YZ wrote: > I am very glad to hear this if you planned to dev an admin panel for > version 0.9! > > But I preferred to manage all member or notice..etc in the front end of > system,not an independent admin panel system.
For security reasons though it makes sense to have the code separated. If a security risk is found in the frontend system, you don't want this to automagically include the admin rights. Simply too dangerous. So I would definitely vote for a completely separated admin code. This is based on experience as former developer of ecommerce solutions. The added burden of two logins and browser windows is an acceptable tradeoff when it comes ot security. IMHO. Jan -- Jan H Wildeboer | EMEA Open Source Affairs | Office: +49 (0)89 205071-207 Red Hat GmbH | Mobile: +49 (0)174 33 23 249 Technopark II, Haus C | Fax: +49 (0)89 205071-111 Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 11 -15 | 85630 Grasbrunn | _____________________________________________________________________ Reg. Adresse: Red Hat GmbH, Technopark II, Haus C, Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 11 -15 85630 Grasbrunn, Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 153243 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Brendan Lane, Charlie Peters, Michael Cunningham, Charles Cachera _____________________________________________________________________ GPG Key: 3AC3C8AB Fingerprint: 3D1E C4E0 DD67 E16D E47A 9564 A72F 5C39 3AC3 C8AB _______________________________________________ Laconica-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.laconi.ca/mailman/listinfo/laconica-dev
