US Prepares For War With Syria as pro-US  Opposition Loses Ground

By Thomas  Gaist

May 10, 2013 "_ Information Clearing House_ 
(file:///C:/Users/MICHAE~1/AppData/Local/Temp/wlmailhtml:{FE8317C8-F508-41AF-8708-97FB52074BD2}mid://0000006
1/) " -"_ WSWS_ 
(file:///C:/Users/MICHAE~1/AppData/Local/Temp/wlmailhtml:{FE8317C8-F508-41AF-8708-97FB52074BD2}mid://00000061/)
 " - - Calls for a war 
with Syria mounted  yesterday, despite mass popular opposition to war in the 
United States, amid  reports that US-backed Islamist opposition forces 
fighting the regime of Syrian  President Bashar al-Assad have suffered serious 
reverses.

Speaking on NBC  News yesterday, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip 
Erdogan pressed for  Washington to take military action against Syria.

He repeated  unsubstantiated allegations that the Assad regime has used 
chemical weapons,  which have been refuted by UN investigator Carla del Ponte, 
claiming, “It is  clear the regime has used chemical weapons and missiles.” 
Claiming that a “red  line” had been crossed, he said: “We want the United 
States to assume more  responsibilities and take further steps. And what 
sort of steps they will take,  we are going to talk about this.”

Erdogan dismissed out of hand reports  that chemical weapons used in Syria 
were in fact used by the US-backed  opposition.

He stressed that his government would support US imposition  of a “no-fly 
zone” in Syria, which would involve destroying Syrian air defenses  and 
shooting down any Syrian aircraft that took to the skies.

Erdogan’s  calls for military action were echoed across the American press. 
The Washington  Post ’s editorial board called for “an air campaign as 
well as arms for the  moderate opposition” aimed to “quickly tip the military 
balance against the  Assad regime.” Wall Street Journal columnist Bret 
Stephens proposed a long list  of attacks against Assad, including sending in 
US 
ground forces: “disable the  runways of Syrian air bases, including the 
international airport in Damascus…use  naval assets to impose a no-fly zone 
over 
western Syria…supply the Free Syrian  Army with heavy military equipment, 
including armored personnel carriers and  light tanks; and be prepared to 
seize and remove Syria’s chemical weapons  stockpile, even if it means putting 
boots (temporarily) on the  ground.”

The calls for war come amid reports of major setbacks in Syria  for the 
US-backed opposition, reflecting its small size and lack of popular  support, 
and growing military assistance from Russia, Iran, and Lebanon for the  Assad 
regime.

After two months of heavy bombardment, government forces  have retaken the 
strategic town of Khirbet Ghazaleh from the “rebels,”  re-opening 
government transport routes to Deraa, the city where initial  opposition 
protests 
began two years ago. Opposition leaders acknowledged it as a  major setback. “
Tomorrow, the big tragedy will happen, the regime’s supply route  to Deraa 
will reopen, and the officers will go back and ammunition will be  resupplied 
and the bombardment will resume,” said Abu Yacoub, commander of the  Martyrs 
of Khirbet Ghazaleh brigade.

Yesterday, BBC Middle East bureau  chief Paul Danahar wrote that the Free 
Syrian Army (FSA) amounts to little more  than “men with guns,” united only 
by the fact that they “point their guns in the  same direction.” He said 
the FSA is not a “cohesive force” and lacks a “command  structure.”

A Jerusalem Post article of May 3rd entitled “Is Assad  Winning in Syria?” 
describes the defeat of opposition militias around Qusayr by  Hezbollah 
forces, as well as the capture of Otaiba by Assad’s forces last week,  
indicating the growing strength of Assad vis-à-vis the US proxy forces.  
According 
to the article, “morale among supporters of the regime has improved  markedly 
in recent weeks.” It concluded, “Assad shows no signs of  cracking.”

Under these conditions, Assad’s allies are stepping up  military deliveries 
to Damascus. The Russian government has announced plans to  sell S-300 
anti-aircraft missile systems to Syria, in a $900 million deal that  would 
substantially bolster the Syrian regime’s capacity to defend itself  against US 
and Israeli airstrikes.

Secretary of State John Kerry  criticized the sale as “destabilizing,” and 
the Israeli government appealed to  Russia to halt the transaction. Syria’s 
purchase comes in after Israeli air  strikes that used long-range “stand-off
” missiles to attack Damascus from beyond  the Syrian border.

