Superheated American City Dealing with 110 Degrees for 33 Days -- Phoenix 
Confronts Apocalyptic Climate Change
Horrific heat, droughts, windstorms, water shortages and forest fires will 
plague nation's 13th largest city.
Photo Credit: Shutterstock.com
March 14, 2013  |   
 
To stay on top of important articles like these, sign up to receive the latest 
updates from TomDispatch.com here.
If cities were stocks, you’d want to short Phoenix.
Of course, it’s an easy city to pick on. The nation’s 13th largest 
metropolitan area (nudging out Detroit) crams 4.3 million people into a 
low bowl in a hot desert, where horrific heat waves and windstorms visit it 
regularly. It snuggles next to the nation’s largest nuclear plant 
and, having exhausted local sources, it depends on an improbable 
infrastructure to suck water from the distant (and dwindling) Colorado 
River.
In Phoenix, you don’t ask: What could go wrong? You ask: What couldn’t?
And that’s the point, really. Phoenix’s multiple vulnerabilities, which are 
plenty daunting taken one by one, have the capacity to magnify one 
another, like compounding illnesses. In this regard, it’s a 
quintessentially modern city, a pyramid of complexities requiring large 
energy inputs to keep the whole apparatus humming. The urban disasters 
of our time -- New Orleans hit by Katrina, New York City swamped by 
Sandy -- may arise from single storms, but the damage they do is the 
result of a chain reaction of failures -- grids going down, levees 
failing, back-up systems not backing up. As you might expect, academics 
have come up with a name for such breakdowns: infrastructure failure 
interdependencies. You wouldn’t want to use it in a poem, but it does catch an 
emerging theme of our 
time.
Phoenix’s pyramid of complexities looks shakier than most 
because it stands squarely in the crosshairs of climate change. The 
area, like much of the rest of the American Southwest, is already hot and dry; 
it’s getting ever 
hotter and drier, and is increasingly battered by powerful storms. Sandy and 
Katrina previewed how coastal cities can expect to fare as seas 
rise and storms strengthen. Phoenix pulls back the curtain on the future of 
inland empires. If you want a taste of the brutal new climate to 
come, the place to look is where that climate is already harsh, and 
growing more so -- the aptly named Valley of the Sun.
In Phoenix, 
it’s the convergence of heat, drought, and violent winds, interacting 
and amplifying each other that you worry about. Generally speaking, in 
contemporary society, nothing that matters happens for just one reason, 
and in Phoenix there are all too many “reasons” primed to collaborate 
and produce big problems, with climate change foremost among them, 
juicing up the heat, the drought, and the wind to ever greater extremes, like 
so many sluggers on steroids. Notably, each of these nemeses, in 
its own way, has the potential to undermine the sine qua non of modern 
urban life, the electrical grid, which in Phoenix merits special 
attention.
If, in summer, the grid there fails on a large scale 
and for a significant period of time, the fallout will make the 
consequences of Superstorm Sandy look mild. Sure, people will hunt madly for 
power outlets to charge their cellphones and struggle to keep their milk fresh, 
but communications and food refrigeration will not top 
their list of priorities. Phoenix is an air-conditioned city. If the 
power goes out, people fry.
In the summer of 2003, a heat wave swept Europe and killed 70,000 people. The 
temperature in London touched 100 degrees Fahrenheit for 
the first time since records had been kept, and in portions of France 
the mercury climbed as high as 104°F. Those temperatures, however, are 
child’s play in Phoenix, where readings commonly exceed 100°F for more than 100 
days a year. In 2011, the city set a new record for days over 110°F: there were 
33 of them, more than a month of spectacularly superheated days ushering in a 
new era.
In Flight From the Sun
It goes without saying that Phoenix’s desert setting is hot by nature, but 
we’ve made it hotter. The city is a masonry world, with asphalt and 
concrete everywhere. The hard, heavy materials of its buildings and 
roads absorb heat efficiently and give it back more slowly than the 
naked land. In a sense, the whole city is really a thermal battery, 
soaking up energy by day and releasing it at night. The result is an 
“urban heat island,” which, in turn, prevents the cool of the desert 
night from providing much relief.
Sixty years ago, when Phoenix 
was just embarking on its career of manic growth, nighttime lows never 
crept above 90°F. Today such temperatures are a commonplace, and the 
vigil has begun for the first night that doesn’t dip below 100°F. 
Studies indicate that Phoenix’s urban-heat-island effect may boost nighttime 
temperatures by as much as 10°F. It’s as though the city has doubled down on 
climate 
change, finding a way to magnify its most unwanted effects even before 
it hits the rest of us full blast.
Predictably, the poor suffer 
most from the heat.  They live in the hottest neighborhoods with the 
least greenery to mitigate the heat-island effect, and they possess the 
least resources for combatting high temperatures.  For most Phoenicians, 
however, none of this is more than an inconvenience as long as the AC 
keeps humming and the utility bill gets paid. When the heat intensifies, they 
learn to scurry from building to car and into the next building, 
essentially holding their breaths. In those cars, the second thing they 
touch after the ignition is the fan control for the AC. The steering 
wheel comes later.
