Obama honors Martin Luther King, one of the greatest anti war activists
ever, and then goes back to perpetual war 3 days later.

Scott

   *THAT WAS THEN, THIS IS NOW*
<http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2012/12/21/roots-john-kerry-secretary-state-ambition-lie-wake-defeat/kBhd57q7n0LZVY4GYLIeOO/story.html>

*Does anyone remember the John Kerry of 1971, when, newly returned from
Vietnam, he was a leader in the anti-war movement, and he spoke before a
Congressional
committee<http://www.wintersoldier.com/index.php?topic=Testimony>trying
to convince them that Vietnam was a debacle and that American
soldiers were torturing and slaughtering civilians left and right? What
happened to that John Kerry? What happened to the seeker of peace? Now he's
as extreme a warmonger as George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. Now, he's urging
the U.S. to bomb Syria. Now, he even admits that the imperial excursion
might call for ground troops <http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/10748>.
*
*
*
*Who is this John Kerry? -LS*
**

------------------------------

*ALLIES*

[image: Pearl Harbor Not Actually an act of WAR... just a limited air
strike with no boots on the ground. (THINK ABOUT IT)]
 <http://pinterest.com/pin/184436547213316048/>

*Cutting out the heart of your enemy and eating it? On tape? These are the
people<http://humanrightsinvestigations.org/2013/05/14/syria-rebel-organ-eating-video/>Obama,
Kerry, McCain, et. al. want to cooperate with?? -LS
*
**

------------------------------

*ECONOMIC RECOVERY MY ASS*
**


*The Obama administration continues to push for Larry Summers to head the
Fed<http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/06/media-acquiescence-larry-summers-supporters>.
Summers was a major advocate of bank deregulation during the Clinton
administration, leading us to the economic crash of 2008 and the crimes of
bankers that continue to this day. But hey, no problem -- what're a few
more million people out of work and out of homes, as long as the rich get
what they want? -LS*
*
*
**
------------------------------

*I've said it till I'm blue in the face: if a Republican were in the White
House now, the liberal establishment would be screaming bloody murder. But
because a Democrat is, there's a lot of coughing, harrumphing, shuffling
of feet, and looking the other way. It's hypocrisy. And it's indefensible. -
*Lisa Simeone <http://abombazine.com>


What Happened to the Anti-War
Movement?<http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/what_happened_to_the_anti-war_movement_20130905>

By David Sirota <http://www.truthdig.com/david_sirota/>


*A mere 72 hours after President Obama delivered an encomium honoring the
life of Dr. Martin Luther King, he announced his intention to pound yet
another country with bombs.* *The oxymoron last week was noteworthy for how
little attention it received. Yes, a president memorialized an anti-war
activist who derided the U.S. government as “the greatest purveyor of
violence in the world.” Then that same president quickly proposed yet more
violence—this time in Syria.*

*Among a political press corps that rarely challenges the Washington
principle of “kill foreigners first, ask questions later,” almost nobody
mentioned the contradiction.* Even worse, as Congress now debates whether
to launch yet another military campaign in the Middle East, the anti-war
movement that Dr. King represented—and that so vigorously opposed the last
war—is largely silent. Sure, there have been a few perfunctory emails from
liberal groups, but there seems to be little prospect for mass protest,
raising questions about whether an anti-war movement even exists anymore.

*So what happened to that movement? The shorter answer is: It was a victim
of partisanship.*

That’s the conclusion that emerges from a recent study by professors at the
University of Michigan and Indiana University. *Evaluating surveys of more
than 5,300 anti-war protestors from 2007 to 2009, the researchers
discovered that the many protestors who self-identified as Democrats
“withdrew from anti-war protests when the Democratic Party achieved
electoral success” in the 2008 presidential election.*

Had there been legitimate reason to conclude that Obama’s presidency was
synonymous with the anti-war cause, this withdrawal might have been
understandable. But that’s not what happened—the withdrawal occurred even
as Obama was escalating the war in Afghanistan and intensifying drone wars
in places like Pakistan and Yemen.* The researchers thus conclude that
during the Bush years, many Democrats were not necessarily motivated to
participate in the anti-war movement because they oppose militarism and
war—they were instead “motivated to participate by anti-Republican
sentiments.”*

*Not surprisingly, this hyper-partisan outlook and the lack of a more
robust anti-war movement explain why political calculations rather than
moral questions are at the forefront of the Washington debate over a war
with Syria.*

In that Beltway back and forth, the national media has focused as much on
the horserace (will an attack politically weaken the president?) and
political tactics (should the president have submitted to a congressional
vote?) than on whether an attack would actually make things better in
Syria. Similarly, a top Democratic strategist told CNN that potential
Republican opposition to a Syria attack “will coalesce Democrats around the
president” in support of a military strike. Confirming that dynamic,
Democratic Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton said a war resolution will
pass not because of the supposed merits of an attack on Syria, but simply
“because of loyalty of Democrats” who “just don’t want to see (Obama)
shamed and humiliated on the national stage.”

*This is red-versus-blue tribalism in its most murderous form. It suggests
that the party affiliation of a particular president should determine
whether or not we want that president to kill other human beings. It
further suggests that we should all look at war not as a life-and-death
issue, but instead as a sporting event in which we blindly root for a
preferred political team.*

*An anti-war movement is supposed to be a check on such reflexive
bloodlust. It is supposed to be a voice of reason interrupting the partisan
tribalism. When it, too, becomes a victim of that tribalism, we lose
something more than a political battle. As the distorted debate over Syria
proves, we lose the conscience that is supposed to guide us through the
most vexing questions of all.*


*David Sirota is the best-selling author of the books “Hostile Takeover,”
“The Uprising,” and “Back to Our Future.” Email him at d...@davidsirota.com,
follow him on Twitter @davidsirota or visit his website at
www.davidsirota.com.*


http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/what_happened_to_the_anti-war_movement_20130905
**
------------------------------

*
*
*If you wish to be removed from this list, please let us know*
**
*To join the Liberty Underground news service go here:
http://luvnews.info/Join.htm*
**
*You may also join our talk group at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertyundergroundtalk/ if you would like to
participate
*
*or join our Facebook group here:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461619557192964/**.

*
*email: libert...@hotmail.com*
**
*Tell your friends about LUV News because some people just don't get it.*




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/laamn@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/

Reply via email to