http://www.marxist.com/greece-battle-for-a-left-government-eight-weaknesses.htm

 Greece: “The battle for a Left government: eight weaknesses that we ought
to 
correct”<http://www.marxist.com/greece-battle-for-a-left-government-eight-weaknesses.htm>

Written by the Editorial Board of the newspaper ‘Epanastasi’ and of the
magazine ‘Marxistiki Foni’ Tuesday, 29 May 2012 16:27

<http://www.marxist.com/greece-battle-for-a-left-government-eight-weaknesses/print.htm><http://www.marxist.com/component/option,com_mailto/link,aHR0cDovL3d3dy5tYXJ4aXN0LmNvbS9ncmVlY2UtYmF0dGxlLWZvci1hLWxlZnQtZ292ZXJubWVudC1laWdodC13ZWFrbmVzc2VzLmh0bQ%3D%3D/tmpl,component/>

[image: Greece: “The battle for a Left government: eight weaknesses that we
ought to correct”. Photo: Asteris Masouras]*The ruling class is scaling up
its dirty war against SYRIZA, and is drawing together its various political
fractions in the hope of preventing a potential electoral victory of SYRIZA
in the elections on June 17. From the point of view of SYRIZA, in order to
achieve our aim of a Left government, we need to correct eight grave errors
and weaknesses.*

[image: Tsipras at election rally. Photo: Asteris
Masouras]<http://www.marxist.com/images/stories/greece/Tsipras_2012_election_rally-Asteris_Masouras.jpg>Tsipras
at election rally. Photo: Asteris
Masouras<http://www.flickr.com/photos/asterios/>1)
Our election campaign ought to not centre solely on the bourgeois media,
which is inevitably hostile to SYRIZA. Rather, it should chiefly focus on
neighbourhoods and the workplaces, where it is necessary to fight a daily
battle by discussing, convincing, mobilising, and organising the most
militant of workers and of the youth. SYRIZA, as a unified party of the
masses, must begin to self-organise as early as possible during this
critical political face-off.

SYRIZAs initiative for popular assemblies is correct; these assemblies,
however, ought to not only happen in each neighbourhood, but also to spread
to every workplace. They ought to not be limited to consultative
assemblies, or be held purely for the purposes of making electoral
speeches. They ought to recruit members for SYRIZA and decide by popular
vote on what ought to be the priorities for SYRIZA’s political programme
and organisation in light of the elections ahead, and they ought to elect
local committees responsible for guiding and coordinating the struggle
locally.

2) The lack of a cohesive political programme is clear. Not only does this
open up space for improvisations and confused oscillations on the part of
our leading members in media appearances, it also fails to provide a
cohesive response to real eventualities such as a declaration of an
extensive economic and political war on the part of capital – domestic and
global alike – against a Left government.

The leading bodies of SYRIZA ought to immediately compose and submit a
political programme for a Left government. This programme needs to be
discussed at the popular assemblies that ought to be taking place at every
neighbourhood and workplace within the next fortnight. The assemblies, in
turn, ought to be electing representatives to attend a specially
constituted conference exclusively charged with deciding on what ought to
be the political programme of a Left government. We – Marxists who are
fighting inside SYNASPISMOS and its youth organisation – will in due course
be presenting our proposals – our contributions to a discussion on a
cohesive political programme of action for the first 100 days of a Left
government.

3) More specifically, it’s an unpleasant surprise to note the lack of any
cohesive and clear positions of SYRIZA in relation to unemployment, and,
more specifically, to note the total abandonment of our historical position
in relation to the 35-hour working week. Unemployment is currently the most
crucial issue for the working class. We owe a radical political solution to
the hundreds of thousands of unemployed that are increasingly pushed
towards hunger and destitution. Such a solution can only be established by
the reduction of the working week to whatever level necessary and placing
every unemployed person in work with a decent salary (sliding scale of work
hours).

To put forward a sliding scale of work hours would reveal to society at
large the inability of capitalism to secure a livelihood for, and therefore
the survival of, hundreds of thousands of people. It would illustrate what
a planned economy could achieve, if it replaced the anarchic and inhumane
capitalist market economy. It is also necessary to draft a plan of
beneficial public works that are to be funded by heavy taxation of sizeable
capital and property, drastic cuts of the military budget, drastic
reduction of the salaries of thousands of state office-holders and
high-functionaries to the level of the average salary of a skilled worker,
the socialisation of church property, the national infrastructure, natural
resources, energy, transport, telecommunications, and of the most important
companies in each sector of the economy.

4) The leadership of SYRIZA is blatantly backtracking on the question of
the banking sector. Over the last two years, SYRIZA have publicly argued
for the nationalisation of the banks. That had given hope to workers that a
Left government would set up a nation-wide unitary credit system, one
capable of cleaning up the interest-laden debts, which flow from the
profit-seeking function and nature of the current banking system, and of
take a central role in the economic and social development of the country.
At the moment, however, according to recent statements by G. Draghassakis,
the nationalisation of the banking system has changed to “public control”
notably through the re-capitalisation with public funds of the banking
sector as per the strictures of the PSI (Private Sector Involvement
programme). That sort of “public control”, with capital loaned by the
Troika, is incompatible with the rejecting the Memorandum. It is
inconceivable that the Troika would fund banks if a Left government
attempted to use its “control” over them to develop society and economy.
Above all, there is nothing “public” about such type of “public control”,
given that banks will continue to function as profit-maximising commercial
entities whose governance would be exercised most probably by state
officials of the highest level who would be answerable to shareholders
rather than to workers and to society at large.

