http://www.marxist.com/alan-woods-in-caracas-april-2013.htm


Alan Woods in 
Caracas<http://www.marxist.com/alan-woods-in-caracas-april-2013.htm>
Written by our correspondentWednesday, 10 April 2013
[image: 
Print]<http://www.marxist.com/alan-woods-in-caracas-april-2013/print.htm>[image:
E-mail]<http://www.marxist.com/component/option,com_mailto/link,12d2382fa1b476b1904f43e563c4855994eeebd4/tmpl,component/>

In the last week of March Alan Woods, founder of the Hands off Venezuela
campaign and leading figure of the International Marxist Tendency (IMT) was
in Venezuela. He was invited to participate in the Meeting of Intellectuals
and Artists in Defense of Humanity.

This meeting took place at a crucial turning point for the Bolivarian
Revolution. The death of Hugo Chavez, the man who had stood at the helm of
the Revolution for over 14 years, was a tremendous blow. Proving the false
propaganda about the “dictator” Chavez wrong, millions of people poured
onto the streets and squares in a spontaneous expression of deep-seated
grief.

[image: Alan Woods on
VTV]<http://www.marxist.com/images/stories/venezuela/alan-woods-vtv.jpeg>During
his trip Alan Woods appeared on the main Bolivarian TV channel VTVOn the
day of the funeral, between three and four million people were on the
streets of Caracas. Many were sobbing uncontrollably. But the most
remarkable thing was not so much this outpouring of sorrow, but the mood of
absolute determination to continue fighting. The mood of the masses is not
one of depression. It has become harder, more determined, more radical. As
Karl Marx explained, *the Revolution sometimes needs the whip of the
Counterrevolution*.

At the meeting there were several hundred people from different countries,
all of them sympathetic to the Bolivarian Revolution. But as usual they
were a very heterogeneous bunch. This was reflected in the different
commissions. Alan attended the one on the future of socialism in the 21st
 century.

The discussion was introduced by Carlos Fernandez Liria, a well-known left
wing professor of Philosophy at the Complutense University of Madrid.
Carlos stressed the importance of Marxism, which, as he correctly pointed
out, had not changed in its fundamentals since the days of Marx.

Alan spoke after him. In his speech, which, like all the other, was limited
to five minutes, he criticized the idea that there was a “21st century
socialism” that was somehow different to Marxism: “You speak of 21st century
socialism. But to this day nobody has ever been able to tell me what that
is. It is an empty bottle that can be filled with any content you wish.”

He then went on to ask a question: “Does anyone here believe that it is
possible to speak of socialism in Venezuela as long as the economic power
of the oligarchy remains in existence? In order to have socialism it is
necessary first to expropriate the land, the banks and the big monopolies
under the democratic control of the working class.”

That seemed to annoy one or two people present. Juan Carlos Monedero (also
of the Complutense University of Madrid, said: “We don’t know what 21st century
socialism is. It is just as well we do not know what it is. Everybody can
contribute, and in the end we will have a beautiful mosaic,” he asserted.

In general, all the interventions were extremely vague, abstract and often
completely empty of any content. In short, it resembled a typical
university seminar. But what else can one expect of intellectuals? The one
note of sanity was introduced by comrade Euler Calzadilla of the CMI (IMT),
a professional revolutionary from a poor working class family.

[image: imt congress 2010
12]<http://www.marxist.com/images/stories/imt/imt_congress_2010_12.jpg>Euler
CalzadillaEuler sharply criticised the idea that the working class was not
conscious enough to bring about socialism, an idea all too common in
pretentious intellectual and reformist circles. Defending the idea of
workers’ control, he challenged those present to come with him to one of
the occupied factories and see for themselves what the workers were capable
of. Significantly, this was the only intervention that got general
applause. Probably it gave some of those present a guilty conscience.

