https://nacla.org/blog/2012/5/14/cnns-latest-outlet-roger-noriegas-paranoid-speculations
Home <https://nacla.org/> » Blogs <https://nacla.org/blog> » KeaneBhatt's blog <https://nacla.org/blogs/keanebhatt> » CNN: The Latest Outlet for Roger Noriegas Paranoid Speculations CNN: The Latest Outlet for Roger Noriegas Paranoid Speculations Keane Bhatt <https://nacla.org/nacla-bloggers#Keane> Manufacturing Contempt <https://nacla.org/node/8088> May 14, 2012 [image: Printer-friendly version] <https://nacla.org/print/8131>[image: Send to friend] <https://nacla.org/printmail/8131> On May 2, CNN executive producer Arthur Brice published<http://edition.cnn.com/2012/05/01/world/americas/venezuela-chavez-succession/index.html>what was purported to be a news article on Venezuela. Instead, Brices 4,300-word screed, titled Chavez Health Problems Plunge Venezuelas Future Into Doubt, is little more than a platform for the bizarre theories of Roger Noriega, an ultra-rightwing lobbyist and one-time diplomat under George W. Bush, who Brice references over two dozen times throughout his article. As a political commentator, Noriega pontificates with total brazenness. He appeared as the chief pundit in Brices CNN piece six months after concluding <http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/11/08/hugo-chavezs-big-lie/>based on what he said was the belief of Chávezs own medical teamthat the Venezuelan president was "not likely to survive more than six months. Noriega is not fazed by facts. He promotes his fantastical claims in many major news outlets, often based on anonymous sources. Take, for example, his 2010 *Foreign Policy* article, Chávez's Secret Nuclear Program<http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/10/05/chavez_s_secret_nuclear_program?page=full>, whose subtitle reads: Its not clear what Venezuela's hiding, but it's definitely hiding somethingand the fact that Iran is involved suggests that its up to no good. (State Department officials dismissed this suspicion with scorn<http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/211548> .) CNNs interviews with Noriega and the other mostly rightwing analysts likely led to this demonstrably false claim at the beginning of Brice's May 2 article: Diosdado Cabello, a longtime Chavez cohort . . . amassed tremendous power in January when Chavez named him president of the National Assembly. In fact, even *El Universal*, a daily Venezuelan newspaper long-aligned with the opposition, conceded<http://www.eluniversal.com/nacional-y-politica/120105/diosdado-cabello-is-the-new-president-of-the-national-assembly>in a January 5 report that Cabello was *elected *as the new president of the National Assembly, even if only with the votes of the majority United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV). Ewan Robertson of Venezuelanalysis.com found<http://venezuelanalysis.com/news/6728>that 98 deputies of the pro-government bloc supported Cabello, while the 67-member opposition bloc opposed him. Such mundane electoral processes have guided much of Venezuelas political dynamics over the past decade. The rest of CNNs long-winded compilation of hearsay proceeds in the same way. To give two examples, Brice refers to Venezuelan doctor Jose Rafael Marquina to shed light on Chávezs current state of health. By Brices own admission however, Marquina practices in Florida and has no direct connection with the case but says he has colleagues who know what is happening. On the separate issue of Venezuelan politics, the Cubans, Brice writes, may only have the power to suggest and manipulate as best they can, but he also cites some observers who fear the Cubans could leverage their perceived point men in the country to unleash militias in an attempt to take over. Brice then quotes Noriega as saying, I have no doubts that some Cubans would use violent means to deal with Venezuelans. These examples are indicative of CNN's desire to spin a yarn of intrigue. Venezuelas October presidential vote should be no different from the past. Closely monitored, free and fair elections<http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3009>have been the final word in political outcomes in Venezuela. But by relying on telephone interviews with self-proclaimed analysts almost exclusively based in the United States, CNN portrays Venezuelan politics as a grand chess game of powerful men trying to bend the arc of history because they believe their president's life may be slipping out of the hands of doctors and into the hands of God. For CNN, Venezuelan voters play a marginal role, if any at allits a sensationalized struggle between drug-dealing generals, Cuban spooks, well-connected cronies, armed militias, and a dying, charismatic strongman in thrall to Fidel Castro. Had Brice decided to report on the ground from Caracas, he may have produced a video segment<http://cnn.com/video/?