Thanks Bob. Development on Labyrinth has kind of stopped, but I'm glad it's
still useful. :-)

On 11 December 2016 at 04:59, Bob Newell <bobnew...@bobnewell.net> wrote:

> I couldn't find much with a quick look. But yes, I have (re)invented this
> wheel and it seems to work.
>
> There can be as much or little structure as desired and I can output an
> outline-like file *provided* that I ignore circular links. I do this by
> saying that a parent can have any number of children, but a child can only
> have one parent, and if I encounter a link that is a second parent for  a
> given node, I simply ignore that link.
>
> Of course, all nodes don't have to be linked to other nodes or to the
> origin. There can be any amount of standalone structure.
>
> I'll spruce things up a bit and post here in a few days. It's relatively
> crude but it works.
>
> I could have stayed with VYM, which already outputs org-mode and many
> others, but I do like Labyrinth's ease of use and particularly speed of
> use, in addition to the completely free-form placement of nodes. I'm
> finding it to be a terrific tool for developing ideas for fiction.
>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Labyrinth Discussion" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to labyrinth-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Labyrinth Discussion" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to labyrinth-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to