The next morning comrade Alan demanded, and got, the right to reply to
those who had criticised him the previous day. He mainly directed his
remarks to Juan Carlos Monedero, whose arguments he systematically
demolished:

“What you say is not coherent. It is not even consistent with everyday
experience. Just imagine that you go to the dentist with a toothache, and
the dentist says: ‘I have never studied dentistry and know nothing about
it, but open your mouth and I will give it a try. A fine ‘mosaic’ he would
make of your teeth! What would you do in such circumstances? You would run
away as fast as your legs would carry you!

“The same is true of every aspect of life. We expect some level of
knowledge and competence. Every aspect, it seems, except for socialism.
That is the most important question of all, and yet here, according to you,
anything goes. Well, I am sorry, Juan Carlos, but anything does not go!

“What is the matter with the Left nowadays? Are we so cowardly and useless
that we are afraid to mention Marxism?  By the way, it is entirely untrue
that President Chavez was not interested in theory. He was very interested
in theory, and constantly urged people to read the works of Marx, Lenin,
Trotsky, Rosa Luxemburg.

“There is a lot of talk about new ideas. But an idea is not necessarily
good because it is new, nor is it necessarily bad for being old. The wheel
has been around for a very long time, but it works rather well. What would
you say if some clever academic were to come here and say: ‘We need to
invent a new kind of wheel – a 21st century wheel? I do not know what such
a wheel would look like, but I do know that it would not carry us a single
millimetre further. Comrades! We have no need whatsoever to reinvent the
wheel.”

Alan’s speech had an effect, and several people came up to him to express
their agreement, including people from the 23 de Enero* *district, a very
militant poor neighbourhood of Caracas with strong revolutionary traditions.
Maduro: “We need HOV more than ever”

After the end of the sessions, it was announced that the man nominated by
Chavez as his successor, Nicolas Maduro, was coming to give a speech to the
conference. On his arrival in the hall, Maduro was greeted by many people.
But the only person he recognised and addressed by name was the founder of
Hands off Venezuela: “Alan, how are you?” he said, grasping his hand. “Keep
up your solidarity work. We need it now more than ever.” This was an
explicit recognition of the work of Hands off Venezuela.

Maduro delivered a very radical speech, during which he emphasized that
“Our Revolution is not just a democratic Revolution, not just an
anti-imperialist Revolution. It is a socialist Revolution, pledged to break
with capitalism”. He stressed that on a capitalist basis no future was
possible, not just for Venezuela but for the world.

A former driver on the Caracas metro, Maduro has come under heavy attacks
from the counterrevolutionary opposition. Revealing the class hatred of the
rich for the poor and the working class, they have made a big play of
Maduro’s working class origins, as if this were something that should
disqualify him for the office of President.

That evening Alan met with Adan Chavez, the brother of the late President,
who he has known for some years. Alan expressed his condolences to Adan,
who was clearly very affected by the tragedy. Thanking Alan for his words
of sympathy and solidarity, he said: “It has been very hard for all the
family. But we are slowly recovering. The fight must continue and we have
to find the strength to continue it.”

The story goes that one day in 1981, Adan and his brother, Hugo reached a
pact that they would take upon their shoulders the backpack of the
Revolution. If one of them fell on the way, Hugo said, the other must take
the load and continue. On March 5, 2013, at 4:25 pm, the masses themselves
took up the load when they poured onto the streets and squares with the
cry: “We are all Chavez”.
Media coverage

In the week of his stay in Caracas Alan Woods enjoyed very wide press and
TV coverage. The conservative newspaper *El Universal* carried a brief note
on Alan’s views (they did not find it convenient to reproduce the full text
of the interview they had originally proposed) under the heading: *Chavezism
according to Chavez'
followers*<http://www.eluniversal.com/nacional-y-politica/130324/el-chavismo-segun-los-chavistas>.
(The article also appeared in English
here<http://www.eluniversal.com/nacional-y-politica/130330/chavezism-according-to-chavezs-followers>
)<http://www.eluniversal.com/nacional-y-politica/130324/el-chavismo-segun-los-chavistas>

The mass circulated daily *Ultimas Noticias *also carried an interview with
Alan. He was one of only three people from the conference who were
interviewed. In his article he warned that the greatest danger faced by the
Bolivarian Revolution was what he called the Fifth Column – the
counterrevolutionary bureaucracy that represented the infiltration of the
revolutionary movement by bourgeois elements.

