What caused the financial crisis? The Big Lie goes viral.

      By Barry Ritholtz
      
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/barry-ritholtz/2011/03/31/AFWBwIBC_page.html>,
      Published: November 5


      
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/what-caused-the-financial-crisis-the-big-lie-goes-viral/2011/10/31/gIQAXlSOqM_story.html


I have a fairly simple approach to investing: Start with data and 
objective evidence to determine the dominant elements driving the market 
action right now. Figure out what objective reality is beneath all of 
the noise. Use that information to try to make intelligent investing 
decisions.

But then, I'm an investor focused on preserving capital and managing 
risk. I'm not out to win the next election 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/campaigns> or drive the debate. 
For those who are, facts and data matter much less than a narrative that 
supports their interests.

One group has been especially vocal about shaping a new narrative of the 
credit crisis and economic collapse: those whose bad judgment and failed 
philosophy helped cause the crisis.

Rather than admit the error of their ways --- Repent! --- these people 
are engaged in an active campaign to rewrite history. They are not, of 
course, exonerated in doing so. And beyond that, they damage the process 
of repairing what was broken. They muddy the waters when it comes to 
holding guilty parties responsible. They prevent measures from being put 
into place to prevent another crisis.

Here is the surprising takeaway: They are winning. Thanks to the endless 
repetition of the Big Lie.

A Big Lie is so colossal that no one would believe that someone could 
have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. There are many 
examples: Claims that Earth is not warming, or that evolution is not the 
best thesis we have for how humans developed. Those opposed to stimulus 
spending have gone so far as to claim that the infrastructure of the 
United States is just fine, Grade A (not D, as the we discussed last 
month), and needs little repair.

Wall Street has its own version: Its Big Lie is that banks and 
investment houses are merely victims of the crash 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/risk/index.html>. You 
see, the entire boom and bust was caused by misguided government 
policies. It was not irresponsible lending or derivative or excess 
leverage or misguided compensation packages, but rather long-standing 
housing policies that were at fault.

Indeed, the arguments these folks make fail to withstand even casual 
scrutiny. But that has not stopped people who should know better from 
repeating them.

The Big Lie made a surprise appearance Tuesday when New York Mayor 
Michael Bloomberg, responding to a question about Occupy Wall Street 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/occupy-wall-street-hits-dc/2011/10/06/gIQAOe4RRL_gallery.html>,
 
stunned observers by exonerating Wall Street: "It was not the banks that 
created the mortgage crisis. It was, plain and simple, Congress who 
forced everybody to go and give mortgages to people who were on the cusp."

What made his comments so stunning is that he built Bloomberg Data 
Services on the notion that data are what matter most to investors. The 
terminals are found on nearly 400,000 trading desks around the world, at 
a cost of $1,500 a month. (Do the math --- that's over half a billion 
dollars a month.) Perhaps the fact that Wall Street was the source of 
his vast wealth biased him. But the key principle of the business that 
made the mayor a billionaire is that fund managers, economists, 
researchers and traders should ignore the squishy narrative and, 
instead, focus on facts. Yet he ignored his own principles to repeat 
statements he should have known were false.

Why are people trying to rewrite the history of the crisis? Some are 
simply trying to save face. Interest groups who advocate for 
deregulation of the finance sector would prefer that deregulation not 
receive any blame for the crisis.

Some stand to profit from the status quo: Banks present a systemic risk 
to the economy, and reducing that risk by lowering their leverage and 
increasing capital requirements also lowers profitability. Others are 
hired guns, doing the bidding of bosses on Wall Street.

__ 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/the-dows-5-best-and-worst-days/2011/09/09/gIQAoE5yMK_gallery.html>
 





They all suffer cognitive dissonance --- the intellectual crisis that 
occurs when a failed belief system or philosophy is confronted with 
proof of its implausibility.

