An absolutely fantastic version of the video actually slows it down and
applies a color filter. You can actually see the missile. So far, it
doesn't add anything to our narrative that we've posted, but if there is
additional information gleamed from the video we will let you know:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_4d5BOZcXg>


Syria Exclusive: Definitive Evidence of Regime Airstrikes on
Aleppo 
University<http://www.enduringamerica.com/home/2013/1/24/syria-exclusive-definitive-evidence-of-regime-airstrikes-on.html>



 inShare

Thursday, January 24, 2013 at 15:36 | James
Miller<http://www.enduringamerica.com/home/author/james-miller>
 in EA Middle East and
Turkey<http://www.enduringamerica.com/home/category/ea-middle-east-and-turkey>
, Middle East and
Iran<http://www.enduringamerica.com/home/category/middle-east-and-iran>

Video of the airstrike at Aleppo University on January 15th.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=eka1FK_iJIU


*

On Wednesday, we posted an article, Syria Exclusive: Proving the Assad Jet
Fighter's Attack on Aleppo University <http://bit.ly/WlXMXm>, where we
compiled evidence that a regime airstrike was responsible for the 15
January attack that left more than 80 students dead.

Today we have received new information which --- when added to our audio
and video evidence, eyewitness testimony, and expert analysis ---
definitively establishes that a fighter jet was responsible for this
attack. Evidence also suggests that a missile, not a bomb, was used.
*
------------------------------

There is now conclusive evidence that the explosions at Aleppo University
were caused by an airstrike, not a ballistic missile strike and certainly
not a car bomb.

Well-placed Western government officials in the region, with access to
"technical" information about the strike, have told EA that they "can say
with 'certainty' that the missiles were delivered by a jet, flying at
altitude".

The officials were specific that their evidence showed that the explosion
was not from a ballistic missile fired from the ground or a bomb dropped
from the aircraft.

The officials would not divulge the basis for this information, but a
source for EA indicates that Western government have used sophisticated
radar, deployed in Turkey and other countries in the region, as well as
information gathered from classified "listening posts" that monitor signal
interceptions and pilot chatter.

Further analysis of the evidence we have collected matches the assessment
of the officials.

The key factors to consider in determining what weapon was used are the
size of the payload, which can be determined by the size of the explosion,
and the speed of the projectile that hit the target.

We know the speed of the weapon was subsonic (below the speed of sound)
because we can hear the projectile before it passes the camera. The sonic
characteristics also do not match that of a supersonic weapon.

Most rockets possessed by either the regime or the opposition are too small
to do this kind of damage. Larger ballistic missiles, are too fast, their
payloads do not match the explosion, or their size is so great that
evidence of the ballistic missile would be present after the blast.

Several experts have told EA that they think this weapon was a bomb.
However, there are problems with this theory. The jet would have to be
traveling extremely fast, and would have to pull a strong climb and/or turn
after delivering the bomb, remaining out of the frame of the video. Such a
move is not incompatible with the audio evidence, but it is less likely
than other options.

Under the right conditions, a bomb could cause this damage without the
airplane leaving a very loud noise-print at the bombing site. However,
these conditions are rare. While we believe a noise-print of the jet is
audible at the 40 second mark in the video, it is not as loud as that in
most other footage of bombing raids. In contrast, a jet at altitude, firing
an air-to-ground missile, could easily leave this audio signature.

Then there is the "roar" of the bomb. Audio analysis rules out, with a
relatively high degree of certainty, that this roar is created by the plane
delivering the strike. Several experts, however, suggest that many of the
large bombs which are suspects could create such a noise due to the extreme
speed and heavy weight of the projectile. We revisited the evidence, and we
believe that the audio does not rule out this option. Because we have been
unable to find a comparison video that closely approximates the specific
circumstances seen in this footage, we have been unable to test this theory.

The initial hypothesis that this was an air-to-ground missile was partially
based on the sound of the incoming projectile. One complaint about this is
that there is no sign of smoke, a signature of a missile. However, it is
possible that the rocket ran out of propulsion fuel right before it entered
the frame. This would indicate that the missile was towards the end of its
range, a possible explanation for why the jet is not seen in the video, and
why the audio of the jet noise is quieter than one might expect.

All of the experts we have consulted agreed, with certainty, that this was
an airstrike. This conclusion matches the eyewitness testimony that we
have, as well as the testimony offered by journalists inside Aleppo. Adding
the evaluations of aviationists, arms specialists, and combat veteranst to
the technical testimony of the well-placed Western government officials, we
conclude that this was an airstrike. We maintain the original hypothesis
that jet-fired missiles were used. And we hold that --- uniquely, so far
--- this video offers proof of a deliberate, targeted and repeated strike
by Syrian forces against civilians in a Government-controlled area. The use
of an air-to-ground missile against this target is also unique, signifying
the importance of the strike to the Assad government.

http://www.enduringamerica.com/home/2013/1/24/syria-exclusive-definitive-evidence-of-regime-airstrikes-on.html


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to