On 7/15/05, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/15/05, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 13:01 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > > Le vendredi 15 juillet 2005 à 12:20 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit : > > > > GTK+ is now mostly API frozen and GNOME is in official API/ABI freeze. > > > > But GTK+ might add one or two bits of API. I think language-bindings > > > > should be allowed to wrap those new things quickly if it's simple (r-t > > > > members should speak up if they object).
I agree. > > > Did we come to a consensus regarding GTK+ 2.8? > > > > I think yes, while asking people to be cautious. > > Agreed, though if Elijah is running HEAD, I'd love to hear his impression. Due to disappearing off the face of the planet for a while (http://www.gnome.org/~newren/blog/2005/Jul/03), I've only been running HEAD for about 2-3 weeks and haven't really stress tested it, though I have run using it for all my daily work during that time and it's been solid for me. I am aware of two issues as related to WM interaction, but neither provide a regression relative to the Gnome 2.10/gtk+ 2.6 combo and both require Metacity fixes first anyway. So, I also agree with Murray. Elijah _______________________________________________ language-bindings mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/language-bindings
