Dan Sugalski wrote: > >... > Yup. There's a vtable function who's sole purpose is to return the name of > the variable's type, as well as an integer representing its type. There's > also an isa and can function in there. Why not merely have a vtable function that returns the type object which knows its own name, has a pointer value (rather than an integer) and does isa and can. Paul Prescod
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Mathieu Bouchard
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Kurt D. Starsinic
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Paul Prescod
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Paul Prescod
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Fred L. Drake, Jr.
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Hong Zhang
- RE: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Paul Prescod
- RE: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Samuele Pedroni
- RE: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Samuele Pedroni
- RE: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Hong Zhang
- RE: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Paul Prescod
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- RE: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Brent Dax
