Bugs item #3524295, was opened at 2012-05-07 01:08 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by janschreiber You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=655717&aid=3524295&group_id=110216
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Problem with German Group: development version Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Jan Schreiber (janschreiber) Assigned to: Daniel Naber (dnaber) Summary: [de] false positives of DE_AGREEMENT rule Initial Comment: I attach some false positives in a text file. Most conspicuously, the first two or three examples seem to show that 'wir' is treated as an article rather than a pronoun by this rule. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jan Schreiber (janschreiber) Date: 2012-05-07 11:55 Message: Thanks for the fast responses. I'll download a nightly build later this week and test it on Wikipedia data. Hitting the right balance between true and false positives will always be a problem. Maybe we can cover some of the newly introduced false negatives of the Java rule by an XML rule? BTW I'm planning to do a small comparison Hunspell+LanguageTool vs. MS Word (built-in spell-check and grammar capabilities) vs. Duden Korrektor in the near future. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Daniel Naber (dnaber) Date: 2012-05-07 11:22 Message: I fixed the issue with "wir", but we now miss the error in "Erst recht wir fleißiges Arbeiter." The rule could use a general rewrite anyway. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: gulp21 (gulp21-1) Date: 2012-05-07 10:04 Message: I fixed some false positives, but there is stil a problem with "wir", "denselben", and "diejenigen". These words are tagged as "ALG", which might be a problem; ll. 416-423 seem to contain code to handle that postag. PRONOUNS_TO_BE_IGNORED contains "wir", but it is commented out for some reason. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=655717&aid=3524295&group_id=110216 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Languagetool-cvs mailing list Languagetool-cvs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-cvs
