No, I did mention printing. I have printed digital photos on regular photographic paper and they are, to my eye, identical to 35 mm film prints, at least at the 5x7" size. If you want to print 8x10", then you should get a higher end camera with more megapixels (my low-end camera is 2 megapixels, but you can get 5 or 6 megapixels; just that you should know that those cameras are real memory hogs and slower than the cheaper ones, so you have to balance that out with how often you're going to need the extra high resolution).
I upload my digital shots to a local camera site, pay on-line, and they give the photos to my coworker, who lives next to the owner of the business, and he brings them to work. Saves on shipping! <g> Avital On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:44:05 +1000 (EST), Helene Gannac > I just want to say that you still haven't convinced me that *printed* > digital photos are any good, everyone just talks about viewing them > onscreen, but I do recognize that zooming seems to be better with a > digital. Oh, well, I'll have to get DH to buy one, and I'll keep my SLR, > and we'll have the best of both worlds...:-) - To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line: unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
