Hi Lucie & Jeri,

Just a note to say that I agree with you, Lucie, absolutely,
and that your 
comments are excellent. I think you make many good points,
right down to the 
important parallel with biodiversity.

I have a book that I
wrote 30 years ago digitized on a big computer tape that, 
even if it is
magnetically readable anymore, which is unlikely, it isn't 
practicably
readable because I wouldn't know where to find a functioning 
computer-tape
reader of the type used 30 years ago nor the operating system and
word-processor under which it was written.  When I contemplated writing a
second 
edition of the book a few years ago, I turned to my hard-copy for the
text...

So Jeri, your library is still valuable to the larger lace community,
and one 
that a good museum with a good lace collection would probably be very
interested 
in preserving. (What many university libraries are doing, on the
other hand, is 
a disaster in the making.)

Nancy
Connecticut, USA
________________________________
From: "lucie...@uottawa.ca"
<lucie...@uottawa.ca>
To: jeria...@aol.com
Cc: lace@arachne.com;
lacefa...@roadrunner.com
Sent: Sat, September 25, 2010 1:47:28 PM
Subject: Re:
[lace] Lace Library

In some ways, digital libraries are a very good thing. In
others, not.

Not everything ever published will ever be digitised. Only what
someone,
somewhere will choose to find time, money and computer space to copy.
Electronic media are fragile in their own ways and they do need
electricity to
work. They also need the electronic means to be used and
that does mean having
access to and the means to use the proper protocoles
(so do you have the right
version of flash or adobe or whatever else is
being used ritht now? will it
still be readable in 10 years?)

Systems can crash, be hacked, be compromised
or data files corrupted, or
erased. Just because its digitized does not mean
it is permanent.

And they are no more or less impervious to physical damage
caused by war,
malice, cataclysm or fate.

To abandon one means of
trans-generational memory that works for another
that may work is folly.

Why
not maximise memory by investing in all forms of remembering? People,
books,
films, and yes, digital libraries, in all languages and all
available media. A
kind of memory biodiversity ...

Lucie DuFresne
Canada

-
To unsubscribe send
email to majord...@arachne.com containing the line:
unsubscribe lace
y...@address.here. For help, write to
arachne.modera...@gmail.com

-
To unsubscribe send email to majord...@arachne.com containing the line:
unsubscribe lace y...@address.here. For help, write to
arachne.modera...@gmail.com

Reply via email to