Just a quick follow up: JCR seems quite right. Bernd
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Bernd Fondermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Gerolf Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > personally, i don't have experience with JCR, but two fellow wicket > > committers > > will be releasing a wrapper for the JCR API soon (around May 1st), > > basically to get rid of all the checked exceptions, but also with other > nice > > features :) > > so maybe this would be an option... > > > > Gerolf > > we should at least try JCR. > > Maybe discuss first the general structure of the repository (nodes and > stuff). How should we put eveything in place? > > I will now refresh my JCR memory so I can reply soundly to any ideas > brought up here :-) > > Bernd > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