/video/world/2012/04/27/newton-venezuela-chavez-cancer-mystery.cnn>similar to the one that appears alongside his own article<http://edition.cnn.com/2012/05/01/world/americas/venezuela-chavez-succession/index.html>on CNNs website. Journalist Paula Newton describes the free, government-provided medical attention in poor areasa concrete reason why broad support for Chavez isnt exactly blind, she says. Newton also shows Chávez voters displaying (reasonable) skepticism toward conjectures that the president is about to die or is already deada potentially valuable lesson for CNN, considering Brice's general credulousness. * [image: 962] Roger Noriega (interamericansecuritywatch.com) Noriegas buffoonish commentary in outlets like CNN would be more amusing if not for his hands-on experience in crafting devastating U.S. policies toward Latin America. Noriegas career in government, one may recall, includes administering non-lethal aid<http://www.drclas.harvard.edu/revista/articles/view/865>to the Nicaraguan Contra insurgency as a U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) official in the 1980s. He followed this up as a senior staffer to Senator Jesse Helms in the 1990s, co-authoring<http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/2010/04/roger_noriegas/>the Helms-Burton Act, which intensified the U.S. embargo on Cuba. Bush II appointed him as ambassador to the Organization of American States in 2001, and in 2003, he replaced Iran-Contra<http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB40/> veteran <http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2446> and Venezuelan coup-backer<http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/17/world/us-cautioned-leader-of-plot-against-chavez.html?ref=ottojreich&pagewanted=all>Otto Reich as Bushs Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs. For this posthis last in government before switching over to the private sectorNoriega had big shoes to fill, and he undoubtedly rose to the occasion. Whereas Reich failed to roll back the leftward tide of Venezuela in 2002 during his tenure (the military coup<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_Venezuelan_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat_attempt>which overthrew Hugo Chávez lasted only two days), Noriega triumphed in damming the populist flood<http://books.google.com/books/about/Damming_the_Flood.html?id=ikxwRQAACAAJ>of Lavalas in Haiti. As the only mass-based political movement in the most unequal country in the hemisphere, Lavalas, headed<http://aristidefoundationfordemocracy.org/about/one-step-at-a-time-an-interview-with-jean-bertrand-aristide/>by the democratically elected president Jean-Bertrand Aristide, was an obvious threat to the Bush administration. The denouement<http://articles.latimes.com/2004/mar/04/opinion/oe-sachs4>of the administrations destabilization <http://newleftreview.org/?view=2507> campaign<http://maxblumenthal.com/2010/01/how-washingtons-plot-against-haiti-worsened-the-disaster/>occurred in February 2004 when Aristide and his family were spirited away by a U.S. plane in the middle of the night. Noriega initially denied<http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aggORL3TN0NI&refer=top_world_news> that the United States played a role in Aristides removal, feebly claiming that Aristide had embarked on the plane by his own volition. But according to Dr. Paul FarmerHarvard health specialist and UN Deputy Special Envoy for HaitiNoriega admitted<http://www.lrb.co.uk/v26/n08/paul-farmer/who-removed-aristide>during a House hearing that Aristide did not know of his destination until less than an hour before landing in the Central African Republic. Robert White, a former U.S. ambassador to El Salvador and Paraguay, told *Newsday*right before the coup that Roger Noriega has been dedicated to ousting Aristide for many, many years, and now hes in a singularly powerful position to accomplish it. Today, Noriega divides his time between his post as a Latin America scholar at the pro-corporate American Enterprise Institute (AEI) think tank, and as a registered lobbyist<http://soprweb.senate.gov/index.cfm?event=getFilingDetails&filingID=243256D8-5536-4DF9-A75B-5ED5AD4A8857>for various interests in countries that are the subjects of his widely published commentaries. Noriegas influence-peddling has been extremely effective in recent years. For example, in addition to writing opinion pieces<http://www.forbes.com/2009/07/06/honduras-manuel-zelaya-opinions-contributors-roger-noriega.html>defending the 2009 Honduran coup detat, Noriegawho was hired<http://www.democracynow.org/2009/8/3/headlines/roger_noriega_hired_as_lobbyist_by_honduran_business_coalition>to represent <http://narcosphere.narconews.com/userfiles/70/NoriegaReg.pdf> a Honduran textile manufacturers