And what about those facts? To be clear, no single issue was the cause. 
Our economy is a complex and intricate system. What caused the crisis? Look:

?Fed Chair Alan Greenspan dropped rates to 1 percent --- levels not seen 
for half a century --- and kept them there for an unprecedentedly long 
period. This caused a spiral in anything priced in dollars (i.e., oil, 
gold) or credit (i.e., housing) or liquidity driven (i.e., stocks).

?Low rates meant asset managers could no longer get decent yields from 
municipal bonds or Treasurys. Instead, they turned to high-yield 
mortgage-backed securities. Nearly all of them failed to do adequate due 
diligence before buying them, did not understand these instruments or 
the risk involved. They violated one of the most important rules of 
investing: Know what you own.

?Fund managers made this error because they relied on the credit ratings 
agencies --- Moody's, S&P and Fitch. They had placed an AAA rating on 
these junk securities, claiming they were as safe as U.S. Treasurys.

. Derivatives had become a uniquely unregulated financial instrument 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/14/AR2008101403343.html>.
 
They are exempt from all oversight, counter-party disclosure, exchange 
listing requirements, state insurance supervision and, most important, 
reserve requirements. This allowed AIG to write $3 trillion in 
derivatives while reserving precisely zero dollars against future claims.

. The Securities and Exchange Commission changed the leverage rules for 
just five Wall Street banks in 2004. The "Bear Stearns exemption" 
replaced the 1977 net capitalization rule's 12-to-1 leverage limit. In 
its place, it allowed unlimited leverage for Goldman Sachs, Morgan 
Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns. These banks 
ramped leverage to 20-, 30-, even 40-to-1. Extreme leverage leaves very 
little room for error.

.Wall Street's compensation system was skewed toward short-term 
performance. It gives traders lots of upside and none of the downside. 
This creates incentives to take excessive risks.

. The demand for higher-yielding paper led Wall Street to begin bundling 
mortgages 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/15/AR2008121503561.html>.
 
The highest yielding were subprime mortgages. This market was dominated 
by non-bank originators exempt from most regulations. The Fed could have 
supervised them, but Greenspan did not.

. These mortgage originators' lend-to-sell-to-securitizers model had 
them holding mortgages for a very short period. This allowed them to get 
creative with underwriting standards, abdicating traditional lending 
metrics such as income, credit rating, debt-service history and 
loan-to-value.

. "Innovative" mortgage products were developed to reach more subprime 
borrowers. These include 2/28 adjustable-rate mortgages, interest-only 
loans, piggy-bank mortgages (simultaneous underlying mortgage and 
home-equity lines) and the notorious negative amortization loans 
(borrower's indebtedness goes up each month). These mortgages defaulted 
in vastly disproportionate numbers to traditional 30-year fixed mortgages.

?To keep up with these newfangled originators, traditional banks 
developed automated underwriting systems. The software was gamed by 
employees paid on loan volume, not quality.

?Glass-Steagall legislation, which kept Wall Street and Main Street 
banks walled off from each other, was repealed in 1998. This allowed 
FDIC-insured banks, whose deposits were guaranteed by the government, to 
engage in highly risky business. It also allowed the banks to bulk up, 
becoming bigger, more complex and unwieldy.

?Many states had anti-predatory lending laws on their books (along with 
lower defaults and foreclosure rates). In 2004, the Office of the 
Comptroller of the Currency federally preempted state laws regulating 
mortgage credit and national banks. Following this change, national 
lenders sold increasingly risky loan products in those states. Shortly 
after, their default and foreclosure rates skyrocketed.

Bloomberg was partially correct: Congress did radically deregulate the 
financial sector, doing away with many of the protections that had 
worked for decades. Congress allowed Wall Street to self-regulate, and 
the Fed the turned a blind eye to bank abuses.

The previous Big Lie --- the discredited belief that free markets 
require no adult supervision --- is the reason people have created a new 
false narrative.

Now it's time for the Big Truth.

-- 
JAI
RAC-LA

https://lists.riseup.net/www/admin/newplanet-newlives

http://revolutionaryautonomouscommunities.blogspot.com/

http://www.pmpress.org/content/article.php?story=JohnAImani



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to