On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Gerolf Seitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > > i was wondering whether we should conform to the original RFCs or the > latest bis revisions (and somehow treat the bis revisions as approved RFCs)? > as we're in labs, we could go with the 'bleeding edge' ;) > > however, the order of the sections have changed compared to the original > RFCs. > eg. resource binding: RFC3920:7 vs. RFC3920bis-04:8 > > so i'd rather stick to the original (exclusive) or to the latest bis > revision, to avoid > confusion as to which revision is used, etc... > > my vote would be +1 for the latest bis revision :)
this has my sympathy. yet I don't know what that buys us. 3920f is what all the clients and servers out there are coded against. We _have_ to comply to them if we want to be interoperable. The diff is not too big I think, so that should be no big deal complying to both, RFCs and BISs. Bernd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
