MARCH 21, 2013
<http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/03/21/argo-and-the-stolen-truth-about-iran/print>
SHARE ON 
FACEBOOK<http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/03/21/argo-and-the-stolen-truth-about-iran/#>SHARE
ON 
TWITTER<http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/03/21/argo-and-the-stolen-truth-about-iran/#>SHARE
ON 
GOOGLE<http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&winname=addthis&pub=ra-4f60e2397d05b897&source=tbx-250&lng=en-US&s=google&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.counterpunch.org%2F2013%2F03%2F21%2Fargo-and-the-stolen-truth-about-iran%2F&title=Argo%20and%20the%20Stolen%20Truth%20About%20Iran%20%C2%BB%20Counterpunch%3A%20Tells%20the%20Facts%2C%20Names%20the%20Names&ate=AT-ra-4f60e2397d05b897/-/-/514bae827f583770/2&frommenu=1&uid=514bae820b66da69&ct=1&pre=http%3A%2F%2Fgreenhouse.economics.utah.edu%2Fpipermail%2Fmarxism%2F2013-March%2F148197.html&tt=0&captcha_provider=nucaptcha>MORE
SHARING 
SERVICES<http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/03/21/argo-and-the-stolen-truth-about-iran/#><http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/03/21/argo-and-the-stolen-truth-about-iran/#>
11<http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/03/21/argo-and-the-stolen-truth-about-iran/#>
The Price of Lies
Argo and the Stolen Truth About Iran
by MAHMOOD DELKHASTEH

This year’s Oscar-winning movie ‘Argo’ recently spurred Iran’s former
president, Abolhassan Banisadr to write an
article<http://www.csmonitor.com/layout/set/print/Commentary/Global-Viewpoint/2013/0305/Argo-helps-Iran-s-dictatorship-harms-democracy>
about
the ‘October Surprise’. In it, he discusses the secret deal between Ronald
Reagan and Ayatollah Khomeini which, by delaying the release of the
hostages being held in the US embassy in Tehran, swayed the results of the
1980 US presidential election to favour Reagan over the incumbent Jimmy
Carter. Banisadr argues that through ‘falsifying, misrepresenting and
taking critical facts out of context,’ the film ‘delivers a pro-CIA
message,’ and that by portraying Iranians as irrational and aggressive
people it prepares the US public to support a war should the current
nuclear negotiations fail.

The day after Banisadr’s article was published, Robert Parry, who had
written previously about the ‘short-sighted history of Argo’, wrote asecond
article <http://consortiumnews.com/2013/03/07/october-surprise-and-argo/>
supporting
these arguments. He added that ‘the House Task Force which was examining
this so-called October Surprise controversy in 1992 had come to the
conclusion that they had found “no credible evidence” of a
Republican-Iranian deal had reached such a conclusion only by ignoring
important facts and burying a letter from Banisadr letter detailing his
behind-the-scenes struggle with Khomeini and Khomeini’s son Ahmad over
their secret dealing with the Reagan campaign.

Soon after, Barbara Honneger, a former White House Domestic Policy Advisor
who had played a major role in exposing this secret deal, wrote an extended
comment<http://consortiumnews.com/2013/03/07/october-surprise-and-argo/#comment-151108>
on
Parry’s article. Her article illuminates how the report by the Task Force,
which was chaired by Rep. Lee Hamilton, was nothing but a ‘white wash and
cover up.’ One of its members, Dymally, drafted a Minority Report, but
Hamilton prevented him from publishing it through bullying and threatening
to fire his entire Congressional Staff. Honneger reveals how Banisadr’s
letter was coordinated with a two-hour press conference where she presented
reporters at the National Press Club with reams of incriminating evidence
on the October Surprise cover up (she is now planning to release a
videotape of this two-hour press conference). As she writes, this ‘flood of
last-minute’ evidence on that historic day implicated the Reagan-Bush
campaign in plans in delaying the release of the hostages, and led the Task
Force Chief Council Lawrence Barcella to ask Lee Hamilton to extend the
enquiry for a further three months. Hamilton refused.

This may seem puzzling at first. Why would Hamilton prefer to produce a
‘white wash and cover up’ report rather than extend the enquiry? The answer
could lie in a conversation he had with Banisadr before the Task Force was
established. In a personal interview, Banisadr revealed that Hamilton told
him if there had been a clandestine deal between Reagan and Khomeini, all
governments in the last twelve years would be considered illegal, and that
this would be extremely harmful for the political system. Banisadr told him
that the price of lying would be even higher, as the American people would
lose trust not only in politicians but the entire political system if they
became aware of this lie, which soon or late they would.

Here, we can see that Hamilton had already decided to produce his report
even before setting up the Task Force, as he had calculated that the price
of telling the truth would be extremely high. Had had he told the truth, it
is nearly certain that many of the political decisions which have had
disastrous global consequences, such as the invasions of Afghanistan and
Iraq, would not have taken place.

This brings me to my main point. It is that it is doubtful that Ben Affleck
intentionally produced a movie to serve the interests of warmongers in
Washington, and more likely that the script is over-reliant on CIA
documents. However, reactions to the movie provide us with an opportunity
to introduce what Robert Parry calls ‘America’s Stolen Narrative’ so that
Americans realize the price that they and the world have paid and are still
paying as a result of being lied to.

Oliver Stone once considered making a movie about the October Surprise. If
he again considered producing one based on facts rather than fiction, he
could make a major contribution to returning this stolen truth to the
historical record in the public mind. Recovering this may ultimately thwart
the advance of future wars that are already being planned by the very
people who helped bring Reagan to power.

*Mahmood Delkhasteh is a political sociologist, expert in Iranian
revolution and a human rights activist.  He is currently working on a new
book based on his doctoral dissertation, Islamic Discourses of Power and
Freedom in the Iranian Revolution, 1979-81.*

*
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/03/21/argo-and-the-stolen-truth-about-iran/
*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to