> >Actually in math "and" is "times" and "or" is "plus". > > In my school days (40+ yrs ago), "and" was +, "times" was x, and "or", > being very indefinite, belonged not to mathemathics, but to philosophy > (and to history, and to daily budgeting <g>)
Ah, right, I didn't go to school in the US, so I missed this one. But in math fields like logic "and" is multiplication and "or" is addition, because "1 or 0" is 1 just like "1+0", and both "1 and 0" and "1*0" are 0. > >I don't know, I always heard the version without "love". > > Very few of us read The "right stuff" at all, much less read it > carefully these days; we're in too much of a hurry... I myself knew the > original quote, but didn't think to question the one supplied, as > that's the one in "common circulation" I must say the original version makes much more sense than the common one. There's nothing wrong with money, really. You can buy bobbins with it <g>. Weronika To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line: unsubscribe lace-chat [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]