On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:24:23 -0700, Weronika wrote: >> >Which means: I can put a picture on my website, but not the pricking, and I >> >should name the source - correct? >> >> Not in my opinion. Many people do this, but I believe it is a breach of >> copyright. A completed piece of lace is a 'derivative work' from the >> pricking, and is subject to just the same copyright limitations as a >> straight copy of the pricking. > >Hmmm... You mean the designer of the pattern actually holds copyright on the >piece of lace I made, and images of it??? That seems very strange!
The lace no, but images of it, yes. -- The future will be better tomorrow. - Dan Quayle Steph Peters, Manchester, England [EMAIL PROTECTED] Scanned by WinProxy http://www.Ositis.com/ - To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line: unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
