Right. It crashed again with the big batch. Some solution would be nice.
Ruud On 02-10-13 12:00, Stefan Lotties wrote: > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Daniel Naber <list2...@danielnaber.de> wrote: >> On 2013-10-02 11:14, Stefan Lotties wrote: >> >>> Sounds right. The fix should look very similar to the one in >>> BaseTagger: cache the Dictionary, but re-create the IStemme whenever >>> it's needed. >> Depending on how complicated this becomes, just protecting the calls >> with 'synchronized' would also be fine with me. >> >> It would be nice if you could take care of this. > I'll check some more code then. It's already the second part that > still isn't thread-safe and there might be more. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > October Webinars: Code for Performance > Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. > Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from > the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Languagetool-devel mailing list > Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Languagetool-devel mailing list Languagetool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
