Bugs item #3541348, was opened at 2012-07-08 04:00
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by milek_pl
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=655717&aid=3541348&group_id=110216

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 6
Private: No
Submitted By: Dominique Pelle (dominikoeo)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: "ant test" reports spurious errors in rule Breton rules

Initial Comment:
"ant test" reports the following errors which look spurious:

    [junit] The Breton rule: KLANV_PE_GLANVOCH:1 contains "\0" that is marked 
as regular expression but probably is not one.
    [junit] The Breton rule: KLANV_PE_GLANVOCH:2 contains "\0" that is marked 
as regular expression but probably is not one.
    [junit] The Breton rule: KLANV_PE_GLANVOCH:3 contains "\0" that is marked 
as regular expression but probably is not one.
    [junit] The Breton rule: KLANV_PE_GLANVOCH:4 contains "\0" that is marked 
as regular expression but probably is not one.
    [junit] The Breton rule: KLANV_PE_GLANVOCH:5 contains "\0" that is marked 
as regular expression but probably is not one.
    [junit] The Breton rule: KLANV_PE_GLANVOCH:6 contains "\0" that is marked 
as regular expression but probably is not one.
    [junit] The Breton rule: KLANV_PE_GLANVOCH:7 contains "\0" that is marked 
as regular expression but probably is not one.

The rule contains <match no="0" ...> which does not look correctly expanded 
when doing the unit tests.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Marcin Miłkowski (milek_pl)
Date: 2012-07-12 02:41

Message:
I stopped the test from checking reference elements.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Marcin Miłkowski (milek_pl)
Date: 2012-07-11 01:34

Message:
This is how match no=1 is treated by the PatternRuleLoader. It's not a bug.
There's a bug in the test, I believe.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=655717&aid=3541348&group_id=110216

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Languagetool-cvs mailing list
Languagetool-cvs@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-cvs

Reply via email to