On Thursday, Iran vowed to respond to the Israeli  raids with “blows under 
the belt in several locations.” Iran’s envoy to Syria,  Ali Akbar Salehi, 
promised “full and unlimited support from Iran, politically,  militarily, and 
economically, to the Syrian leadership and people, against the  takfiris 
[Al Qaeda-type Sunni extremist forces], terrorists, Israel, the US, and  all 
who dare attack this country.”

Also on Thursday, Hezbollah leader  Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah announced that 
Syria would supply his militia “special  weapons it never had before,” 
calling the decision “game-changing.” The weapons  are apparently being 
transferred as a response to Israel’s air strikes on  Damascus. “This is the 
Syrian strategic reaction,” he explained.

These  deliveries highlight the broad regional implications of the proxy 
war Washington  has waged against the Assad regime, relying primarily on 
Islamist forces tied to  Al Qaeda, and the risk of a US war in Syria escalating 
into a regional or even  global conflict.

There is broad opposition in the working class to the US  drive to war in 
Syria overseen by President Barack Obama and the Democratic  Party. A recent 
poll pegged popular opposition to war at 62 percent of the US  population.

The conflict has already taken a horrific toll on the Syrian  people. Over 
the past several months, the number of Syrians displaced from their  homes 
by the war has increased from 2 million to 4.25 million. A total of 6.8  
million Syrians, including 3.1 million children, are classified as “in dire 
need 
 of humanitarian assistance” by the UN’s Office of the Coordination of  
Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).

Jordanian officials have stated that Syrian  refugees now make up 10 
percent of Jordan’s total population, with this figure  set to explode to 40 
percent by mid-2014 on current trends.

The ramping  up of US military operations against Syria is accompanied by 
diplomatic efforts  to bring about a post-Assad government on terms favorable 
to US imperialism.  Secretary of State John Kerry has sought an agreement 
with Russia, which would  pave the way for a power-sharing arrangement.

This plan also received  significant endorsement in US strategic and media 
circles. Zbigniew Brzezinski,  a prominent architect of US imperial policy, 
issued a strong criticism of  proposed US military action against Syria, 
proposing instead to try to involve  Russia and China in US plans to remove 
Assad through diplomacy.

He said,  “The various schemes that have been proposed for a kind of 
tiddlywinks  intervention from around the edges of the conflict­no-fly 
zones, 
bombing  Damascus and so forth­would simply make the situation worse. 
None of the  proposals would result in an outcome strategically beneficial for 
the US On the  contrary, they would produce a more complex, undefined slide 
into the worst-case  scenario. The only solution is to seek Russia’s and 
China’s support for  U.N.-sponsored elections in which, with luck, Assad might 
be ‘persuaded’ not to  participate.”

Along these lines, David Ignatius of the Washington Post  proposed “a 
military transition government” that would include “reconcilable  elements of 
Assad’s army,” under the leadership of US-backed General Salim  Idriss, a 
defector who now commands Syrian opposition  forces.

Effectively, US officials are hoping that, in the context of  negotiations 
jointly organized by the Russian government, they could persuade  Syrian 
officers to organize a coup to oust Assad, and then make a deal with the  
US-backed opposition. Their plan involves a new ruling coalition composed of  
opposition and regime elements, described by Ignatius as a “military transition 
 government that would include reconcilable elements of Assad’s army.” 
Assad  would be removed, though lower-ranking members of his government might  
remain.

Copyright © 1998-2013 World Socialist Web Site

 
 
Link to the article: 
http://www.actionla.org:8080/actionla/front/detailed3.jsp?newsId=1071&title=5/10:%20US%20Prepares%20For%20War%20With%20Syria%20as%2
0pro-US%20Opposition%20Loses%20Ground&filename=1368344918489&ext=jpg 


===================================================
===========================
Peace NO War Network_ http://www.PeaceNOWar.net_ 
(http://www.peacenowar.net/)  
War  is not the answer, for only love can conquer hate
Not in our Name! And  another world is possible!

Information for antiwar movements, news  across the World, please visit:_  
http://www.PeaceNoWar.net_ (http://www.peacenowar.net/) 
e-mail: _Info@PeaceNoWar.net_ (mailto:pe...@actionla.org) 
Tel:  (213)403-0131

Please Join PeaceNoWar Listserv, send e-mail to: 
_peacenowar-subscribe@lists.riseup.net_ 
(mailto:peacenowar-subscr...@lists.riseup.net) 

Please Donate to Peace No War Network!
Send check  pay to:
ActionLA/AFGJ

ActionLA
P.O. Box  751
South Pasadena, CA 91031-0751
(All donations are tax  deductible)



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to