On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes. Randulo, although I respect your ideas, I think that we're going to > keep the hashes for now.
No problem, I'm glad you at least address ideas when they come up. By the way, I have decided that it's a client need to implement things like IGNORE and MUTE so the same can be said of the hash tag issue. Personally I often forget to mark tags so I'm considering indexing all significant words in the background. Some day :) /r _______________________________________________ Laconica-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.laconi.ca/mailman/listinfo/laconica-dev
