A long reply for Clay and others interested in Queen Victoria's  laces:
 
I do not know the source of your information (below),  Clay.  Queen 
Victoria was a very sentimental woman and wore her  wedding laces throughout 
her 
life.  Several of us have written  frequently on Arachne about Queen 
Victoria's laces, and many of those memos have  been from me.  I know the 
ladies in 
the U.K. have seen exhibits of her lace  many times, while I have seen the 
wedding lace only 3 times.
 
The costume and lace experts to whom I have turned for information for  the 
past few decades are:
 
1.  Elsie Luxton & Yusai Fukuyama - "Royal Honiton Lace",  Batsford, 1988, 
ISBN 0-7134-5764-3, 95-page hardback.  This gives a  comprehensive history 
and view of Queen Victoria's wedding lace and royal  christening robe - many 
black/white pictures.  An  interesting unrelated section of the book is the 
reproduction of  10 pages (in old English) of 1695 documents enacted by 
Parliament.   This book may be borrowed from IOLI's library.  It is item H-034.
 
2.  Kay Staniland - "In Royal Fashion - The Clothes of Princess  Charlotte 
of Wales and Queen Victoria 1796-1901", Museum of London, 1997, ISBN  
0-904818-77-2, 192-page limp cover, artbook size.  This scholar/author is  
well-known in the U.K. for her costume history expertise, and especially that 
of  
these two royal daughters.  I'd venture to say she is as well known as  
Santina Levey, but in the field of costume.  This book has photos of Queen  
Victoria as an old woman, dressed for royal weddings, with her wedding lace  
flounce sewn to her black gowns.   Here is a picture  caption:  
 
"In 1897 this photograph was used as an official Jubilee portrait, but it  
had actually been taken on 6 July 1893 at the time of the marriage of Prince 
 George, Duke of York, to Princess Mary of Teck, the last occasion on which 
the  Queen wore her wedding lace.  She had previously worn the lace at the  
marriage of Prince Leopold in 1882, and again a photograph taken at the 
time was  issued in 1887 as an official portrait.  The design shows up 
particularly  well on its black satin ground.  The Queen is also wearing her 
wedding 
veil  with the small diamond crown made for her in 1870, and a portrait 
bracelet of  the Prince Consort."
 
In the Royal Collection there is a huge painting of the actual  wedding 
called "The Marriage of Queen Victoria, 10 February 1840, by  Sir George 
Hayter.  About this, Staniland wrote a caption for the  painting:  "The figure 
of 
the Queen shows her dress complete with its  original court train (no longer 
extant)."  
 
This Staniland book is not in the IOLI's library.  Suggest  interlibrary 
loan -- well worth the trouble to get for a fascinating read.   The cased 
version is ISBN 0-904818-55-1.
 
3.  A 32-page booklet (H-075) that is in IOLI's library is by Kay  
Staniland and Santina M. Levey - "Queen Victoria's Wedding Dress and Lace", The 
 
Costume Society (U.K.), 1983, no ISBN.  This has a couple good photographs  of 
the dress and lace, and a black/white photo of the wedding  painting 
described in 2 (above).
 
4.  As a long-time member of "The Lace Guild", I can say that  there have 
been articles in their bulletins through the years about  Queen Victoria's 
laces.
 
5.  Quite recently, it was reported on Arachne that a new  christening gown 
was made for Prince Edward's youngest child -- because by now  the original 
christening gown used since Queen Victoria's time was too fragile  for a 
baby to wear.  The new gown was reported to have been made from  Honiton lace 
bits and pieces in the royal collection.
 
6.  There are pictures of the Queen's wedding laces in quite  a few books 
written by our lace friends (past and present) in the  U.K.  
 
Suggestion for those with books on Honiton lace:  Please copy this  memo 
and place it in one of those for your future reference.
 
Jeri Ames in  Maine USA
Lace and Embroidery Resource Center  
--------------------------------------------------------
 
In a message dated 3/27/2012 11:30:11 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
clayblackw...@comcast.net writes:

Jeri, if  I am not mistaken, one of the reasons that Queen Victoria's 
wedding gown  is not given more respect is that much of the lace was 
removed from it and  used in other garments, particularly the Christening 
Gown worn by all of  her children, and many other Royal babies.  I 
believe that the last  to wear it was Prince William.  After that, it was 
considered too  fragile to be used again and is being carefully stored.

I'm no expert,  so I may have this completely wrong.  I'll welcome any  
corrections!

Clay

-
To unsubscribe send email to majord...@arachne.com containing the line:
unsubscribe lace y...@address.here. For help, write to
arachne.modera...@gmail.com. Photo site:
http://community.webshots.com/user/arachne2003/albums/most-recent

Reply via email to