grouporganized a meeting<http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/08/world/americas/08honduras.html>between the coup regimes supporters and U.S. Senators less than 10 days after the overthrow of President Manuel Zelaya. Daniel W. Fisk, who helped set U.S. policies in Central America as a high-ranking government official in the 1980s and 90s, attended the meeting. According to *The New York Times*, Fisk was stunned by the turnout. I had never seen eight senators in one room to talk about Latin America in my entire career, he was quoted as saying. *The Times* framed Noriegas actions toward Honduras as a vestige of Cold War planning. Noriega, Reich, and Fisk, wrote *The Times*, viewed Honduras as the principal battleground in a proxy fight with Cuba and Venezuela, two countries that the three men characterized as threats to stability in the region." * Given Noriegas disturbing record, it is astonishing that CNN produced a news piece on Venezuela through the lens of a lobbyist with obvious conflicts of interest in Latin America; a man who supported the overthrow of the democratically-elected president of Honduras largely to undermine<http://www.forbes.com/2009/07/06/honduras-manuel-zelaya-opinions-contributors-roger-noriega.html> Chávezs perceived influence in Central America. Brices article, which never mentions Noriegas lobbying, is dominated by comments like these: *Noriega and other observers have said [Chávezs] appointments of Cabello and Rangel Silva have turned Venezuela into a narcostate. . . . 'If Cabello and Rangel Silva resort to dirty work to hold things together, Maduro is a guy they can bring in to give a veneer of respectability to the international community,' Noriega said, calling [the hypothetical scenario he just created] a 'junta kind of arrangement.' . . . The military also would face deep divisions if called upon to fire on Venezuelan citizens. . . . "The elections are, from [Cabello and Rangel Silvas] standpoint, expendable," [Noriega] said. "On the other hand, if they believe they can add a patina of legitimacy, they will hold them. They're going to be hard-pressed to make a legitimacy argument with a narco kingpin in power."* Through CNN, Noriega is able to publicly fret over the prospects of a Venezuelan military coup (like the one the Bush administration and the IMF supported <http://southoftheborderdoc.com/2002-venezuela-coup/> in 2002) and criticize Venezuela's purported drug trafficking (like the kind carried out<http://www.nytimes.com/1986/06/12/world/panama-strongman-said-to-trade-in-drugs-arms-and-illicit-money.html>by CIA asset<http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1933053_1933052_1933051,00.html>Manuel Noriega and the U.S.-backed Contras <http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB2/nsaebb2.htm#1>). Noriega preemptively disapproves of a hypothetical Venezuelan election whose purpose, he says, would be to add a patina of legitimacy (despite Noriegas own endorsement<http://blog.american.com/2009/11/democracy-trumps-chavismo-in-latin-america/>of the U.S.-backed sham <http://www.thenation.com/article/sham-elections-honduras> elections<http://www.thenation.com/article/sham-elections-honduras>in Honduras in 2009, which were conducted under a military dictatorship <http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/5245/banana_repugnant>). Noriega can also rely on CNN to unquestioningly publish his aspersions of drug-running against the Venezuelan government. Brices article is full of terms like narcogenerals, narcostate, narcoterrorism, and narco kingpin, many of which originate from Noriegas direct quotes to CNN. This is just the latest example of media manipulation that Noriegas colleagues mastered long ago. From 1983-86 Reich masterminded a taxpayer-funded propaganda outlet, the Office of Public Diplomacy<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Public_Diplomacy>, which, among other activities, placed<http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2002/10/14/021014fa_fact1?currentPage=all>false reports in major outlets that the Sandinista government in Nicaragua was involved in narcotrafficking. Haiti is another case: In 1992, the CIA created <http://www.lrb.co.uk/v34/n05/pooja-bhatia/diary> a dubious psychological profile on Aristide, which Senator Jesse Helms then used to denounce the president as a psychopath<http://www.lrb.co.uk/v26/n08/paul-farmer/who-removed-aristide>, a claim that was uncritically parroted<http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1993-10-21/news/1993294025_1_aristide-haiti-democracy>by the press at the time. Aristide was also the subject of a U.S. grand jury investigation due to his alleged involvement in narcotrafficking. Although the media repeated the claim that Aristide's was running drugs, human-rights attorney Brian