http://www.marxist.com/the-iron-lady-film-review.htm

 The Iron Lady: Film
Review<http://www.marxist.com/the-iron-lady-film-review.htm>
*Written by Rob Sewell Wednesday, 04 January 2012 *
*[image: Print]*<http://www.marxist.com/the-iron-lady-film-review/print.htm#>

*Margaret Thatcher is a hate figure for millions in Britain who suffered
under 13 years of her rule. We, who opposed Thatcherism to the bitter end,
will never forget the mass unemployment, the cuts, wholesale privatisation
and the attacks on the trade unions as well as our democratic rights. Those
who fought back were regarded by Thatcher as “the enemy within,” a term she
used against the National Union of Mineworkers, as they fought for their
communities and their jobs. Thatcher represented capitalism ‘red in tooth
and claw’ and we will not forget it.*

*[image: Meryl Streep as Margaret
Thatcher]*<http://www.marxist.com/images/stories/britain/Thatcher%20Iron%20lady%20meryl%20streep.jpg>
*Meryl Streep as Margaret Thatcher**This January, a new film about the life
of Margaret Thatcher is in cinemas, called The Iron Lady. It stars Meryl
Streep as Thatcher and is a blatant attempt to rehabilitate Thatcher and
her role in British history. The film is in the same sickly-sweet genre as
The Queen and The King's Speech.*


*Despite claims to the contrary, The Iron Lady is a whitewash job in an
attempt to prettify Thatcher and her government that waged class war
against ordinary working people. The producer, Damian Jones, tried to
excuse its role with the sugary words, “Whatever one's politics, you can't
deny Margaret Thatcher had a profound effect on this country.” He goes on
to say that “Thatcher is iconic.” Such is the “objective” view of those who
produced this insult, which according to Charles Moore in the Daily
Telegraph, is the “most powerful piece of propaganda for conservatism.”*
Con

*[image: Margaret Thatcher
1983]*<http://www.marxist.com/images/stories/britain/Margaret_Thatcher_1983.jpg>
*Margaret Thatcher 1983**The Sun called it “a true story of feminism in
action.” This feminist line about Thatcher representing the interests of
women is totally laughable, or truly disgusting. Ordinary working class
women hated the woman and what she represented. The fact that she was a
woman never came into it. But gullible Meryl Streep fell hook, line and
sinker for this feminist argument when she said “I admire her achievement.
I stand in awe of it, even while not agreeing with a lot of the policies.
The fact that she got things done, even though many people didn't like her,
was extraordinary.” “People were thrilled that she became prime minister in
the UK.”
Does Streep understand Thatcher’s “achievement” in ruthlessly representing
the interests of big business? Obviously not. She seems oblivious to the
fact that many lives were ruined and destroyed by this individual,
especially in the industrial areas of Britain. She is oblivious to the
destruction of families in the mining communities during the miners' strike
of 1984-5. Or the fact that she privatised everything in sight and presided
over nearly 4 million unemployed. Instead, Thatcher is glorified for her
“courageous” stand by the film, while the miners' strike and poll tax is
cast into the sidelines. Images of police horses ploughing into unruly
miners are shown, while union leaders and protesters are portrayed as a
wild rabble, intent on banging on her car window. All are props with which
to prove how tough the Iron Lady was.*

*“You have that decade where she did everything. She stood up against the
miners, against the IRA, she led us to war...” writes Abi Morgan, the
screenwriter, keen to equate the NUM with individual terrorism.*
Whitewash

*Liz Hoggard in the Evening Standard, who describes herself as a “lefty
feminist,” falls over herself by saying “the ladies are for turning: how
Maggie seduced Meryl – and reduced me to tears.” The film is an attempt to
“humanise” Thatcher, but you cannot wash away the blood. “The real danger
for the lefties is that Streep's performance is so touching,” says Hoggard.*

*Phyllida Lloyd, the director, says “She [Thatcher] was a superstar. We
wanted to treat her with dignity.” But Thatcher was no superstar, except
for the Thatcherite backwoodsmen, the hang 'em, flog 'em brigade. This film
is nothing more than a whitewash job, an attempt to glorify a reactionary
woman that personified the short-sighted, get-rich-quick morality of
capitalism in its decline. Throughout her life she was a virile champion of
inequality and privilege. She was in favour of everything reactionary,
including Victorian values. True to her class, she stole from the poor and
gave to the rich. As regards “dignity”, maybe we should ask about the
dignity of the communities that suffered at her hands without any mercy?*

*“There is no such thing as society”, stated Thatcher. This reflects the
individualism and egotism of capitalism, a philosophy promoted by Thatcher
and her class.*

*For those of us who lived through the Thatcher years, such crude
propaganda will simply make us more angry. The first act of David Cameron
as prime minister was to bring Thatcher to Downing Street. This government
of millionaires represents the heirs of Thatcher. We will fight them as we
fought Thatcher. The real heroines are the Real Iron Ladies, such as Women
Against Pit Closures, who represent our class, the millions of ordinary
working class women who are now resisting the attacks from this ConDem
Coalition.*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to