EPA Dramatically Weakens Radiation Protection
For Immediate Release
Contacts: Dan Hirsch Committee to Bridge the Gap 831 336 8003
Diane D’Arrigo Nuclear Information and Resource Service 301 270 6477 x 15
April 15, 2013


The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is publishing in the 
Federal Register today controversial new Protective Action Guides (PAGs) for 
responding to radioactive releases. 


EPA says it solicits public comment but is nonetheless making the PAGs 
immediately effective. 
The new PAGs eliminate requirements to evacuate people in the face of high 
projected 
thyroid, skin, or lifetime whole body doses; recommend dumping radioactive 
waste in 
municipal garbage dumps not designed for such waste; propose five options for 
drinking
water, which would dramatically increase the permitted concentrations of 
radioactivity in 
drinking water, by as much as 27,000 times, compared to EPA’s current Safe 
Drinking 
Water Act limits; and suggest markedly relaxing long-term cleanup standards.


“In essence the government is now saying nuclear power accidents could produce 
such 
widespread contamination and produce such high radiation levels that the 
government 
should abandon efforts to clean it up and instead force people to live with 
radiation
-induced cancer risks orders of magnitude higher than ever considered 
acceptable,” said 
Daniel Hirsch, president of Committee to Bridge the Gap.


The PAGs are intended to guide the response to nuclear power reactor accidents 
(like 
Fukushima in Japan, Chernobyl in Ukraine and Three Mile Island in the U.S.), 
“dirty 
bomb” explosions, radioactive releases from nuclear fuel and weapons 
facilities, and 
nuclear transportation accidents.


“EPA ignores the fact that women and kids are at even greater risk from 
radiation. The
doses permitted by the 2013 EPA PAGs will allow indecent exposures to 
radiation,” 
says Diane D’Arrigo of Nuclear Information and Resource Service. “Women are 50%
more vulnerable than men and children are at even greater risk from radiation 
than adults, according to data from the National Academy of Sciences.” 

Extremely high food contamination levels would be allowed by the incorporation 
of Food and Drug Administration 1998 guidance. EPA officials had previously 
criticized those standards, saying that 1 in 50 people eating
food at those levels would get cancer from their exposure, on top of our normal 
cancer risk.

The PAGs also incorporate and expand controversial Dept. of Homeland 
Security(DHS) PAGs adopted in 2008 which would allow long-term doses as high as 
thousandsof millirems per year without cleanup 
being required.  Associated guidance for carrying out the long-term cleanup, 
prepared for DHS 
and for which the comment period expires today, recommends abandoning EPA’s 
long-held cleanup standards and instead allowing people to be exposed to doses 
as high as the equivalent of three 
chest X rays a day for one’s entire life. Over 70 years, EPA estimates 1 in 6 
people 
would get cancer from exposure that high, orders of magnitude higher risk than 
EPA has 
historically said is acceptable
.
In addition, EPA admits that a nuclear power accident could far exceed the 
capacity 
of radioactive waste sites to manage waste generated from cleanups and 
thereforesuggests allowing the waste togo to regular trash dumps, a fight the 
public has waged for decades in the US.

for more information:
www.committeetobridgethegap.org
and www.bit.ly/radstandards

See also
Strict radiation reference levels shunned to stem Fukushima exodus
http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201305250053


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to