Olá Evan e a todos. On Wednesday 28 January 2009 17:34:39 Evan Prodromou wrote: > * Conversations. Each notice that is a reply, or that has been > replied to, would include a link to a conversation page, which > shows the tree of notices that are in reply to each other (up to a > "root" that is not in reply to anything). You may be able to post > replies in that page.
One question: Will ever message containing @NICK considered a reply? If I dent @evan with a URL for some news, it shouldnt be related to a previous dent. We will need to distinguish between what is an ongoing conversation and what is a new thread, if both contain @NICK. On some µblogs that is visually easy, but with our current system, I dont see how we can do that. Via Web (and API clients like Gwibber) using the arrows is easy to build the thread (and even sub-threads even?), but other systems (XMPP, SMS,email) cant/shouldnt just build threads based on dents containing @NICK (or we will end up on the same bug that exists on Jaiku). Unless, we could setup a way to reply to threads instead of reply to user, but it will add extra complexly to the system. Opened to ideas. See more at http://laconi.ca/trac/wiki/BUGabundo/SetOfFeaturesToMakeAPerfectSocialNetwork > I'd really appreciate comments or suggestions here; this is my current > thinking and I could probably be convinced to change it around. You forgot one: Char limit. I know many think that µblogs should FORCE a limit. Me and several others believe there should be none, or at least much more relaxed. Personally I would love to see we follow Jaiku model: char limit for the OP (or is it OD Original Dent) and then a rather large limit or "no limit" for replies... Again, configurable so any one could set any of this limits on there own install. I know this would again cause trouble in the Federation but as I mention in [1], we could list that limit in the API/header/laconicaDB, and generate shortlinks if the dent doesn't fit on the destination system. [1] http://laconi.ca/trac/ticket/208 Finally, *Privacy*! > * Privacy. We're going to have to deal with privacy at some point, > so it might as well be now. Private notices, private streams, and > private groups. I really like a FoF (Friend of friend or Web of Friends) model. ALL privacy options should be created with that in mind. My idea is that any user should be able to limit or open access to other users based on scalable schema, some kind of sliding bar, that would range from NO ONE to PUBLIC. More at: http://laconi.ca/trac/wiki/BUGabundo/SocialNetworksDrillDown -- Hi, I'm BUGabundo, and I am Ubuntu (whyubuntu.com) (``-_-´´) http://LinuxNoDEI.BUGabundo.net Linux user #443786 GPG key 1024D/A1784EBB My new micro-blog @ http://BUGabundo.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Laconica-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.laconi.ca/mailman/listinfo/laconica-dev
