On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 18:22 -0500, Colin Walters wrote: >>I'd envision things like mapping types (python's dict vs. glib's hash >>table), where being able to express things in structured way would >>de-uglify the process a lot. > >Not sure what you're saying here. Would this be e.g. a desire to note >that a particular GHashTable maps string->string? Perhaps what we could >do here is register GTypes for this, or make the introspection type >system more recursive. Note in Java and C# this stuff is part of the >core language, not annotations.
Note that the type blobs in the metadata already allow you to specify hash tables with arbitrary key and value types. Matthias _______________________________________________ language-bindings mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/language-bindings
