Hello to One and All!

I have made lots of lace pieces for my DD clothing. And yes they do get some wear. She used to wear the "Holly Hobby" dresses. (The long sleeved dress underneath with the jumper over it.) At her request, all of these dresses are going to be recycled into several quilts for her. The dresses with the lace are going to be included in the quilt. One dark blue with white pin dot dress still has the tatting around the colar intact. I'm just going to incorporate the collar into the quilt without cutting it up. AKA Crazy quilts.

Susie Rose - Up in the mountains outside of Las Vegas

Prayers, love and hugs go out to all who are in need.

http://360.yahoo.com/susierose_89124

Cold Creek Creations: Custom Clothing, Quilts and a whole lot more!

UFO 12 for 12;  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UFO12for12/

Death by Socks: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DeathbySocks

----- Original Message ----- From: "Beth Schoenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lace" <lace@arachne.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: [lace] Plastic Storage and Some Washing Warnings


Jen, you wrote:

Can't but help playing devil's advocate here <g>

Does every single item of lace have to become a museum piece? Is that the
best, ultimate fate for a piece of lace? What is so inherently wrong in
handmade lace being used for that which it was originally intended - ie
decoration on a special garment or other item? Yes, some precious things
should be looked after to the "nth" degree, and kept in a museum (although
they may hardly be looked at, and then only by knowledgable specialists).
But lace was made to be used/worn and displayed in all its glory.

Nothing lasts for ever, no matter how it's cared for. Yes, take proper care with pieces that are to be kept because of thier historic/sentimental value or
exquisite working. But I can't see what's so terrible about using handmade
lace on a garment, even if it is old and may have been treated/used in a
manner which might make some people shudder.

Please, I'm not having a go at anyone, just wanted to mention a different
viewpoint.

Happy New Year's Eve Eve!

Jen in Melbourne, Australia
(hot and sunny, forecast temp for tomorrow 42 degs celcius (I think that's
about 108 deg F) & I don't have aircon!)
<snip>

Hi, Jen,

You're absolutely right. Every last bit we make should /*not*/ be considered precious, heirloom, and/or museum-quality. Some laces are made just for fun.
How valuable a piece is supposed to be is one of the decisions we all make
when we start a piece of lace, or acquire one (whether we think all that much about it, or glide over it quickly :-D ). There's no reason any lace-maker
shouldn't visualize a finite life for his/her work -- gods know, there are
plenty of worse ways to "kill" time!

The problem I have is that too much heartbreaking-ly misguided cleaning and preservation information is recommended without any real scientific basis for
the recommendations. Some of this advice even claims to be up to museum
standards.  Ordinary people, who have no reason to know what the latest
conservation information really is, are being mis-led and cheated into
destroying the laces they are trying to conserve (for themselves or their
families/heirs).

Look at lots of the advice given to non-textile-specialists. These folks
without background will follow the advice as stated, believing the writers of the magazine article/book/internet essay are the experts they appear to be. With the best of intentions, and /*thinking they've done their research*/, the
owners end up with yellow, brown, or shredded textiles way before they and
their families want to, sometimes well within living memory of the days when the lace was new. But the advisers never "scale" the advice they're giving to
the value of the objects they're discussing (in terms of worthiness or
desirable degree of preservation).  It's not surprising, really, when they
don't even check the base scientific accuracy of their stated opinions. There is good science out there, why can't these advisers use it? You'd think museum folks kept all their information top-secret or something. (Hi, Devon!) :-D

Easier but less-preservative kinds of cleaning and storage are perfectly
appropriate for many of the things we make (I think of the Christmas card
exchange pieces, which, lovely as they are, usually take little time to make and are probably all stored in and with paper, foil, stickers with plastic and glue, etc. -- feel free to correct me if I've got this one wrong). We're all grown-ups here, we get to decide these things for ourselves, don't we? But
then, /*we*/ all know about good, bad, and terrible lace care.  Not to
mention, where to go to find out more, when we need to.  :-D

Bottom line is, as you feel it necessary, keep two or three different kinds of
storage for your laces, ranging from "keeping it clean and tidy between
uses/showings" to "someday a museum (and its huge public) will want to see and acquire this, if I keep it as pristine and intact as I can until they discover it." Decide which degree of persnickety you want to bother yourself with for each piece of lace you own, and store each where and how you think best. Be flexible: you may decide you really should listen to the "expert" who sees your things and cries, "<GASP!!!> That's a piece of early 17th-century Point
d'XXXX!!  Why are you storing it folded into a piece of pink computer
paper?!!!?" and change a treatment now and then.  Otherwise, they're your
responsibility and your burden, if not your creation: so you decide.

/*Very Important Note*/, here: the reason the
persnickety-care-to-the-Nth-degree advice is, and should be, given as blanket advice for /*all*/ laces is because it is the ultimate fall-back position for textile carers: it's the one regimen of care that no-one can be faulted on, no matter what happens to the lace in the end. After all, lace, once rotted away, can never really be repaired or re-created. And "never" is a disgustingly long time, as I have discovered in my cranky old age. :-D I don't suppose there
are many on this list who'd want to see good, well-made lace stupidly or
wantonly destroyed. Me, I "make lace for the ages" whenever I can, and it's worth my time to take care of them that way. It's another hobby, almost --
kind of like spangling bobbins...  :-D

The other reason for using persnickety-care standards is that the values of laces change over time, and so, if at all possible, lace care should err on the side of caution. You just never know what that crossover point will be,
when your down-valued fun-lace becomes your great-grandchild's treasured
heirloom, or becomes part of a museum's collection of art, craft, or lovely exemplar objects of a particular time and place. Remember pertinent little things about today's antique laces: like, how fine the finest thread is that you've ever seen, and how it matched up (or couldn't) to those super-fine and now un-reproducible historic lace threads; or how little the lacemakers, lace
factors, teachers, and sellers of centuries past thought their utilitarian
little sample books were worth at the time, compared to how valuable we think
them now.

At least /*we*/ can use lists like Arachne, among other reliable resources, to
keep double-checking and updating the base scientific accuracy of our own
opinions. Look at how happily all of us here jump on bits of new info, share
it around, and debate the merits!  :-D

Happy New Year, everyone!

/*Beth Schoenberg*/
-- in oppressively hot-beautiful-downtown Kambah, Canberra, where in two days
the weather has switched over to "summer lace making (bobbin lace)" mode,
since it's easier to keep my greasy fingers off of bobbin-lace threads than needle-lace threads. Only I can't find the thread for my current piece, and
it's too hot to go hunting....

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to