Concannon pointed out<http://upsidedownworld.org/main/haiti-archives-51/375-haiti-the-return>in 2006 that ultimately, not a single charge [was] issued from the courthouse. (U.S. efforts to assassinate Aristides character through the courts continue up to the present day<http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/mar/13/america-subversion-haiti-democracy> .) * But there is a silver lining to Brices CNN article: Roger Noreigas nuttier theories, thankfully, were not incorporated into the piece. Here are just a few short excerpts of Noriegas baseless scholarly output as of late: - In a March 2011 article<http://american.com/archive/2011/march/u-s-diplomats-clueless-on-alleged-chavez-plot-to-kill-the-president-of-panama>for AEI titled, U.S. Diplomats Clueless on Alleged Chávez Plot to Kill the President of Panama, Noriega asked, If Panamanian authorities dismissed this as a hoax, why have senior officials of that government expressed their gratitude to me for revealing the plot months since the incident? And why on earth would Chávez risk an attack on Martinelli? I cannot answer these questions. - In another AEI entry<http://www.aei.org/outlook/foreign-and-defense-policy/regional/latin-america/the-mounting-hezbollah-threat-in-latin-america/>from October 2011, titled The Mounting Hezbollah Threat in Latin America, Noriega contends that Hezbollahs presence in Latin America dates to the mid-1980s, when it began sending operatives into the notoriously lawless region known as the tri-border area . . . Their activity also includes pirating software and music. - In the March 2011* Washington Post* op-ed Is There a Chavez Terror Network on Americas Doorstep?<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/is-there-a-chavez-terror-network-on-americas-doorstep/2011/03/18/ABauYU3_story.html> Noriega is able to find both al-Qaeda and Iranian operations in Venezuela: The threat posed by globe-trotting terrorists is ever-present," he writes. "A U.S. security official told me in mid-January that two known al-Qaeda operatives were in Caracas planning a 'chemical' attack on the U.S. embassy . . . A Venezuelan government source has told me that two Iranian terrorist trainers are on Venezuelas Margarita Island instructing operatives who have assembled from around the region. In addition, radical Muslims from Venezuela and Colombia are brought to a cultural center in Caracas named for the Ayatollah Khomeini and Simon Bolivar for spiritual training. - In Noriegas April 2010 ultimatum in *The Wall Street Journal*, Time to Confront the Tehran-Caracas Axis<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304017404575166293156975692.html>, he uncovers yet another sinister plot: [T]he Canadian uranium exploration company U308 Corp has recorded a substantial source of uranium in the Roraima Basin, which straddles the border between Guyana and the Venezuelan province of Bolívar. Iranian or other Middle Eastern individuals operate a tractor factory, cement plant and gold mine in this region. Noriega concludes this *WSJ* op-ed by appealing to international law. He writes that Venezuela's nefarious plans should be challenged as a threat to peace and an act of aggression under Chapter 7 of the United Nations Charter. This is a perfectly appropriate way to deal with any rogue state that, in Noriegas words, is prone to meddle in the internal politics<http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/19/hugo-chavez-colombia-us-treaty-opinions-contributors-venezuela.html> of other countries, and provides support for terrorist groups in the Americas<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304017404575166293156975692.html>. Unfortunately, Noriega has it upside down. It is not Venezuela, but the United States that is unequivocally responsible for doing<http://www.thenation.com/article/157510/former-cia-asset-luis-posada-goes-trial> both <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/28/us/28bosch.html> kinds<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis-Jodel_Chamblain>of activities<http://empirezone.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/05/23/the-saga-of-toto-constant/>. But don't hold your breath waiting for Noriega to equally apply such standards. ------------------------------ *Keane Bhatt is an activist in Washington, D.C. He has worked in the United States and Latin America on a variety of campaigns related to community development and social justice. His analyses and opinions have appeared in a range of outlets, including NPR, *The Nation*, *The St. Petersburg Times*, CNN En Español, Truthout, and Upside Down World. This is the first post of his NACLA new blog titled Manufacturing Contempt, which takes a critical look at the U.S. press and its portrayal of the hemisphere.* [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
