Roland Gruber <[email protected]> le mardi 9 septembre 2014 à 21:18
+0200 a écrit:
>
Hi Rolland,
>
>do you manually upload the LDIF file?
Yes
> If yes, does the same problem
 
>happen when LAM creates the users itself. 
Yes
>The LDIF is more to check
 
>attribute generation and not to upload it manually.
I understand and never does normally; I just wanted to check the syntax of
the ldif file was correct.
>

>Are there any special characters in the affected passwords?
No, we removed the special characters in passwords to ensure that our
problem was not of this.
>
>
>Please check in tree view if the password hash matches the original
 
>password. There is a "check password" link next to user password.
I have already done this test in Apache Directory Studio, there is also a
feature to verify the password (userPassword attribute). I just do it at
the moment in tree view. Result : " Passwords match." for affected
passwords.
>
>When you click on "Show internal attributes" on such a user, is the
 
>modifyTimestamp the time of upload?
Yes.
The modifyTimestamp attribute displays the same setting for all accounts
including those imported with affected passwords.
>
>
>We need to reproduce the issue to be able to fix it.
I understand. I await your instructions for further testing.

Thank you
Pascal
>
>
>
>
>On 09.09.2014 16:49, PASCAL CASSAGNES wrote:
>> Hi Rolland,
>> I saw my CSV file multiple times including the password: I think it is
>> correct.
>> I do not use Excel to generate the CSV but LibreOffice.
>> I have no error in Lam message during upload. The addition of the LDIF
>> file (generated by Lam) directly the DB openLDAP (ldapmodify) is quite
>> normal.
>> This problem is random, ie that for the same CSV file downloaded,
>accounts
>> for which the password problem is not systematically the same.
>> Therefore there he has no problem with the hash of the password, or when
>> generating LDIF file Lam, either when writing the userPassword attribute
>> in OpenLDAP bd ?
>> (I dot not use ppolicy or outlook.)
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> Best regards
>> Pascal
>> 
>> Roland Gruber <[email protected]> le lundi 8 septembre 2014 à 18:44
>> +0200 a écrit:
>>> Hi Pascal, 
>>>
>>>
>>> please verify that the CSV file contains the correct password. Maybe
>your
>>> spreadsheet application does some reformatting. Especially, MS Excel is
>>> known to have all sorts of formatting. 
>>> Please also check that there are no extra spaces at the beginning or
>end
>>> of the password in your file. 
>>>
>>>
>>> If you use PPolicy please check that the account was not locked by it.
>>> Often, there are problems with copy+paste from email. E.g. Outlook
>often
>>> adds an extra space. 
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>>
>>> Roland
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my mobile 
>>>
>>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
>>> Von: PASCAL CASSAGNES <[email protected]> 
>>> Datum:08.09.2014 15:39 (GMT+01:00) 
>>> An: [email protected] 
>>> Cc: [email protected] 
>>> Betreff: [Lam-public] hash password 
>>>
>>> openSUSE 12.3
>>> Lam Pro 4.6
>>> OpenLDAP 2.4.33
>>> Setting hash Lam Pro and openLDAP = SSHA
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> We import the user accounts in the bd openLDAP with Lam Pro from a CSV
>>> file (created with LibreOffice).
>>> For some of these accounts, the hash of the password does not seem to
>do
>>> it properly though the syntax of the ldif file generated by Pro Lam
>from
>>> the CSV file looks just fine.
>>> Import command line (ldapmodify) of ldif file generated by Lam goes
>>> smoothly.
>>>
>>> For example, for two alam1 alam4 accounts created during the import:
>>>
>>> ldapwhoami -vvv -h 127.0.0.1-D uid = alam1, ou = users, dc =
>>> organization.fr, dc = local-x w nsh67yAB
>>> ldap_initialize (ldap: //127.0.0.1)
>>> dn: uid = alam1, ou = users, dc = organisation.fr, dc = local
>>> Result: Success (0)
>>>
>>> ldapwhoami -vvv -h 127.0.0.1-D uid = alam4, ou = users, dc =
>>> organization.fr, dc = local-x w NBHU_tGH
>>> ldap_initialize (ldap: //127.0.0.1)
>>> ldap_bind: Invalid credentials (49)
>>>
>>> For alam4 account, then it is sufficient to correct this problem,
>reenter
>>> via Lam password "Unix" for get everything in order.
>>>
>>> This issue is completely random : when reimport the same CSV file
>(prior
>>> removal of these accounts in Lam) it may be that this is the password
>>> (userPassword) of alam1 problem account or another account or more. 
>>>
>>> In these circumstances, using the import function is not satisfactory.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your help.
>>> Best regards.
>>> Pascal
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Want excitement?
>> Manually upgrade your production database.
>> When you want reliability, choose Perforce.
>> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
>>
>http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lam-public mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lam-public
>> 
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Want excitement?
>Manually upgrade your production database.
>When you want reliability, choose Perforce.
>Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
>http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>_______________________________________________
>Lam-public mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lam-public



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Lam-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lam-public

Reply via email to