In the blazing brilliance of July and August, 
you venture out undefended to walk or run only in the half-light of dawn or 
dusk. The idea for residents of the Valley of the Sun is to learn to dodge the 
heat, not challenge it.
Heat, however, is a tricky 
adversary. It stresses everything, including electrical equipment. 
Transformers, when they get too hot, can fail. Likewise, thermoelectric 
generating stations, whether fired by coal, gas, or neutrons, become less 
efficient as the mercury soars.  And the great hydroelectric dams of the 
Colorado 
River, including Glen Canyon, which serves greater Phoenix, won’t be 
able to supply the “peaking power” they do now if the reservoirs behind 
them are fatally shrunken by drought, as multiple studies forecast they will 
be. Much of this can be mitigated with upgraded equipment, smart 
grid technologies, and redundant systems.  But then along comes 
the haboob.
A haboob is a dust/sand/windstorm, usually caused by 
the collapse of a thunderstorm cell. The plunging air hits the ground 
and roils outward, picking up debris across the open desert. As the 
Arabic name suggests, such storms are native to arid regions, but -- 
although Phoenix is no stranger to storm-driven dust -- the 
term haboob has only lately entered the local lexicon. It seems to have 
been imported to describe a new class of storms, spectacular in their 
vehemence, which bring visibility to zero and life to a standstill. They 
sandblast cars, close the airport, and occasionally cause the lights -- and AC 
-- to go out. Not to worry, say the two major utilities serving the 
Phoenix metroplex, Arizona Public Service and the Salt River Project. 
And the outages have indeed been brief.  So far.
Before Katrina 
hit, the Army Corps of Engineers was similarly reassuring to the people 
of New Orleans. And until Superstorm Sandy landed, almost no one worried about 
storm surges filling the subway tunnels of New York.
Every 
system, like every city, has its vulnerabilities. Climate change, in 
almost every instance, will worsen them. The beefed-up, juiced-up, 
greenhouse-gassed, overheated weather of the future will give 
us haboobs of a sort we can’t yet imagine, packed with ever greater 
amounts of energy. In all likelihood, the emergence of such storms as a 
feature of Phoenix life results from an overheating environment, abetted by the 
loose sand and dust of abandoned farmland (which dried up when 
water was diverted to the city’s growing subdivisions).
Water, Water, Everywhere (But Not for Long)
In dystopic portraits of Phoenix’s unsustainable future, water -- or rather the 
lack of it -- is usually painted as the agent of collapse. Indeed, the 
metropolitan area, a jumble of 
jurisdictions that includes Scottsdale, Glendale, Tempe, Mesa, Sun City, 
Chandler, and 15 other municipalities, long ago made full use of such 
local rivers as the Salt, Verde, and Gila. Next, people sank wells and 
mined enough groundwater to lower the water table by 400 feet.
Sometimes the land sank, too.  Near some wells it subsided by 10 feet or more. 
All along, everyone knew that the furious extraction of groundwater 
couldn’t last, so they fixed their hopes on a new bonanza called the 
Central Arizona Project (CAP), a river-sized, open-air canal supported 
by an elaborate array of pumps, siphons, and tunnels that would bring 
Colorado River water across the breadth of Arizona to Phoenix and 
Tucson.
The CAP came on line in the early 1990s and today is the 
engine of Arizona’s growth. Unfortunately, in order to win authorization and 
funding to build it, state officials had to make a bargain with the devil, 
which in this case turned out to be California. Arizona’s 
delegation in the House of Representatives was tiny, California’s was 
huge, and its representatives jealously protected their longstanding 
stranglehold on the Colorado River. The concession California forced on 
Arizona was simple: it had to agree that its CAP water rights would take second 
place to California’s claims.
This means one thing: once 
the inevitable day comes when there isn’t enough water to go around, the CAP 
will absorb the shortage down to the last drop before California 
even begins to turn off its faucets.
A raw deal for Arizona? You 
bet, but not exactly the end of the line. Arizona has other “more 
senior” rights to the Colorado, and when the CAP begins to run dry, you 
may be sure that the masters of the CAP will pay whatever is necessary 
to lease those older rights and keep the 330-mile canal flowing. Among 
their targets will be water rights belonging to Indian tribes at the 
western edge of the state along the lower reaches of the river. The cost of 
buying tribal water will drive the rates consumers pay for water in 
Phoenix sky-high, but they’ll pay it because they’ll have to.
Longer term, the Colorado River poses issues that no amount of tribal water 
can resolve. Beset by climate change, overuse, and drought, the river 
and its reservoirs, according to various researchers, may decline to the point 
that water fails to pass Hoover Dam. In that case, the CAP 
would dry up, but so would the Colorado Aqueduct which serves greater 
Los Angeles and San Diego, as well as the All-American Canal, on which 
the factory farms of California’s Imperial and Coachella valleys depend. 