[image: Alan Woods in CiudadCCS - Click to enlarge the
picture]<http://www.marxist.com/images/stories/venezuela/AWCiudadCCS.jpg>Alan
Woods in CiudadCCS - Click to enlarge the pictureOn 27 March Alan was
interviewed in the Bolivarian newspaper*CiudadCCS*, which is distributed
free in Caracas and has a very wide audience. In this interview Alan
stressed the importance of the fact that President Chavez had claimed the
fight for socialism as the only way for humanity.

Expressing his support for Nicolas Maduro in the elections of 14 April,
Alan said: “The opposition attacks Nicolas because he is a worker. In what
country in the world can a bus driver become President? In the USA, which
claims to be a democracy, a President has to be a multi millionaire at
least.”

The same theme emerged when Alan was interviewed at prime time on VTV, the
main Bolivarian television channel. His statement that the bourgeois
opposition was attacking Maduro because of his working class origins was
subsequently taken up and repeated in extracts and sound bites on many
channels.

*Alan Woods on VTV:*

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=M7XsSeifNsM


Asked how he saw the situation in Venezuela, Alan began by praising the
revolutionary maturity of the masses: “It has been a very moving experience
to see how the people of this country, in a moment of pain and grief, was
able to rise above the pain and expressing their firm determination to
carry out the Revolution to the end. I can speak for everybody who was
present at the conference when I say that we were profoundly impressed by
this revolutionary spirit. Some were moved to tears by what they saw.

“This revolutionary spirit of the masses is the real motor force of the
process, the only hope for the future of the Revolution, which is now
facing a decisive juncture, as it did at the time of the coup in April
2002,” Alan said.  “These elections are a crucial point. It is very
necessary to fight for a convincing victory for Nicolas Maduro and to
inflict a decisive defeat the oligarchy and the bourgeoisie."

"We are all are strongly committed to fight for a resounding victory on 14
April,” he said.  At the same time, Alan stressed that the main tasks of
the Revolution had yet to be realized. “It is essential that the new
government should expropriate the land, the banks and the monopolies under
the democratic control of the working class,” he insisted.

Referring to the attempts to blacken the name of Chavez in the press, Alan
said he had never seen anything like the media campaigns that has been
unleashed against President Chavez and the Venezuelan Revolution
internationally, and which is now directed against Nicolas Maduro. “It's
quite amazing, the avalanche of lies that they are saying”, he remarked.

“Chavez's legacy to us is to keep fighting for socialism,” Woods said: “The
significance of Chavez is not limited to Venezuela, or even in Latin
America. It is global.”

This interview lasted for a quarter of an hour and was seen by a very large
number of people. Later Alan was the subject of a half hour interview on
Telesur, the Bolivarian answer to CNN, which is seen throughout Latin
America. The interview covered much the same ground as the other, but it
enabled Alan to go into these and other questioned in greater depth.

Asked about the relevance of Marxism today, comrade Woods pointed out that
the ideas of Marxism were the only ones that could explain the crisis of
capitalism. He pointed to the crisis of bourgeois economics, and the
complete inability of the economists to understand the crisis or offer any
alternative. “The most modern document today is still *The Communist
Manifesto*,” he said.

The death of Chavez was a blow, but it has also served to strengthen the
revolutionary will of the masses to change society. It has stiffened their
resolve and heightened their consciousness. The left wing will continue to
grow together with the Revolution.

Alan Woods was already well known before this trip. He is even better known
now. Many people who saw these programmes came up to Alan and thanked him
for his support for the revolutionary cause. The ideas of Marx, Engels,
Lenin and Trotsky will penetrate their consciousness. And the International
Marxist Tendency, which stands firmly for these ideas, will become an ever
more serious factor in the revolutionary equation.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to