Felipe Calderon was declared the
winner in a very questionable manner.
* Venezuelan
President Hugo Chávez, in his talk at the United Nations, September 20,
2006, sharply criticized US president George W. Bush's foreign policies
and Bush himself. Britain's Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett suggested that
the Chávez comments were beyond the pale of diplomatic protocol at the UN.
"Even the Democrats wouldn't say that". However, the Guardian reported that
"Delegates and leaders from around the world streamed
back into the chamber to hear Mr Chávez, and when he stepped down the
vigorous applause lasted so long that it had to be curtailed by the
chair."
* Only the imperialist powers have the ability to enforce sanctions and
are therefore always exempt from them.
William Blum is the author of:
* Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions Since World War 2
* Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower
* West-Bloc Dissident: A Cold War Memoir
* Freeing the World to Death: Essays on the American Empire
Portions of the books can be read, and signed copies purchased, at
www.killinghope.org
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article29292.htm
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