Irrigators and municipalities downstream in Mexico would also go dry. 
If nothing changes in the current order of things, it is expected that 
the possibility of such a debacle could loom in little more than a 
decade.
The preferred solution to this crisis among the water 
mavens of the lower Colorado is augmentation, which means importing more water 
into the Colorado system to boost native supplies. A recently 
discussed grandiose scheme to bail out the Colorado’s users with a 
pipeline from the Mississippi River failed to pass the straight-face 
test and was shot down by then-Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar.
Meanwhile, the obvious expedient of cutting back on water consumption finds 
little support in thirsty California, which will watch the CAP go dry before 
it gets serious about meaningful system-wide conservation.
Burning Uplands
Phoenicians who want to escape water worries, heat waves, and haboobs have 
traditionally sought refuge in the cool green forests of Arizona’s 
uplands, or at least they did until recently. In 2002, the 
Rodeo-Chediski fire consumed 469,000 acres of pine and mixed conifer on 
the Mogollon Rim, not far from Phoenix. It was an ecological holocaust 
that no one expected to see surpassed. Only nine years later, in 2011, 
the Wallow fire picked up the torch, so to speak, and burned across the 
Rim all the way to the New Mexico border and beyond, topping out at 
538,000 charred acres.
Now, nobody thinks such fires are one-off 
flukes. Diligent modeling of forest response to rising temperatures and 
increased moisture stress suggests, in fact, that these two fires were 
harbingers of worse to come. By mid-century, according to a paper by an 
A-team of Southwestern forest ecologists, the “normal” stress on trees will 
equal that of the worst megadroughts in the region’s distant paleo-history, 
when most of the trees in the area simply died.
Compared to Phoenix’s other heat and water woes, the demise of Arizona’s 
forests may seem like a side issue, whose effects would be noticeable mainly in 
the siltation of reservoirs and the destabilization of the watersheds 
on which the city depends. But it could well prove a regional disaster.  
Consider, then, heat, drought, windstorms, and fire as the four 
horsemen of Phoenix’s Apocalypse. As it happens, though, this potential 
apocalypse has a fifth horseman as well.
Rebecca Solnit has written eloquently of the way a sudden catastrophe -- an 
earthquake, hurricane, or tornado -- can dissolve social divisions and cause a 
community to cohere, 
bringing out the best in its citizenry. Drought and heat waves are 
different. You don’t know that they have taken hold until you are 
already in them, and you never know when they will end. The 
unpleasantness eats away at you.  It corrodes your state of mind. You 
have lots of time to meditate on the deficiencies of your neighbors, 
which loom larger the longer the crisis goes on.
Drought divides people, and Phoenix is already a divided place -- notoriously 
so, thanks to the brutal antics of Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio. In Bird 
on Fire: Lessons from the World’s Least Sustainable City, Andrew Ross offers a 
dismal portrait of contemporary Phoenix -- of a 
city threatened by its particular brand of local politics and economic 
domination, shaped by more than the usual quotient of prejudice, greed, 
class insularity, and devotion to raw power.
It is a truism that 
communities that do not pull together fail to surmount their challenges. 
Phoenix’s are as daunting as any faced by an American city in the new 
age of climate change, but its winner-take-all politics (out of which 
has come Arizona’s flagrantly repressive anti-immigration law), combined with 
the fragmentation of the metro-area into nearly two dozen competing 
jurisdictions, essentially guarantee that, when the 
worst of times hit, common action and shared sacrifice will remain as 
insubstantial as a desert mirage. When one day the U-Haul vans all point away 
from town and the people of the Valley of the Sun clog the 
interstates heading for greener, wetter pastures, more than the brutal 
heat of a new climate paradigm will be driving them away. The breakdown 
of cooperation and connectedness will spur them along, too.
One 
day, some of them may look back and think of the real estate crash of 
2007-2008 and the recession that followed with fond nostalgia. The 
city’s economy was in the tank, growth had stalled, and for a while 
business-as-usual had nothing usual about it. But there was a rare kind 
of potential. That recession might have been the last best chance for 
Phoenix and other go-go Sunbelt cities to reassess their lamentably 
unsustainable habits and re-organize themselves, politically and 
economically, to get ready for life on the front burner of climate 
change. Land use, transportation, water policies, building codes, growth 
management -- you name it -- might all have experienced a healthy 
overhaul. It was a chance no one took. Instead, one or several decades 
from now, people will bet on a surer thing: they’ll take the road out of town.
 
William deBuys, a TomDispatch regular, is the author of seven books, most 
recently A Great Aridness: Climate Change and the Future of the American 
Southwest. He has long been involved in environmental affairs in the Southwest, 
including service as founding chairman of the Valles Caldera Trust, 
which administers the 87,000-acre Valles Caldera National Preserve in 
New Mexico.

http://www.alternet.org/superheated-american-city-dealing-110-degrees-33-days-phoenix-confronts-apocalyptic-climate-change?akid=10185.218754.-5WwwU&rd=1&src=newsletter809408&t=9


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to