5) Our public announcements are weak and lack courage in relation to the
issue of combating fat-cat tax-evasion, which we, correctly, present as
important in order for a Left government to be able to secure a decent
livelihood for workers and pensioners. Tax evasion, along with other
instances of fraud by capital, can not be thwarted by invoking our
“political determination and intention”, or by attempting to make the
utterly corrupt mechanisms of the bourgeois state function properly. A Left
government ought to immediately institutionalise workers’ control.

>From this point onwards, in every large-scale enterprise, meticulous
administrative checks and controls ought to be taking place by elected
committees. These committees should involve workers aided by specialists
committed to a Left government. Only in this manner would the scandals and
fraud committed by capital be fully exposed. Everyone would be able to see
how the Greek economy at large has historically been robbed by capital.

6) The bourgeoisie, be they neoliberals or whatever, hypocritically refer
to or appear to deal with the “state” as were it not constructed in their
own image. They pretend that it was not set up to pursue their class
interests, but that it was set up and is defended by the Left. Correctly,
SYRIZA figures have so far kept their distance from ‘Statism’, in the sense
that the Left cannot be defending a wasteful, bureaucratic, and autocratic
bourgeois state. However, what we ought to be adding is that we do not
simply defend a less costly or more efficient state, but a state that would
be democratically controlled by workers for the people, a state without
bureaucracy, privileges, and autocracy.

We must publicly support positions such as the remuneration of all state
office-holders with a salary equivalent to that of a skilled worker; the
scrapping of the existing structures of the army and of the security
forces, and their re-institution under the control of the mass institutions
and organisations of the working people. We need to put forward a new
Constitution that entrenches societal ownership of the commanding heights
of the economy, and that establishes a true democracy buttressed by the
active participation of workers in the exercising of power and in
decision-making. This democracy would replace the autocratic and corrupt
political system which allows the people to part-take in shaping its
destiny only one day every four years.

7) The frequently awkward and apologetic stance of SYRIZA figures on the
issue of the EU and the Euro is problematic. At every opportunity, we must
emphasise that we defend a Europe of the working people against a Europe of
banks and capitalism. We should support the proposition that the euro – as
a symbol of European unification on a capitalist basis – is threatened not
by the Left, but by the crisis and contradictions of capitalism.

Let us clearly state that the wellbeing of the peoples of Europe isn’t a
monetary matter, but a matter of the mode of production. It is a matter
that requires us to defend another, radically different, socialist European
Union, against the existing reactionary capitalist EU, which, experience
has shown us, is a coalition to combat workers’ interests and rights. On
that basis, we must address a constant appeal to European workers to fight
with us for this other, radically different, socialist Europe. A Europe
that ought to institutionalise new European conventions capable of
guaranteeing, not just a common currency, but also common planning of the
productive forces for the mutual benefit of the European peoples at large.

8) Generally, socialist perspectives are, sadly, non-existent in our
political narrative. As the SYRIZA president correctly stressed in the
‘Guardian’, there is currently “‘a war between the peoples and capitalism,
and Greece is on the frontline of that war!” However, the predominant
narrative of our leading figures, objectively, has taken the appearance of
that of Left-Keynesians. They defend the “social state” at a time when
capitalism makes loud noises about how this is incompatible with capitalism
– instead of opposing capitalism itself. Their political narrative is a
hotchpot of seemingly socially-minded policies which are unlikely to seek
to overcome the constraints of capitalism, or, at best, it is not clear
when they would attempt to overcome these constraints.

It is surely a grave error to argue that it is possible to build socialism
within the territorial limits of Greece, for, as history has shown,
socialism – as a system of social and economic harmony and wellbeing –
cannot be built in one country alone. Due to the highly developed division
of labour internationally, in order to build socialism on a solid basis, it
is necessary to unify the productive forces of developed countries.
However, juxtaposed against the utopia of fully establishing socialism
inside the borders of Greece, it is currently far from impossible, and if
anything totally necessary, to overthrow the capitalist system in Greece.

Capitalism currently finds itself in a profound historical crisis. It is
not possible for it to exist without Memoranda and hordes of poor and
unemployed. The only feasible avenue for social progress is the setting up
over the coming years of a centrally and democratically planned economy, in
which the commanding heights are socialised. Only such an economy would be
capable of securing a decent livelihood for all workers, and it would
provide an example for the setting up of a new, truly socialist society,
across Europe and the globe.

Within the context of its daily struggle for SYRIZA’s electoral victory and
for a Left government, acutely aware of the urgency to correct the
political weakness listed above, the editorial board of the
*Epanastasi*newspaper and of the
*Marxistiki Foni* (www.marxismos.com) magazine, plans to publish over the
coming days its cohesive proposal for a programme of a Left government. *This
proposal will be discussed with comrades and sympathisers at a specially
convened event in Athens, scheduled for 6 June at 18.30 at the ‘ECSTAN’
Cultural Association, 5, Kaftatzoglou Street (close to the overland railway
stop of Aghios Eleftherios).*

Let’s organise to achieve a victorious SYRIZA and Left!

Adopt a cohesive socialist programme capable of shattering Memoranda and
capitalism in Greece, to open up the perspective for a socialist united
Europe.

Source: *Marxist
Voice*<http://www.marxist.com/weblinks/europe/marxistiki-foni.htm>(Greece)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to