At 05:39 PM 9/19/2001 -0700, Paul Prescod wrote:
>If one presumes that Parrot is going to be so much nicer than the
>current Perl internals that many more people will be interested in it,
>then maybe it makes sense to make names as readable as possible, even if
>they are not what Perl historically used.
>
>I propose, for example, "intval" for IV and "floatval" for NV.
The only problem with those is they're so long, and I'm lazy. :)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Paul Prescod
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Jason Watkins
- RE: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Brent Dax
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Sterling Hughes
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Paul Prescod
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Donal K. Fellows
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Stephane Payrard
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? David Cantrell
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? boris
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
