Quite..... Sue in EY On 3 Dec 2009, at 17:05, laceandb...@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 03/12/2009 16:19:27 GMT Standard Time, > nestalace.ca...@btopenworld.com writes: > Now these checks are to find out whether people who come into > contact with > young children *have not been guilty of any offences* - sexual > abuse/physical abuse etc. against young children or vulnerable > adults. (For the record, > I haven't!!) > > > Now of course, that is the crux of the whole matter. The CRB checks > will > only pick up someone who has already been found guilty of offences > against > children. Most of the recent headline cases involve people who had > their CRB > clearance, because they had not previously been caught. > > It may be because you are teaching *groups*, which I read to mean > that not > all the children are in their own home with their own parents, but > most > other people that have anything at all to do with children seem to > need them - > except parents, siblings and relatives. And when children are > abused, who > are they most at risk from? Say no more. > > Jacquie in Lincolnshire > > To unsubscribe send email to majord...@arachne.com containing the > line: > unsubscribe lace-chat y...@address.here. For help, write to > arachnemodera...@yahoo.com. Regards Sue. To unsubscribe send email to majord...@arachne.com containing the line: unsubscribe lace-chat y...@address.here. For help, write to arachnemodera...@yahoo.com.
